McMillan Rhona, Cameron Niall, Power Ailsa
NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow G3 8BW, UK.
Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(6):347-54.
The ability to consult effectively is key to the delivery of quality patient care. External peer review of consultations has been available to general medical practitioners (GPs) in the west of Scotland for several years. Pharmacists are expected to provide increasingly complex advice for patients. This study describes the development and first steps in the evaluation of a generic tool to be used to inform feedback about both GP and pharmacist consultations with patients.
The tool was developed by a small group of GPs and tested for validity using a content validity inventory. An item correlation pilot (ICP) was carried out. Three experienced reviewers reviewed and scored three consultations in each of six GP tapes, a further three reviewers reviewed and scored three consultations in each of four pharmacists' tapes. The results underwent statistical analysis.
Pharmacists do not examine patients and so two similar instruments were developed, whereby two questions pertinent to patient examination were omitted from the pharmacist instrument. The content validity inventory demonstrated aspects of face validity and content validity of instruments. Statistical analysis of GP tapes suggested that the instrument could discriminate between GP consultations. Skills demonstrated by pharmacists were given lower scores, were less consistent than the GPs and the instrument did not discriminate between those performing at different levels.
The results suggest that the instrument is useful only when applied to practitioners who have been taught how to consult in a patientcentred manner, and have led to the introduction of training in consultation skills for pharmacists throughout Scotland. Potential reliability in providing peer feedback for GP consultations is important in the context of the provision of consistent, meaningful evidence for GP appraisal and revalidation in the UK.
有效会诊的能力是提供高质量患者护理的关键。在苏格兰西部,普通执业医师(GP)多年来一直可以接受会诊的外部同行评审。药剂师预计要为患者提供日益复杂的建议。本研究描述了一种通用工具的开发及评估的初步步骤,该工具用于为关于GP和药剂师与患者会诊的反馈提供信息。
该工具由一小群GP开发,并使用内容效度量表测试其有效性。进行了项目相关性试点(ICP)。三位经验丰富的评审员对六份GP录音带中的每份录音带中的三次会诊进行评审和评分,另外三位评审员对四份药剂师录音带中的每份录音带中的三次会诊进行评审和评分。对结果进行统计分析。
药剂师不检查患者,因此开发了两种类似的工具,药剂师工具中省略了两个与患者检查相关的问题。内容效度量表展示了工具的表面效度和内容效度方面。对GP录音带的统计分析表明该工具可以区分GP会诊。药剂师展示的技能得分较低,不如GP一致,并且该工具无法区分不同水平的表现者。
结果表明,该工具仅适用于那些已接受以患者为中心的会诊培训的从业者,并且已促使在苏格兰各地为药剂师引入会诊技能培训。在为英国的GP评估和重新验证提供一致、有意义的证据的背景下,为GP会诊提供同行反馈的潜在可靠性很重要。