Adam Jos J, Scholtissen Bart, Marí-Beffa Paloma
Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences & School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Mar;139(3):465-70. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
Using a finger cuing paradigm, we investigated response preparation in Parkinson's disease (PD). The central question was whether PD individuals are differentially affected by preparatory cues that specify a more automatic response set configuration (that induces within-hand preparation) as opposed to a more controlled one (that induces between-hands preparation). Reaction times (RTs) and error rates were measured in 20 non-demented individuals with PD and 20 healthy control participants with a long and short preparation interval (500 ms and 2000 ms). RT benefits and/or costs were measured for cues indicating a within- and between-hands motor preparatory set. Overall, RTs were significantly longer, and errors more frequent, for PD participants than for control participants. More importantly, in comparison with control subjects, PD individuals showed a significant deficit in between-hands preparation but not in within-hand preparation. Furthermore, longer preparation intervals slowed down cued RTs of the control participants, but not those of the PD individuals. Together, these findings suggest that whereas automatic response preparation processes are spared in PD, controlled response preparation processes operate at a slower rate and/or are delayed in time.
我们采用手指提示范式研究了帕金森病(PD)患者的反应准备情况。核心问题是,与更具控制性的提示(诱导双手间准备)相比,指定更自动反应集配置(诱导手内准备)的准备性提示对PD患者的影响是否存在差异。在20名非痴呆PD患者和20名健康对照参与者中测量了反应时间(RTs)和错误率,准备间隔分为长间隔(2000毫秒)和短间隔(500毫秒)。测量了指示手内和双手运动准备集的提示的RT益处和/或成本。总体而言,PD参与者的RTs明显更长,错误更频繁。更重要的是,与对照受试者相比,PD患者在双手间准备方面存在显著缺陷,但在手内准备方面没有。此外,更长的准备间隔减慢了对照参与者的提示RTs,但对PD患者没有影响。这些发现共同表明,虽然PD患者的自动反应准备过程未受影响,但控制性反应准备过程的运作速度较慢和/或存在时间延迟。