Suppr超能文献

一次性同心针肌电图电极的记录与物理特性

Recording and physical characteristics of disposable concentric needle EMG electrodes.

作者信息

Nandedkar S D, Tedman B, Sanders D B

机构信息

Division of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 1990 Oct;13(10):909-14. doi: 10.1002/mus.880131004.

Abstract

There is currently considerable interest in using disposable concentric needle (CN) electrodes for clinical electromyography (EMG). To determine how these electrodes compare with reusable CN electrodes, we have compared signals recorded by these two electrode types from the same muscle in normal subjects. We also made similar recordings with two groups of reusable electrodes. There was no difference in the features of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) recorded by the two groups of reusable electrodes. Disposable electrodes performed satisfactorily in conventional EMG examination. However, compared to reusable electrodes, the disposable electrodes recorded MUAPs with smaller amplitude and area but with the same area:amplitude ratio and MUAP duration. The physical and electrical properties of the CNE groups were also investigated. Disposable electrodes had lower electrical resistance and greater capacitance than reusable electrodes when measurements were made in saline. Photomicrographs showed that the disposable electrodes had smaller recording surfaces and that the central wire was frequently eccentric in the cannula. The differences in electrical recording characteristics could be due to differences in the size of the recording surface, eccentric placement of the central wire in the cannula or differences in the metal used for the central wire. We conclude that electrical and physical testing may not predict the recording characteristics of needle electrodes. Electrophysiologic testing is necessary to determine how EMG signals recorded by new types of electrodes compare with those recorded by currently used electrodes.

摘要

目前,一次性同心针电极用于临床肌电图(EMG)受到了广泛关注。为了确定这些电极与可重复使用的同心针电极相比如何,我们比较了这两种电极类型在正常受试者同一肌肉中记录的信号。我们还用两组可重复使用的电极进行了类似的记录。两组可重复使用电极记录的运动单位动作电位(MUAPs)特征没有差异。一次性电极在常规肌电图检查中表现令人满意。然而,与可重复使用电极相比,一次性电极记录的MUAPs振幅和面积较小,但面积与振幅之比和MUAP持续时间相同。我们还研究了同心针电极组的物理和电学特性。在盐水中测量时,一次性电极的电阻比可重复使用电极低,电容比可重复使用电极大。显微照片显示,一次性电极的记录表面较小,中心导线在套管中经常偏心。电记录特性的差异可能是由于记录表面大小、中心导线在套管中的偏心放置或中心导线所用金属的差异。我们得出结论,电学和物理测试可能无法预测针电极的记录特性。有必要进行电生理测试,以确定新型电极记录的肌电图信号与目前使用的电极记录的信号相比如何。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验