• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用两种不同比例尺标记对数字化骨盆X线片进行自动校准的准确性:一项对比研究。

The accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using two different scale markers: a comparative study.

作者信息

Baxter Jonathan A, Barlow Timothy, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, Mayo Damian J, King Richard J

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):82-9. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9044.

DOI:10.5301/HIP.2012.9044
PMID:22344481
Abstract

We have investigated the accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using the single and double marker techniques. Both markers were applied by the radiographer at the time of routine, postoperative radiographs. Each radiograph was loaded into the TraumaCad(TM) software package which calculated the magnification and scaled the radiograph automatically. The median error of magnification in the double marker group was 1.14% when calculated automatically. The median error of the single marker was 5.98%. The relationship between true and predicted magnification was strongest in the double marker group with excellent correlation (r=0.91) and agreement (ICC<0.91). We believe that the double marker method with automatic calibration is the most reliable method of scaling a pelvic radiograph in clinical practice currently available.

摘要

我们使用单标记和双标记技术研究了数字骨盆X线片自动校准的准确性。两种标记均由放射技师在术后常规X线检查时应用。每张X线片被加载到TraumaCad(TM)软件包中,该软件会自动计算放大倍数并对X线片进行缩放。双标记组自动计算时放大倍数的中位数误差为1.14%。单标记的中位数误差为5.98%。双标记组中真实放大倍数与预测放大倍数之间的关系最强,具有极佳的相关性(r=0.91)和一致性(组内相关系数<0.91)。我们认为,具有自动校准功能的双标记方法是目前临床实践中缩放骨盆X线片最可靠的方法。

相似文献

1
The accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using two different scale markers: a comparative study.使用两种不同比例尺标记对数字化骨盆X线片进行自动校准的准确性:一项对比研究。
Hip Int. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):82-9. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9044.
2
A novel method of accurately calculating the radiological magnification of the hip.一种精确计算髋关节放射放大率的新方法。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Sep;91(9):1217-22. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B9.22615.
3
Inaccuracies in the Use of Magnification Markers in Digital Hip Radiographs.数字化髋关节X线片中放大标记使用的不准确情况。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1812-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4704-8. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
Fast and accurate automated measurements in digitized stereophotogrammetric radiographs.数字化立体摄影测量X线片中的快速准确自动测量
J Biomech. 1998 May;31(5):491-8. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00025-6.
5
Scaling digital radiographs for templating in total hip arthroplasty using conventional acetate templates independent of calibration markers.在全髋关节置换术中使用传统醋酸纤维模板,不依赖校准标记进行数字射线照相的模板缩放。
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Apr;27(4):643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
6
Evaluation and Comparison of Self-Made and Commercial Calibration Markers for Radiographic Magnification Correction in Veterinary Digital Radiography.自制和商用校准标记在兽医数字放射摄影中放射放大校正的评估和比较。
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jan;35(1):10-17. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735316. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
7
The magnification of digital radiographs in the trauma patient: implications for templating.数字 X 射线摄影在创伤患者中的放大倍数:对模板的影响。
Injury. 2009 Feb;40(2):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.027. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
8
Statistical model-based segmentation of the proximal femur in digital antero-posterior (AP) pelvic radiographs.基于统计模型的数字前后位(AP)骨盆 X 线片中股骨近端的分割。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 Mar;9(2):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s11548-013-0932-5. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
9
Assessment of on-screen measurements, magnification, and calibration in digital radiography.数字放射摄影中屏幕测量、放大率及校准的评估
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012 Sep 15;241(6):782-7. doi: 10.2460/javma.241.6.782.
10
Digital correction of magnification in pelvic x rays for preoperative planning of hip joint replacements: theoretical development and clinical results of a new protocol.用于髋关节置换术前规划的骨盆X线放大率数字校正:一种新方案的理论发展与临床结果
Med Phys. 2005 Aug;32(8):2580-9. doi: 10.1118/1.1984293.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Preoperative Templating in Total Hip Replacement Surgery: KingMark™ Dual-Marker System Versus Single-Marker Method.全髋关节置换手术中术前模板的比较分析:KingMark™双标记系统与单标记法
Cureus. 2025 May 5;17(5):e83501. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83501. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Digital templating for THA planning; efficiency and accuracy improves with institutional familiarity.用于全髋关节置换术(THA)规划的数字模板;随着机构熟悉度的提高,效率和准确性也会提升。
J Orthop. 2025 Jan 6;67:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.12.017. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Reliably calibrating X-ray images required for preoperative planning of THA using a device-adapted magnification factor.
使用设备适配的放大系数,可靠地校准 THA 术前规划所需的 X 射线图像。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 22;19(8):e0307259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307259. eCollection 2024.
4
The effect of patient body mass index and sex on the magnification factor during pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty.患者体重指数和性别对全髋关节置换术前模板测量时放大系数的影响。
SICOT J. 2023;9:13. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2023009. Epub 2023 May 15.
5
The accuracy of external calibration markers in digital templating using the double marker and single marker method: a comparative study.双标记法和单标记法数字化模板中外置校准标记的准确性:一项对比研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1559-1565. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03569-2. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Templating Hip Arthroplasty.模板髋关节置换术
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 23;7(4):672-685. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.088. eCollection 2019 Feb 28.
7
Influence of calibration on digital templating of hip arthroplasty.校准对髋关节置换术数字化模板的影响。
Int Orthop. 2019 Aug;43(8):1799-1805. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4120-7. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
8
Dual-position calibration markers for total hip arthroplasty: theoretical comparison to fixed calibration and single marker method.全髋关节置换术中的双位置校准标记:与固定校准和单标记方法的理论比较。
Int Orthop. 2019 Mar;43(3):589-595. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4034-4. Epub 2018 Jun 20.