• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检察官报告的大麻案件处理情况与社区青少年与大麻相关的态度和行为之间联系的证据。

Evidence for Connections Between Prosecutor-Reported Marijuana Case Dispositions and Community Youth Marijuana-Related Attitudes and Behaviors.

作者信息

Terry-McElrath Yvonne M, McBride Duane C, Chriqui Jamie F, O'Malley Patrick M, Vanderwaal Curtis J, Chaloupka Frank J, Johnston Lloyd D

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Crime Delinq. 2009 Oct;55(4):600-626. doi: 10.1177/0011128707310001.

DOI:10.1177/0011128707310001
PMID:22337733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3278300/
Abstract

This article examines relationships between local drug policy (as represented by prosecutor-reported case outcomes for first-offender juvenile marijuana possession cases) and youth self-reported marijuana use, perceived risk, and disapproval. Interviews with prosecutors and surveys of 8th-, 10th-, and 12th-grade students in the United States were conducted in 2000. Analyses include data from 97 prosecutors and students from 127 schools in 40 states. Results indicate significant relationships between local drug policy and youth marijuana use and attitudes. In general, more-severe dispositions are associated with less marijuana use, higher disapproval rates, and increased perceptions of great risk. Associations primarily appear to be specific to marijuana-related outcomes. Results are discussed within the framework of both deterrence and broader social norms regarding substance use.

摘要

本文研究了地方毒品政策(以检察官报告的初犯青少年持有大麻案件的案件结果为代表)与青少年自我报告的大麻使用情况、感知风险和不赞成态度之间的关系。2000年,对美国检察官进行了访谈,并对八年级、十年级和十二年级的学生进行了调查。分析数据来自97名检察官以及40个州127所学校的学生。结果表明,地方毒品政策与青少年大麻使用情况及态度之间存在显著关系。总体而言,更严厉的处置方式与较少的大麻使用、更高的不赞成率以及对巨大风险的认知增加相关。这些关联主要似乎特定于与大麻相关的结果。本文在威慑以及关于药物使用的更广泛社会规范的框架内对研究结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Evidence for Connections Between Prosecutor-Reported Marijuana Case Dispositions and Community Youth Marijuana-Related Attitudes and Behaviors.检察官报告的大麻案件处理情况与社区青少年与大麻相关的态度和行为之间联系的证据。
Crime Delinq. 2009 Oct;55(4):600-626. doi: 10.1177/0011128707310001.
2
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
3
Effects of school-level norms on student substance use.学校层面规范对学生物质使用的影响。
Prev Sci. 2002 Jun;3(2):105-24. doi: 10.1023/a:1015431300471.
4
How does state marijuana policy affect US youth? Medical marijuana laws, marijuana use and perceived harmfulness: 1991-2014.美国各州的大麻政策如何影响美国青少年?医用大麻法律、大麻使用及感知到的危害性:1991 - 2014年
Addiction. 2016 Dec;111(12):2187-2195. doi: 10.1111/add.13523. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
The social norms of birth cohorts and adolescent marijuana use in the United States, 1976-2007.美国 1976-2007 年出生队列的社会规范与青少年大麻使用情况。
Addiction. 2011 Oct;106(10):1790-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03485.x. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
6
Trends in use of marijuana and attitudes toward marijuana among youth before and after decriminalization: the case of California 2007-2013.大麻合法化前后青少年使用大麻的趋势及对大麻的态度:以2007 - 2013年的加利福尼亚州为例
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Apr;26(4):336-44. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
Perceived harm as a mediator of the relationship between social norms and marijuana use and related consequences among American Indian youth.感知到的危害在社会规范与美国印第安青年的大麻使用及相关后果之间的关系中的中介作用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Dec 1;181:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
8
Employment and Marijuana Use Among Washington State Adolescents Before and After Legalization of Retail Marijuana.华盛顿州青少年在大麻零售店合法化前后的就业和大麻使用情况。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jul;65(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.027. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
Use of E-Cigarettes for Nicotine, Marijuana, and Just Flavoring Among U.S. Youth.美国青少年使用电子烟的情况:尼古丁、大麻和仅仅为了调味。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Feb;58(2):244-249. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
Race/Ethnicity Differences in Trends of Marijuana, Cigarette, and Alcohol Use Among 8th, 10th, and 12th Graders in Washington State, 2004-2016.种族/民族差异对华盛顿州 8 至 12 年级学生在大麻、香烟和酒精使用趋势的影响:2004-2016 年数据分析
Prev Sci. 2019 Feb;20(2):194-204. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0899-0.

本文引用的文献

1
What does it mean to decriminalize marijuana? A cross-national empirical examination.
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2005;16:347-69.
2
Trajectories of Marijuana Use During the Transition to Adulthood: The Big Picture Based on National Panel Data.成年转型期大麻使用轨迹:基于全国性面板数据的全景图
J Drug Issues. 2005;35(2):255-279. doi: 10.1177/002204260503500203.
3
The meth menace: battling the fast-paced spread of methamphetamine may mean attacking it from several fronts.冰毒威胁:对抗冰毒的快速传播可能意味着要从多个方面展开行动。
State Legis. 2005 May;31(5):14-8.
4
The epidemiology of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use among Mexican American, Puerto Rican, Cuban American, and other Latin American eighth-grade students in the United States: 1991-2002.1991 - 2002年美国墨西哥裔、波多黎各裔、古巴裔及其他拉丁裔八年级学生酒精、大麻和可卡因使用情况的流行病学研究
Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):696-702. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.037051.
5
Treating drug-abusing offenders. Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California's Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes.治疗药物滥用罪犯。一项关于加利福尼亚州第36号提案对治疗系统和患者结局影响的五县研究的初步结果。
Eval Rev. 2003 Oct;27(5):479-505. doi: 10.1177/0193841X03255774.
6
Behavioral health issue brief: California's Proposition 36 and other state diversion programs: moving drug offenders out of prison and into treatment: year end report-2002.行为健康问题简报:加利福尼亚州第36号提案及其他州的转移计划:将毒品罪犯从监狱转移到治疗机构:2002年年终报告
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2002 Dec 31:1-23.
7
State medical marijuana laws: understanding the laws and their limitations.州医用大麻法律:了解这些法律及其局限性。
J Public Health Policy. 2002;23(4):413-39.
8
Controlling and policing substance use(rs).管控和监管物质使用者。
Subst Use Misuse. 2002 Jun-Aug;37(8-10):973-83. doi: 10.1081/ja-120004161.
9
Are risk and protective factors for substance use consistent across historical time?: national data from the high school classes of 1976 through 1997.物质使用的风险因素和保护因素在不同历史时期是否一致?:来自1976年至1997年高中班级的全国数据。
Prev Sci. 2001 Mar;2(1):29-43. doi: 10.1023/a:1010034912070.
10
Reducing the harms caused by cannabis use: the policy debate in Australia.减少大麻使用造成的危害:澳大利亚的政策辩论。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001 May 1;62(3):163-74. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00171-x.