• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An academic-health service partnership in nursing: lessons from the field.护理领域的学术-卫生服务伙伴关系:经验教训。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012 Mar;44(1):71-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01432.x. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
2
Leading through collaboration: a regional academic/service partnership that works.通过合作引领:一个行之有效的区域学术/服务伙伴关系。
Nurs Outlook. 2007 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.01.002.
3
Collaboration: aligning resources to create and sustain partnerships.合作:整合资源以建立并维持伙伴关系。
J Prof Nurs. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):310-22. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.07.009.
4
The Carolina nursing experience: a service perspective on an academic-service partnership.卡罗莱纳州的护理经验:从服务角度看学术与服务的伙伴关系。
J Prof Nurs. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):305-9. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.07.008.
5
A present-day academic perspective on the Carolina nursing experience: building on the past, shaping the future.当今对卡罗莱纳州护理经验的学术观点:立足过去,塑造未来。
J Prof Nurs. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):300-4. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.07.005.
6
Mutual Benefits of a Service-Learning Community-Academic Partnership.服务学习社区-学术伙伴关系的互利共赢。
J Nurs Educ. 2020 Feb 1;59(2):93-96. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200122-07.
7
Career coaching: innovative academic-practice partnership for professional development.职业指导:促进专业发展的创新型学术与实践伙伴关系。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2014 May;45(5):205-9; quiz 210 -1. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20140417-02. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
8
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
9
Developing dual role nursing staff-clinical instructor: a partnership model.培养双重角色护理人员-临床讲师:伙伴关系模式。
J Nurs Adm. 2014 Feb;44(2):65-7. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000025.
10
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting Novice Nurses' Transition to Independent Practice: Evaluation of the TIPS Program Using the Kirkpatrick Model.支持新手护士向独立执业过渡:使用柯克帕特里克模型对TIPS项目进行评估
Nurs Rep. 2025 Feb 1;15(2):50. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15020050.
2
Exploring unfinished nursing care among nursing students: a discussion paper.探索护理专业学生中未完成的护理工作:一篇讨论文章。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 18;22(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01445-z.
3
Nurse academic-practice partnerships in justice systems: Building upon the evidence.司法系统中的护士学术-实践伙伴关系:基于证据
J Prof Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;40:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
A critical realist synthesis of cross-disciplinary health policy and systems research: defining characteristic features, developing an evaluation framework and identifying challenges.跨学科卫生政策和系统研究的关键现实主义综合:定义特征、制定评估框架和确定挑战。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jul 14;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00556-2.
5
Learning in Practice: Collaboration Is the Way to Improve Health System Outcomes.实践中的学习:合作是改善卫生系统成果的途径。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Jul 9;7(3):90. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7030090.
6
Barriers and facilitators to implementing delirium rounds in a clinical trial across three diverse hospital settings.在三种不同医院环境中开展的一项临床试验里实施谵妄查房的障碍与促进因素
Clin Nurs Res. 2014 Apr;23(2):201-15. doi: 10.1177/1054773813505321. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
7
Development of a regional nursing research partnership for academic and practice collaborations.建立一个用于学术与实践合作的区域护理研究伙伴关系。
Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:473864. doi: 10.1155/2013/473864. Epub 2013 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Suitability of capillary blood glucose analysis in patients receiving vasopressors.血管加压素治疗患者毛细血管血糖分析的适用性。
Am J Crit Care. 2013 Sep;22(5):423-9. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013692.
2
Alcohol withdrawal prevention: a randomized evaluation of lorazepam and ethanol--a pilot study.酒精戒断预防:氯羟安定和乙醇的随机评估——一项初步研究。
Am J Crit Care. 2013 Sep;22(5):398-406. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013283.
3
Development of a health information technology-based data system in community-based hospice and palliative care.开发基于健康信息技术的社区临终关怀和姑息治疗数据系统。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5 Suppl 2):S217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.012.
4
Moving toward synergy: lessons learned in developing and sustaining community-academic partnerships.迈向协同合作:发展与维持社区-学术伙伴关系的经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Spring;5(1):27-34. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0003.
5
The rural pipeline: building a strong nursing workforce through academic and service partnerships.农村管道:通过学术和服务伙伴关系建立强大的护理劳动力
Nurs Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;46(1):107-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
6
Systematic review: process of forming academic service partnerships to reform clinical education.系统评价:构建学术服务伙伴关系以改革临床教育的过程。
West J Nurs Res. 2012 Feb;34(1):118-41. doi: 10.1177/0193945910394380. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
7
Understanding the goals of service learning and community-based medical education: a systematic review.理解服务学习和以社区为基础的医学教育的目标:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2011 Feb;86(2):246-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182046481.
8
Towards evidence-based management: creating an informative database of nursing-sensitive indicators.迈向循证管理:创建一个有意义的护理敏感指标数据库。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Dec;42(4):358-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01364.x. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
9
Nursing-sensitive benchmarks for hospitals to gauge high-reliability performance.医院用于衡量高可靠性绩效的护理敏感基准。
J Healthc Qual. 2010 Nov-Dec;32(6):9-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00083.x.
10
Comparison of a computer assisted learning program to standard education tools in hospitalized heart failure patients.计算机辅助学习程序与标准教育工具在住院心力衰竭患者中的比较。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Sep;10(3):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

护理领域的学术-卫生服务伙伴关系:经验教训。

An academic-health service partnership in nursing: lessons from the field.

机构信息

Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012 Mar;44(1):71-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01432.x. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01432.x
PMID:22339774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3759746/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the development of an academic-health services partnership undertaken to improve use of evidence in clinical practice.

APPROACH

Academic health science schools and health service settings share common elements of their missions: to educate, participate in research, and excel in healthcare delivery, but differences in the business models, incentives, and approaches to problem solving can lead to differences in priorities. Thus, academic and health service settings do not naturally align their leadership structures or work processes. We established a common commitment to accelerate the appropriate use of evidence in clinical practice and created an organizational structure to optimize opportunities for partnering that would leverage shared resources to achieve our goal.

FINDINGS

A jointly governed and funded institute integrated existing activities from the academic and service sectors. Additional resources included clinical staff and student training and mentoring, a pilot research grant-funding program, and support to access existing data. Emergent developments include an appreciation for a wider range of investigative methodologies and cross-disciplinary teams with skills to integrate research in daily practice and improve patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

By developing an integrated leadership structure and commitment to shared goals, we developed a framework for integrating academic and health service resources, leveraging additional resources, and forming a mutually beneficial partnership to improve clinical outcomes for patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Structurally integrated academic-health service partnerships result in improved evidence-based patient care delivery and in a stronger foundation for generating new clinical knowledge, thus improving patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

描述为改善临床实践中证据的使用而建立的学术-卫生服务伙伴关系的发展情况。

方法

学术卫生科学学校和卫生服务机构在其使命中有共同的要素:教育、参与研究和在医疗保健提供方面表现出色,但商业模式、激励机制和解决问题的方法上的差异可能导致优先事项的不同。因此,学术和卫生服务机构并没有自然而然地协调其领导结构或工作流程。我们共同承诺加速临床实践中证据的合理使用,并建立了一个组织结构,以优化合作机会,利用共享资源实现我们的目标。

结果

一个共同管理和资助的机构整合了学术和服务部门现有的活动。额外的资源包括临床工作人员和学生的培训和指导、试点研究资助计划以及获取现有数据的支持。新出现的发展包括对更广泛的研究方法和跨学科团队的认可,这些团队具备将研究融入日常实践并改善患者结果的技能。

结论

通过制定综合领导结构和共同目标的承诺,我们为整合学术和卫生服务资源、利用额外资源以及建立互利的伙伴关系以改善患者临床结果奠定了框架。

临床相关性

结构上整合的学术-卫生服务伙伴关系可改善基于证据的患者护理服务,并为生成新的临床知识奠定更坚实的基础,从而改善患者的结果。