Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet, Sveavägen 160, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Apr;74(7):1091-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.027. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
The number of studies analysing income inequality and health are voluminous. However, when empirically testing the income inequality hypothesis, the level of aggregation could be crucial for whether we find an association or not and for the mechanisms we believe are active. This study hence investigates: (1) the two-year lagged effect by income inequality on health at two levels of aggregation; municipalities and neighbourhoods in Sweden; (2) whether spending on social goods accounts for the association between income inequality and health; (3) the effect by income inequality among the affluent and the disadvantaged in municipalities and neighbourhoods, respectively. The empirical data is based on a Swedish public health survey in 2002 and includes residents of Stockholm aged 18-84 years. The sample consists of 28,092 individuals nested within 22 municipalities and 709 neighbourhoods in the county of Stockholm with a non-response rate of 37 percent. A total population register (HSIA) is further used for the construction of contextual-level indicators. Primary method used is multi-level logistic regression. The findings indicate a moderate effect by high and very high income inequality on self-rated poor health at the municipality-level. The association, however, ceases after adjustment for spending on social goods. No detrimental effect by income inequality on self-rated health at the neighbourhood-level is found. The results further suggest that poor individuals residing in high inequality neighbourhoods do not have poorer health than those residing in low inequality contexts while high inequality is most deleterious for poor individuals at the municipality-level. In sum, the findings suggest that reduced spending on social goods could account for the association between income inequality and health at the municipality-level. The contrasting findings at the neighbourhood- and municipality-level indicate that it is important to consider the level of aggregation when studying health effects by income inequality.
分析收入不平等与健康关系的研究数量众多。然而,在实证检验收入不平等假说时,聚合水平对于我们是否发现关联以及我们认为哪些机制起作用至关重要。本研究旨在调查:(1)在瑞典的市镇和邻里两个层面上,收入不平等对健康的两年滞后效应;(2)社会福利支出是否解释了收入不平等与健康之间的关联;(3)在市镇和邻里层面上,富裕阶层和弱势群体的收入不平等分别产生的影响。本研究的实证数据基于瑞典 2002 年的一项公共卫生调查,包括斯德哥尔摩县年龄在 18-84 岁的居民。样本包括 28092 人,他们嵌套在斯德哥尔摩的 22 个市镇和 709 个邻里中,应答率为 37%。进一步使用综合人口登记(HSIA)来构建情境层面的指标。主要方法是多层次逻辑回归。研究结果表明,在市镇层面上,高收入和极高收入不平等对自我评估的健康状况有中度影响。然而,在调整社会福利支出后,这种关联就会消失。在邻里层面上,收入不平等对自我评估的健康状况没有不利影响。研究结果还表明,居住在高不平等邻里的贫困人群的健康状况并不比居住在低不平等环境中的人差,而在市镇层面上,高不平等对贫困人群的影响最为不利。总之,研究结果表明,减少社会福利支出可能会解释市镇层面上收入不平等与健康之间的关联。邻里和市镇层面的对比结果表明,在研究收入不平等对健康的影响时,考虑聚合水平非常重要。