Sun Ying, Chen Ming-chun, Sun Ye-huan, Wang Tie-zhu, Cao Qing-qing, Gu Chao-mei, Han Teng-wei, Zhang Dong-dong, Sun Li-na
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Nov;32(11):1117-21.
To describe the current epidemiological characteristics of injuries among primary and middle school students in one rural area of Anhui province and to explore the relationship between the ways of coping and related injuries.
Through cluster sampling methods, all students from 3 to 9 grades in 5 primary schools and 3 middle schools in Changfeng county of Anhui province were investigated with questionnaire. All participants completed an anonymous questionnaire concerning their experiences with injuries during the 12 months preceding the survey. The ways of coping to injuries were evaluated by Trait Coping Style Questionnaire. Factors associated with injuries were identified using a negative binomial regression analysis.
Of 2917 students, the annual event-based rate of injuries was 17.4 per 100 students. Positive coping score had no significant differences between the injury and non-injury groups (33.98 ± 6.38 vs. 33.66 ± 6.37) (t = 0.979, P = 0.328). The score of negative coping style was higher in injury group than in non-injury group (27.65 ± 7.79 vs. 26.54 ± 7.62) (t = 2.775, P = 0.006). Statistically, the annual injury rates were significantly different in three groups on their negative styles of coping (χ(2) = 6.131, P = 0.013). Data from the multivariable negative binomial regression analysis, after adjusted for demographic characteristics, showed no significant difference on the relationship between positive coping style and injury incidence. Those with moderate negative style of coping had lower risks compared to those with highly negative one (IRR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.63 - 0.94).
Negative ways of coping was an important risk factor for injuries. Data from our research suggested that psychological preventive measure need to be taken to improve the style of coping. It was also important to promote the related personality development in planning the strategies for future prevention on injuries.
描述安徽省某农村地区中小学生伤害的流行病学特征,探讨应对方式与伤害之间的关系。
采用整群抽样方法,对安徽省长丰县5所小学和3所中学3至9年级的所有学生进行问卷调查。所有参与者完成一份关于调查前12个月内受伤经历的匿名问卷。采用特质应对方式问卷评估应对伤害的方式。使用负二项回归分析确定与伤害相关的因素。
在2917名学生中,以事件为基础的年伤害发生率为每100名学生17.4例。伤害组与非伤害组的积极应对得分无显著差异(33.98±6.38 vs. 33.66±6.37)(t = 0.979,P = 0.328)。伤害组的消极应对方式得分高于非伤害组(27.65±7.79 vs. 26.54±7.62)(t = 2.775,P = 0.006)。在统计学上,三组消极应对方式的年伤害发生率有显著差异(χ(2)=6.131,P = 0.013)。多变量负二项回归分析数据经人口统计学特征调整后,积极应对方式与伤害发生率之间的关系无显著差异。与高度消极应对方式者相比,中度消极应对方式者的风险较低(IRR = 0.77,95%CI:0.63 - 0.94)。
消极应对方式是伤害的重要危险因素。我们的研究数据表明,需要采取心理预防措施来改善应对方式。在规划未来伤害预防策略时,促进相关人格发展也很重要。