Suppr超能文献

卡哈尔鲍姆综合征是否已经消失,还是被低估诊断了?重新审视紧张症的分类学。

Has Kahlbaum syndrome disappeared or is it underdiagnosed? Reexamining the nosology of catatonia.

出版信息

J ECT. 2012 Mar;28(1):62-3. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318223c3f5.

Abstract

In contemporary psychiatric classification such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, catatonia is classified as a subtype of schizophrenia and not as an independent disorder. However, catatonia does not seem to obey nosological boundaries and is seen with both affective and nonaffective psychoses. We conducted a chart review of patients to examine the nosological status of catatonia. Our data suggest that catatonia is a syndrome of varied manifestation possibly related to both affective and nonaffective psychoses with a subgroup independent of both. Further prospective studies examining the natural course are needed, which could have significant implications on future classificatory systems.

摘要

在当代精神病学分类中,如《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版和《国际疾病分类》第 10 版,紧张症被归类为精神分裂症的一种亚型,而不是一种独立的障碍。然而,紧张症似乎并不遵守疾病分类学的边界,在情感性和非情感性精神病中都可见到。我们进行了病历回顾,以检查紧张症的疾病分类地位。我们的数据表明,紧张症是一种表现多样的综合征,可能与情感性和非情感性精神病都有关,其中一个亚组与两者都无关。需要进一步进行前瞻性研究来检查其自然病程,这可能对未来的分类系统产生重大影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验