Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington/ Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012 Jun;31(6):551-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31824da5bd.
The object of this study was to determine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revision(s) are associated with increased risk of CSF shunt infection, after adjusting for baseline factors that contribute to infection risk.
This was a retrospective cohort study of 579 children aged 0-18 years who underwent initial CSF shunt placement between January 01, 1997 and October 12, 2006 at a tertiary care children's hospital. The outcome of interest was CSF shunt infection. Data for all subsequent CSF shunt revisions leading up to and including the initial CSF shunt infection, when applicable, were obtained. The likelihood of infection was determined using a Cox proportional hazard model accounting for patient characteristics and CSF shunt revisions, and is reported using hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
There were 123 children who developed infection. Baseline factors independently associated with hazard of infection included age 0 to <6 months at CSF shunt placement (HR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.02-6.7) and myelomeningocele (HR 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.8). Controlling for baseline factors, the risk of infection after shunt revision was significantly greater than at the time of initial placement (HR 3.0, 95% CI: 1.9-4.7), and this risk increased as numbers of revisions increased (≥2 revisions HR 6.5, 95% CI: 3.6-11.4).
Although younger age is associated with increased hazard of infection, subsequent CSF shunt revision significantly increases infection risk.
本研究旨在确定在调整基线因素(这些因素会增加感染风险)后,脑脊液(CSF)分流器修复是否与增加 CSF 分流器感染风险相关。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1997 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 10 月 12 日期间在一家三级儿童保健医院接受初次 CSF 分流器放置的 579 名 0-18 岁的儿童。研究的主要转归是 CSF 分流器感染。获取了所有后续 CSF 分流器修复的数据,直至并包括适用的初次 CSF 分流器感染。使用 Cox 比例风险模型确定感染的可能性,该模型考虑了患者特征和 CSF 分流器修复,并使用风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)报告。
共有 123 名儿童发生感染。与感染风险独立相关的基线因素包括 CSF 分流器放置时年龄为 0-<6 个月(HR 2.4,95%CI:1.02-6.7)和脊髓脊膜膨出(HR 0.4,95%CI:0.2-0.8)。控制基线因素后,分流器修复后的感染风险明显高于初次放置时(HR 3.0,95%CI:1.9-4.7),且随着修复次数的增加(≥2 次修复 HR 6.5,95%CI:3.6-11.4),感染风险也会增加。
尽管年龄较小与感染风险增加相关,但随后的 CSF 分流器修复会显著增加感染风险。