Forensische Gerontologie, Department für Gerichtsmedizin Wien, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Jan;109(3):27-32. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0027. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
Physical restraint is used primarily for patients at risk of falling, those with motor unrest and agitated behavior, and those who manifest an intention of doing harm to themselves or are at risk of suicide. The use of freedom-restraining measures (FRM), and, in particular, the use of physical restraints against the patient's will, can be a serious intrusion of basic human rights and, as such, an act of violence against the patient. The improper use of physical restraints can cause injuries of varying severity, which can sometimes be fatal.
We analyzed all cases of death under physical restraint that were recorded in the autopsy reports of the Institute of Forensic Medicine in Munich from 1997 to 2010.
Among the 27 353 autopsies conducted over the period of the study, there were 26 cases of death while the individual was physically restrained. Three of these cases involved patients who died of natural causes while restrained, and one was a suicide. The remaining 22 deaths were caused solely by physical restraint; all of them occurred in patients under nursing care who were not continuously observed. The immediate cause of death was strangulation (11 cases), chest compression (8 cases), or dangling in the head-down position (3 cases). In 19 of these 22 patients, the restraints were incorrectly fastened, including two cases in which improvised non-standard restraints were used. One nursing-home patient died because of an abdominal restraint even though it had been correctly applied: She was mobile enough to slip through the restraint till it compressed her neck, and then unable to extricate herself from it, so that she died of strangulation.
To prevent such deaths, we recommend from a forensic medical standpoint that all possible alternatives to FRM should be used instead. If direct-contact restraints are truly necessary, they must be applied as recommended and the restrained person must be closely observed.
身体约束主要用于有跌倒风险、运动不受控制和行为激动、有自我伤害意图或有自杀风险的患者。使用限制自由的措施(FRM),特别是违背患者意愿使用身体约束,可能严重侵犯基本人权,因此是对患者的一种暴力行为。身体约束的不当使用会导致不同严重程度的伤害,有时甚至是致命的。
我们分析了慕尼黑法医研究所 1997 年至 2010 年尸检报告中记录的所有身体约束下死亡的案例。
在研究期间进行的 27353 次尸检中,有 26 例死亡是在身体约束下发生的。其中 3 例涉及被约束时自然死亡的患者,1 例为自杀。其余 22 例死亡完全由身体约束引起;所有这些死亡都发生在未持续观察的护理患者中。直接死因是绞颈(11 例)、胸部压迫(8 例)或头朝下悬挂(3 例)。在这 22 名患者中的 19 名,约束带系得不正确,包括两例使用了非标准的临时约束带。一名养老院患者因腹部约束而死亡,尽管约束带系得正确:她有足够的活动能力从约束带中滑脱,直到约束带压迫她的颈部,然后无法从约束带中解脱出来,导致她窒息而死。
从法医医学的角度来看,为了防止此类死亡,我们建议使用所有可能的 FRM 替代方法。如果确实需要直接接触约束,必须按照建议进行应用,并密切观察受约束的人。