Diagnostica Ematochimica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Italy.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2012 Jan-Feb;49(1):18-31. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2012.658354.
Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreas, which might extend to local and distant extrapancreatic tissues. The global incidence varies between 17.5 and 73.4 cases per 100,000 and the pathogenesis recognizes alcohol exposure and biliary tract disease as the leading causes, ahead of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, drugs and abdominal trauma. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is substantially based on a combination of clinical signs and symptoms, imaging techniques and laboratory investigations. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is the reference standard for the diagnosis, as well as for establishing disease severity. The assessment of pancreatic enzymes, early released from necrotic tissue, is the cornerstone of laboratory diagnosis in this clinical setting. Although there is no single test that shows optimal diagnostic accuracy, most current guidelines and recommendations indicate that lipase should be preferred over total and pancreatic amylase. Although a definitive diagnostic threshold cannot be identified, cut-offs comprised between ≥ 2 and ≥ 4 times the upper limit of the reference interval are preferable. The combination of amylase and lipase has been discouraged as although it marginally improves the diagnostic efficiency of either marker alone, it increases the cost of investigation. Some interesting biomarkers have been also suggested (e.g., serum and urinary trypsinogen-1, -2 and -3, phospholipase A2, pancreatic elastase, procalcitonin, trypsinogen activated protein, activation peptide of carboxypeptidase B, trypsin-2-alpha1 antitrypsin complex and circulating DNA), but none of them has found widespread application for a variety of reasons, including the inferior diagnostic accuracy when compared with the traditional enzymes, the use of cumbersome techniques, or their recent discovery. The promising results of recent proteomics studies showed that this innovative technique might allow the identification of changes characterizing pancreatic tissue injury, thus highlighting new potential biomarkers of acute pancreatitis.
急性胰腺炎是一种胰腺的急性炎症性疾病,可能会延伸至局部和远处的胰腺外组织。全球发病率在每 10 万人中有 17.5 至 73.4 例之间,其发病机制将酒精暴露和胆道疾病认定为主要原因,排在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术、药物和腹部创伤之后。急性胰腺炎的诊断主要基于临床症状和体征、影像学技术和实验室检查的综合判断。增强 CT 是诊断的参考标准,也是确定疾病严重程度的标准。从坏死组织中早期释放的胰腺酶的评估是这种临床情况下实验室诊断的基石。尽管没有单一的测试可以显示出最佳的诊断准确性,但大多数当前的指南和建议表明,在这种临床情况下,应该优先选择脂肪酶而不是总淀粉酶和胰腺淀粉酶。虽然无法确定明确的诊断阈值,但在参考区间上限的 2 至 4 倍之间的截定点是优选的。尽管联合检测淀粉酶和脂肪酶可以略微提高单一标志物的诊断效率,但会增加检查成本,因此不鼓励联合检测。已经提出了一些有趣的生物标志物(例如,血清和尿液胰蛋白酶原-1、-2 和 -3、磷脂酶 A2、胰腺弹性蛋白酶、降钙素原、胰蛋白酶原激活蛋白、羧肽酶 B 激活肽、胰蛋白酶-2-alpha1 抗胰蛋白酶复合物和循环 DNA),但由于与传统酶相比诊断准确性较低、使用繁琐的技术或最近发现等原因,它们都没有得到广泛应用。最近蛋白质组学研究的有前景结果表明,这种创新技术可能允许识别特征性胰腺组织损伤的变化,从而突出急性胰腺炎的新潜在生物标志物。