Erkanli S, Bolat F, Seydaoglu G
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32(6):619-25.
Lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in terms of its relation to long-term survival of endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients. We aimed to investigate the rate of micrometastases in lymph nodes of EC patients that were previously reported as negative with routine histopathology, and the relationship with clinical and pathologic factors.
With immunohistochemistry, we retrospectively looked at cytokeratin staining of lymph nodes from 47 EC patients, that were previously reported to be negative for lymph node metastases after full surgical staging and routine histopathologic investigation. We also looked at the relationship between micrometastases and clinical, histopathologic factors and recurrence.
Of all 47 patients, seven (14.9%) were found to have micrometastases in their previously negatively reported lymph nodes. Six out of seven of these patients (85.7%) were high-risk EC patients. Among high-risk EC patients, 50% had micrometastases, whereas only one patient out of 35 with low or intermediate risk had micrometastases (2.9%). The difference between these groups was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Grade was also correlated with micrometastases (p = 0.0001). Mean follow-up time was 55.5 +/- 13.3 months. There were two recurrences in the group having cytokeratin micrometastasis, whereas no patients without micrometastases developed any recurrence. While 36 months recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 100% in patients without micrometastases, it was 71% in patients with micrometastases (mean rate 57 months) (p = 0.0004). Both RFS and overall survival were statistically significantly inferior for patients having micrometastases, high-risk status, and lymphovascular space involvement (p < 0.05).
It seems reasonable to further analyze negative lymph nodes in high-risk EC patients for micrometastases utilizing immunohistochemistry techniques. Half of this group of patients are still at risk of lymph node metastases even if routine histological findings are negative for metastases. The finding of micrometastases can change therapeutic decisions for the better by incorporating adjuvant treatment options.
就子宫内膜癌(EC)患者的长期生存而言,淋巴结状态是最重要的预后因素。我们旨在调查既往常规组织病理学报告为阴性的EC患者淋巴结中的微转移率,以及与临床和病理因素的关系。
我们采用免疫组织化学方法,回顾性观察了47例EC患者淋巴结的细胞角蛋白染色情况,这些患者在完整手术分期和常规组织病理学检查后,既往报告淋巴结转移为阴性。我们还观察了微转移与临床、组织病理学因素及复发之间的关系。
在所有47例患者中,7例(14.9%)在其既往报告为阴性的淋巴结中发现有微转移。这7例患者中有6例(85.7%)为高危EC患者。在高危EC患者中,50%有微转移,而35例低危或中危患者中只有1例有微转移(2.9%)。这些组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。分级也与微转移相关(p = 0.0001)。平均随访时间为55.5±13.3个月。有细胞角蛋白微转移的组中有2例复发,而无微转移的患者未发生任何复发。无微转移患者的36个月无复发生存率(RFS)为100%,有微转移患者的为71%(平均率57个月)(p = 0.0004)。有微转移、高危状态和淋巴管间隙受累的患者,其RFS和总生存率在统计学上均显著较差(p < 0.05)。
利用免疫组织化学技术进一步分析高危EC患者的阴性淋巴结中的微转移似乎是合理的。即使常规组织学检查结果显示转移阴性,这组患者中有一半仍有淋巴结转移风险。微转移的发现可以通过纳入辅助治疗方案更好地改变治疗决策。