Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012 Apr;8(4):506-8. doi: 10.4161/hv.18334. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Sipuleucel-T, a new autologous active cellular immunotherapy, is indicated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This Commentary aims to highlight pharmaco-economic aspects relating to the clinical evidence, cost-effectiveness and reimbursement of sipuleucel-T. Today, there is still uncertainty surrounding the clinical benefit of sipuleucel-T and existing evidence relates to the efficacy of sipuleucel-T in a structured setting rather than to its effectiveness in a real-world setting. Due to the clinical uncertainty, there may be scope to introduce a 'coverage with evidence development' scheme, where sipuleucel-T is reimbursed subject to further evidence being generated about its (cost-)effectiveness. Given the high price for a modest effectiveness, sipuleucel-T is unlikely to be cost-effective. However, other societal considerations may matter such as the fact that sipuleucel-T is an end-of-life treatment. A case can be made to apply weights to quality-adjusted life years accrued in the later stages of terminal diseases, thereby improving the cost-effectiveness of sipuleucel-T. Also, risk-sharing arrangements could be considered where the manufacturer shares the risk with the third-party payer that the product may or may not be effective for a particular patient. However, the current absence of markers to identify eligible patients and to assess treatment response inhibits the implementation of a risk-sharing arrangement for sipuleucel-T.
Sipuleucel-T 是一种新的自体活性细胞免疫疗法,适用于转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌。本述评旨在强调与 sipuleucel-T 的临床证据、成本效益和报销相关的药物经济学方面。目前,sipuleucel-T 的临床获益仍存在不确定性,现有证据与 sipuleucel-T 在结构化环境中的疗效有关,而不是其在真实环境中的有效性。由于临床存在不确定性,因此可能有必要引入“有证据开发的覆盖范围”方案,根据其(成本)效益产生更多证据,从而报销 sipuleucel-T。鉴于其适度疗效的高昂价格,sipuleucel-T 不太可能具有成本效益。然而,其他社会因素可能更为重要,例如 sipuleucel-T 是一种生命末期的治疗方法。可以考虑对终末期疾病后期获得的质量调整生命年来进行加权,从而提高 sipuleucel-T 的成本效益。此外,可以考虑风险分担安排,制造商与第三方支付者分担产品对特定患者可能有效或无效的风险。然而,目前缺乏识别合格患者和评估治疗反应的标志物,这限制了 sipuleucel-T 风险分担安排的实施。