Suppr超能文献

前哨淋巴结引导下腋窝淋巴结清扫术引入后乳腺癌女性患者的分期

Staging of women with breast cancer after introduction of sentinel node guided axillary dissection.

作者信息

Tvedskov Tove Filtenborg

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2012 Jul;59(7):B4475.

Abstract

Today, sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as standard procedure for staging of the axilla in the treatment of breast cancer. SLND can accurately stage the axilla by removing on average only two lymph nodes. Only in case of metastatic spread to sentinel nodes an ALND is offered. Removing fewer nodes has made more extensive histopathological examinations of the lymph nodes possible and as a consequence more metastases are found. This has resulted in stage migration. Based on data from the nationwide Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) database we have estimated the magnitude and therapeutic consequences of this stage migration in Denmark by comparing the distribution of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients operated in 1993-1996 and 2005-2008; before and after introducing SLND. The proportion of patients having macrometastases was not significantly different in the two periods, whereas the proportion of patients with micrometastases increased significantly from 5.1% to 9.0%. However, the proportion of patients offered adjuvant systemic treatment due to positive nodal status as the only high-risk criterion did only increase from 7.8% to 8.8%, when estimated using today´s criteria for risk-allocation, because nodal status is now less important in risk-allocation. In general, only 15-20% of patients with micrometastases and 10-15% of patients with isolated tumor cells (ITC) in sentinel node have further metastatic spread to non-sentinel nodes (NSN). Thus, the majority of these patients does not benefit from additional ALND but still run the risk of arm morbidity. Based on data from the DBCG database, we have developed two models to predict NSN metastases in breast cancer patients with micrometastases or ITC in the sentinel node. A total number of 304 breast cancer patients with ITC and 1577 patients with micrometastases in sentinel node operated in 2001-2008 with SLND and subsequent ALND were identified in the database. In patients with ITC in sentinel node the risk of NSN metastases was significantly associated with younger age at diagnosis, increasing tumor size and increasing proportion of positive sentinel nodes in a multivariate analysis. If patients were ≥ 40 years at diagnosis with tumor size ≤ 2 cm as well as one or more negative sentinel nodes, NSN metastases were found in only 2%. Omission of ALND in this group would spare 1/3 of patients with ITC in sentinel node for an ALND. In patients with micrometastases in sentinel node the risk of NSN metastases was significantly associated with increasing tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, negative hormone receptor status, location of tumor in the upper lateral quadrant of the breast and increasing proportion of positive sentinel nodes in a multivariate analysis. However, a model based on these traditional prognostic markers could not identify a subgroup of patients with a risk of NSN metastases less than 10%. We then investigated whether the biochemical prognostic markers TIMP-1, Ki67 and HER2 could support the model. In a matched case-control study 25 cases with micrometastases in sentinel node and additional metastatic spread to NSN were compared to 50 matched controls with micrometastases in sentinel node but without NSN metastases. Despite being prognostic markers in breast cancer, we found no significant differences in the expression of these three biochemical markers between patients with and without NSN metastases. Not all NSN metastases will become clinically relevant, making ALND redundant in many breast cancer patients. Accordingly, there is a trend towards omission of ALND in breast cancer patients with minimal metastatic disease in sentinel node. As a result, a tool is needed to identify a group of patients with high risk of recurrence, where ALND should still be offered. In our model a small group of patients with micrometastases had a high risk of NSN metastases on nearly 40%, comparable to patients with macrometastases, indicating that ALND may still be recommended in this subgroup in the future.

摘要

如今,前哨淋巴结清扫术(SLND)已取代腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND),成为乳腺癌治疗中腋窝分期的标准程序。SLND平均仅切除两个淋巴结就能准确对腋窝进行分期。仅在前哨淋巴结发生转移扩散的情况下才进行ALND。切除较少的淋巴结使得对淋巴结进行更广泛的组织病理学检查成为可能,结果发现了更多转移灶。这导致了分期迁移。基于丹麦全国乳腺癌合作组(DBCG)数据库的数据,我们通过比较1993 - 1996年和2005 - 2008年接受手术的乳腺癌患者(即引入SLND前后)腋窝淋巴结转移的分布情况,估算了丹麦这种分期迁移的程度及其治疗后果。两个时期中发生大转移灶的患者比例无显著差异,而微转移灶患者的比例从5.1%显著增至9.0%。然而,当按照如今的风险分配标准估算时,仅因淋巴结阳性状态作为唯一高危标准而接受辅助性全身治疗的患者比例仅从7.8%增至8.8%,因为如今淋巴结状态在风险分配中已不那么重要。一般来说,前哨淋巴结中有微转移灶的患者中只有15 - 20%,以及有孤立肿瘤细胞(ITC)的患者中有10 - 15%会进一步发生转移扩散至非前哨淋巴结(NSN)。因此,这些患者中的大多数无法从额外的ALND中获益,但仍有手臂发生病变的风险。基于DBCG数据库的数据,我们开发了两个模型来预测前哨淋巴结中有微转移灶或ITC的乳腺癌患者发生NSN转移的情况。在数据库中确定了2001 - 2008年接受SLND及后续ALND手术的304例前哨淋巴结中有ITC的乳腺癌患者和1577例前哨淋巴结中有微转移灶的患者。在前哨淋巴结中有ITC的患者中,多因素分析显示NSN转移风险与诊断时年龄较轻、肿瘤大小增加以及前哨淋巴结阳性比例增加显著相关。如果患者诊断时年龄≥40岁,肿瘤大小≤2 cm且有一个或多个阴性前哨淋巴结,那么NSN转移的发生率仅为2%。在这组患者中省略ALND可使三分之一前哨淋巴结中有ITC的患者免于接受ALND。在前哨淋巴结中有微转移灶的患者中,多因素分析显示NSN转移风险与肿瘤大小增加、淋巴管浸润、激素受体阴性状态、肿瘤位于乳腺外上象限以及前哨淋巴结阳性比例增加显著相关。然而,基于这些传统预后标志物的模型无法识别出NSN转移风险低于10%的患者亚组。然后我们研究了生化预后标志物基质金属蛋白酶组织抑制因子-1(TIMP - 1)、Ki67和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)是否能为该模型提供支持。在一项匹配病例对照研究中,将25例前哨淋巴结中有微转移灶且有额外转移扩散至NSN的病例与50例匹配的对照进行比较,这些对照前哨淋巴结中有微转移灶但无NSN转移。尽管这三种生化标志物是乳腺癌的预后标志物,但我们发现有和没有NSN转移的患者之间这三种生化标志物的表达无显著差异。并非所有NSN转移都会在临床上具有相关性,这使得许多乳腺癌患者进行ALND变得多余。因此,对于前哨淋巴结中转移灶最少的乳腺癌患者,有省略ALND的趋势。结果,需要一种工具来识别一组复发风险高的患者,对于这组患者仍应进行ALND。在我们的模型中,一小部分有微转移灶的患者发生NSN转移的风险接近40%,与有大转移灶的患者相当,这表明未来在这个亚组中可能仍建议进行ALND。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验