Greenberg Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York 10065, USA.
J Hypertens. 2012 Apr;30(4):802-10; discussion 810. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283516499.
Hypertensive patients with ECG left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) are at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and regression of ECG LVH is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Although tighter control of systolic blood pressure (SBP) has been associated with a lower rate of ECG LVH, whether tighter vs. standard control of SBP is associated with greater reduction of cardiovascular risk is unclear.
Risk of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular death, the composite endpoint of these events and all-cause mortality were examined in relation to in-treatment achieved SBP in 9193 hypertensive patients with ECG LVH randomly assigned to losartan or atenolol-based treatment. Patients with in-treatment SBP 130 mmHg or less (lowest quintile at last measurement) and SBP between 131 and 141 mmHg were compared with patients with in-treatment SBP at least 142 mmHg (median SBP at last measurement). In univariate analyses, compared with in-treatment SBP at least 142 mmHg, in-treatment SBP between 131 and 141 mmHg entered as a time-varying covariate identified patients with significantly lower risk of all events. In contrast, patients with SBP 130 mmHg or less had less reduction in MI, stroke and composite endpoint and no significant decrease in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. In multivariate Cox analyses adjusting for baseline risk factors and randomized treatment as standard covariates and in-treatment diastolic BP, heart rate and Cornell product LVH as time-varying covariates, an in-treatment achieved SBP of 131 to 141 mmHg remained associated with a significantly decreased risk of MI, stroke and the LIFE composite endpoint. In contrast, patients who achieved a SBP 130 mmHg or less had no significant reduction in risk of MI, stroke or composite endpoint, had a trend to increased cardiovascular mortality [hazard ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.81, P = 0.078] and a statistically significant 37% increased risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.10-1.71, P = 0.005).
Achieved SBP 130 mmHg or less is not associated with lower cardiovascular risk than SBP of 131 to 141 mmHg and is associated with a significantly increased risk of death and trend towards increased cardiovascular mortality. These findings support the need for randomized evaluation of treatment to more aggressive vs. conventional SBP targets.
心电图左心室肥厚(LVH)的高血压患者心血管发病率和死亡率增加,心电图 LVH 消退与心血管结局改善相关。尽管收缩压(SBP)的严格控制与心电图 LVH 发生率降低有关,但严格控制与标准控制 SBP 相比是否与心血管风险降低更大仍不清楚。
在 9193 例心电图 LVH 的高血压患者中,根据治疗中达到的 SBP ,评估卒中、心肌梗死(MI)、心血管死亡、这些事件的复合终点和全因死亡率与治疗中 SBP 的关系。将治疗中 SBP 为 130mmHg 或更低(最后一次测量的最低五分位数)和 SBP 为 131-141mmHg 的患者与治疗中 SBP 至少为 142mmHg 的患者(最后一次测量的 SBP 中位数)进行比较。在单变量分析中,与治疗中 SBP 至少为 142mmHg 相比,作为时变协变量的治疗中 SBP 为 131-141mmHg 患者的所有事件风险显著降低。相比之下,SBP 为 130mmHg 或更低的患者 MI、卒中和复合终点的减少较少,心血管或全因死亡率没有显著下降。在调整基线风险因素和随机治疗作为标准协变量以及治疗中舒张压、心率和 Cornell 产品 LVH 作为时变协变量的多变量 Cox 分析中,治疗中达到的 SBP 为 131-141mmHg 仍与 MI、卒中和 LIFE 复合终点风险降低显著相关。相比之下,达到 SBP 130mmHg 或更低的患者 MI、卒中或复合终点的风险没有显著降低,心血管死亡率有增加趋势[危险比 1.32,95%置信区间(CI)0.97-1.81,P=0.078],任何原因导致的死亡风险增加 37%(危险比 1.37,95%CI 1.10-1.71,P=0.005)。
达到 SBP 130mmHg 或更低与 SBP 为 131-141mmHg 相比,与较低的心血管风险无关,与死亡风险显著增加和心血管死亡率增加趋势相关。这些发现支持需要对更积极与标准 SBP 目标的治疗进行随机评估。