• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十五年持续改进西班牙加泰罗尼亚基层医疗 2 型糖尿病的质量护理。

Fifteen years of continuous improvement of quality care of type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care in Catalonia, Spain.

机构信息

Primary Care Center (PCC) La Mina, Sant Adrià de Besòs, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Mar;66(3):289-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02872.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02872.x
PMID:22340449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3584513/
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the evolution of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) quality indicators in primary care centers (PCC) as part of the Group for the Study of Diabetes in Primary Care (GEDAPS) Continuous Quality Improvement (GCQI) programme in Catalonia.

METHODS

Sequential cross-sectional studies were performed during 1993-2007. Process and outcome indicators in random samples of patients from each centre were collected. The results of each evaluation were returned to each centre to encourage the implementation of correcting interventions. Sixty-four different educational activities were performed during the study period with the participation of 2041 professionals.

RESULTS

Clinical records of 23,501 patients were evaluated. A significant improvement was observed in the determination of some annual process indicators: HbA(1c) (51.7% vs. 88.9%); total cholesterol (75.9% vs. 90.9%); albuminuria screening (33.9% vs. 59.4%) and foot examination (48.9% vs. 64.2%). The intermediate outcome indicators also showed significant improvements: glycemic control [HbA(1c) ≤ 7% (< 57 mmol/mol); (41.5% vs. 64.2%)]; total cholesterol [≤ 200 mg/dl (5.17 mmol/l); (25.5% vs. 65.6%)]; blood pressure [≤ 140/90 mmHg; (45.4% vs. 66.1%)]. In addition, a significant improvement in some final outcome indicators such as prevalence of foot ulcers (7.6% vs. 2.6%); amputations (1.9% vs. 0.6%) and retinopathy (18.8% vs. 8.6%) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although those changes should not be strictly attributed to the GCQI programme, significant improvements in some process indicators, parameters of control and complications were observed in a network of primary care centres in Catalonia.

摘要

目的

评估 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)质量指标在初级保健中心(PCC)的演变情况,该研究为加泰罗尼亚初级保健糖尿病研究组(GEDAPS)持续质量改进(GCQI)计划的一部分。

方法

在 1993 年至 2007 年期间进行了一系列的横断面研究。从每个中心的随机患者样本中收集了过程和结果指标。每次评估的结果都会反馈给每个中心,以鼓励实施纠正干预措施。在研究期间,共开展了 64 项不同的教育活动,有 2041 名专业人员参与。

结果

共评估了 23501 名患者的临床记录。一些年度过程指标的测定有显著改善:糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(51.7% vs. 88.9%);总胆固醇(75.9% vs. 90.9%);白蛋白尿筛查(33.9% vs. 59.4%)和足部检查(48.9% vs. 64.2%)。中间结果指标也有显著改善:血糖控制[糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≤7%(<57mmol/mol);(41.5% vs. 64.2%)];总胆固醇[≤200mg/dl(5.17mmol/l);(25.5% vs. 65.6%)];血压[≤140/90mmHg;(45.4% vs. 66.1%)]。此外,一些最终结果指标的患病率也有显著改善,如足部溃疡(7.6% vs. 2.6%);截肢(1.9% vs. 0.6%)和视网膜病变(18.8% vs. 8.6%)。

结论

尽管这些变化不应严格归因于 GCQI 计划,但在加泰罗尼亚的初级保健中心网络中,观察到一些过程指标、控制参数和并发症的显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9985/3584513/377a52c0ca4c/ijcp0066-0289-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9985/3584513/377a52c0ca4c/ijcp0066-0289-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9985/3584513/377a52c0ca4c/ijcp0066-0289-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Fifteen years of continuous improvement of quality care of type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care in Catalonia, Spain.十五年持续改进西班牙加泰罗尼亚基层医疗 2 型糖尿病的质量护理。
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Mar;66(3):289-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02872.x.
2
Identifying effective pathways in a successful continuous quality improvement programme: the GEDAPS study.在一项成功的持续质量改进计划中确定有效途径:GEDAPS研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):1137-43. doi: 10.1111/jep.12253. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
3
The impact of a programme to improve quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes on hard to reach groups: The GEDAPS study.一项旨在改善2型糖尿病患者护理质量的项目对难以接触到的群体的影响:GEDAPS研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2015 Jun;9(3):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
4
HbA(1c) in adults without known diabetes from southern Europe. Impact of the new diagnostic criteria in clinical practice.HbA(1c) 在欧洲南部无已知糖尿病的成年人中的情况。新诊断标准在临床实践中的影响。
Diabet Med. 2011 Nov;28(11):1319-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03317.x. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
5
Sustainability and effectiveness of comprehensive diabetes care to a district population.针对某地区人群的糖尿病综合护理的可持续性与有效性。
Diabet Med. 2004 Nov;21(11):1221-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01324.x.
6
Trends in chronic complications of type 2 diabetic patients from Spanish primary health care centres (GEDAPS study): ten year-implementation of St. Vincent recommendations.来自西班牙初级卫生保健中心的 2 型糖尿病患者慢性并发症的趋势(GEDAPS 研究):圣文森特建议的十年实施情况。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Apr;6(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
7
Glycaemic control and implementation of the ADA/EASD-2006 consensus algorithm in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in primary care in Spain.西班牙初级保健中2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制及ADA/EASD-2006共识算法的实施情况
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Jan;68(1):28-39. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12251.
8
Does good clinical practice at the primary care improve the outcome care for diabetic patients? Gender differences.初级保健中的良好临床实践是否能改善糖尿病患者的治疗结局?基于性别的差异。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Dec;6(4):285-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 22.
9
[Structured treatment and teaching programs and an improvement in private health care lead to a better quality of diabetes care. JEVIN, a population-based trial 1989/90 up to 1999/2000].[结构化治疗与教学项目以及私人医疗保健的改善带来了更高质量的糖尿病护理。JEVIN,一项基于人群的试验,时间跨度从1989/90年至1999/2000年]
Med Klin (Munich). 2003 Jun 15;98(6):303-12. doi: 10.1007/s00063-003-1264-y.
10
Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002.糖尿病护理流程及中间结果的改善:美国,1988 - 2002年
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):465-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of Primary Care Physicians in the Management of Glycemia, Lipids, and Blood Pressure among People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.2型糖尿病患者中基层医疗医生在血糖、血脂和血压管理方面的表现:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 7;13(6):1544. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061544.
2
Variability in the Control of Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care and Its Association with Hospital Admissions for Vascular Events. The APNA Study.基层医疗中2型糖尿病控制的变异性及其与血管事件住院治疗的关联。APNA研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 14;10(24):5854. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245854.
3
Identification of Five Quality Needs for Rheumatology (Text Analysis and Literature Review).

本文引用的文献

1
Multifactorial control and treatment intensity of type-2 diabetes in primary care settings in Catalonia.加泰罗尼亚初级保健环境中 2 型糖尿病的多因素控制和治疗强度。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010 Mar 29;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-14.
2
[The evolution of quality care indicators of patients with type 2 diabetes in the Spanish primary care (1996-2007). The RedGEDAPS quality of care program].[西班牙初级保健中2型糖尿病患者优质护理指标的演变(1996 - 2007年)。RedGEDAPS护理质量计划]
Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Nov 6;135(13):600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.06.033. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
3
The effect of feedback to general practitioners on quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of the literature.
确定风湿病学的五个质量需求(文本分析与文献综述)
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 25;8:757102. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.757102. eCollection 2021.
4
Effectiveness of a comprehensive care protocol in patients with new diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus and associated comorbidities in primary care: study protocol of a quasi-experimental trial.综合护理方案对初诊 2 型糖尿病及相关合并症患者的疗效:一项准实验研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 23;10(6):e033725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033725.
5
Toward Standardized Monitoring of Patients With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care Using Electronic Medical Records: Systematic Review.利用电子病历对基层医疗中慢性病患者进行标准化监测:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 May 24;7(2):e10879. doi: 10.2196/10879.
6
[Prevalence and risk factors associated with diabetic retinopathy in Santander. Northern Spain].[西班牙北部桑坦德市糖尿病视网膜病变的患病率及相关危险因素]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Jan;52(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.10.001. Epub 2019 May 17.
7
INTEGRA study protocol: primary care intervention in type 2 diabetes patients with poor glycaemic control.INTEGRA 研究方案:血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的初级保健干预。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 7;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0916-9.
8
Type 2 diabetes and quality of life.2型糖尿病与生活质量。
World J Diabetes. 2017 Apr 15;8(4):120-129. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i4.120.
9
Pharmaceutical cost and multimorbidity with type 2 diabetes mellitus using electronic health record data.利用电子健康记录数据分析2型糖尿病的药物成本与多种疾病并存情况
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1649-2.
10
Characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus newly treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists (CHADIG Study): a cross-sectional multicentre study in Spain.接受胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂初始治疗的2型糖尿病患者特征(CHADIG研究):西班牙的一项横断面多中心研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 26;6(7):e010197. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010197.
向全科医生提供反馈对2型糖尿病患者护理质量的影响。文献系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 May 6;10:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-30.
4
Population intermediate outcomes of diabetes under pay-for-performance incentives in England from 2004 to 2008.2004年至2008年英国按绩效付费激励措施下糖尿病的人群中间结局
Diabetes Care. 2009 Mar;32(3):427-9. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1999. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
5
Quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in Norway is improving: results of cross-sectional surveys of 33 general practices in 1995 and 2005.挪威基层医疗中 2 型糖尿病患者的护理质量正在改善:1995 年和 2005 年对 33 家普通诊所进行的横断面调查结果。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):81-3. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0605. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
6
Evaluation of a diabetes management system based on practice guidelines, integrated care, and continuous quality management in a Federal State of Germany: a population-based approach to health care research.在德国一个联邦州对基于实践指南、综合护理和持续质量管理的糖尿病管理系统进行评估:一种基于人群的医疗保健研究方法。
Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):863-8. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0858. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
7
Quality of diabetes care in the UK: comparison of published quality-of-care reports with results of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for Diabetes.英国糖尿病护理质量:已发表的护理质量报告与糖尿病质量与结果框架结果的比较。
Diabet Med. 2007 Dec;24(12):1436-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02276.x. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
8
Five-year impact of a continuous quality improvement effort implemented by a network of diabetes outpatient clinics.糖尿病门诊诊所网络实施的持续质量改进措施的五年影响。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jan;31(1):57-62. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1515. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
9
Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice.使用过程指标来监测临床实践质量。
BMJ. 2007 Sep 29;335(7621):648-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39317.641296.AD.
10
Control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care. The gap between guidelines and reality in Spain.初级保健中2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病及心血管危险因素控制。西班牙指南与现实之间的差距。
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Jun;61(6):909-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01367.x.