School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 May;26(5):1265-73. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824f2351.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of 3 different exercise interventions plus a control group on passive hip range of motion (ROM). Previous research studies into the methods of improving passive hip mobility have focused on stretching protocols aimed specifically at the hip joint. The effect of core stabilization, motor training, and myofascial stretching techniques on hip mobility in a selected asymptomatic group with limited hip mobility is unclear. In this study, 24 young men with limited hip mobility (<50th percentile) were randomly assigned to 4 groups: stretching, stretching with motor control exercises for the hip and trunk, core endurance with motor control exercises, and the control group. Six-week home exercise programs were individually prescribed based on the assigned group, hip ROM, movement patterns, and timed core endurance. Two-way analyses of variances were conducted to analyze the effect of group assignment on hip ROM improvements. Both stretching groups demonstrated significant improvements in hip ROM (p < 0.05), attaining hip mobility levels at or above the 75th percentile, with rotation improving as much as 56%. The group receiving core endurance and motor control exercises with no stretching also demonstrated a moderate increase in ROM but only significantly so in rotation. Average core endurance holding times improved 38-53%. These results indicate that stretches aimed at the myofascial components of the upper body, in addition to the hip joint, resulted in dramatic increases in hip ROM in a group of young men with limited hip mobility. Hip ROM also improved in the group that did no active stretching, highlighting the potential role of including stabilization or "proximal stiffening training" when rehabilitating the extremities.
本研究的目的是分析 3 种不同的运动干预措施加对照组对被动髋关节活动范围(ROM)的影响。先前关于改善被动髋关节活动度的研究方法主要集中在专门针对髋关节的伸展方案上。核心稳定性、运动训练和筋膜拉伸技术对活动度有限的无症状组髋关节活动度的影响尚不清楚。在这项研究中,24 名活动度有限(<第 50 百分位)的年轻男性被随机分配到 4 组:伸展组、伸展加髋关节和躯干运动控制练习组、核心耐力加运动控制练习组和对照组。根据分配的组、髋关节 ROM、运动模式和定时核心耐力,为每个组单独制定了 6 周的家庭运动计划。采用双向方差分析来分析组分配对髋关节 ROM 改善的影响。两组伸展组的髋关节 ROM 均有显著改善(p<0.05),达到或超过第 75 百分位的髋关节活动度水平,旋转改善高达 56%。未进行伸展但接受核心耐力和运动控制练习的组也表现出 ROM 的适度增加,但仅在旋转方面显著增加。核心耐力保持时间平均提高了 38-53%。这些结果表明,针对上半身筋膜成分的伸展,除了髋关节外,还会导致活动度有限的年轻男性髋关节 ROM 显著增加。在不进行主动伸展的组中,髋关节 ROM 也得到改善,这突出了在康复四肢时包括稳定性或“近端僵硬训练”的潜在作用。