• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培塞丽珠联合甲氨蝶呤每四周给药对 MTX 部分应答的 RA 患者有效。

Certolizumab pegol plus MTX administered every 4 weeks is effective in patients with RA who are partial responders to MTX.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jul;51(7):1226-34. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker519. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/ker519
PMID:22344576
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is known to be effective as monotherapy at a dosage of 400  mg every 4 weeks in patients with active RA who have failed DMARDs. The aim of this study was to investigate every 4-week CZP in addition to continued MTX therapy in patients with an inadequate response to MTX alone.

METHODS

Patients with active RA with inadequate response to MTX, on background MTX, were randomized to double-blind treatment with CZP 400  mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (NCT00544154). The primary efficacy end-point was the ACR 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at Week 24. Other end-points included ACR50 and ACR70 response rates, ACR core components, 28-joint DAS (ESR) with three variables (DAS28-3) and health-related quality-of-life outcomes in addition to safety.

RESULTS

Of 247 randomized patients, 126 received CZP and 121 received placebo, in addition to MTX. ACR20 response rates were 45.9 vs 22.9%, respectively [P < 0.001 analysed by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method], with improvements being apparent from Week 1. Statistically significant improvements over placebo were seen with CZP for ACR50, ACR core components, DAS28-3 and physical functioning. Rates of treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (25.0 vs 27.7%), and there were no deaths or serious opportunistic infections.

CONCLUSION

CZP 400  mg every 4 weeks plus MTX demonstrated a favourable risk-benefit profile with rapid onset of action in RA patients with an inadequate response to an earlier MTX therapy.

摘要

目的

在对 DMARDs 治疗反应不佳的活动期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中,培塞利珠单抗(CZP)作为单药治疗,每 4 周给药 400mg 时,具有显著疗效。本研究旨在评估在对甲氨蝶呤(MTX)单药治疗反应不足的患者中,每 4 周给予 CZP 联合 MTX 治疗的疗效。

方法

在 MTX 治疗反应不足的活动期 RA 患者中,在 MTX 背景治疗下,患者随机接受 CZP 400mg 或安慰剂每 4 周一次的双盲治疗,共 24 周(NCT00544154)。主要疗效终点为第 24 周时 ACR20 缓解率。其他终点包括 ACR50 和 ACR70 缓解率、ACR 核心指标、28 关节疾病活动度(DAS)(红细胞沉降率)(ESR)三个变量(DAS28-3)和健康相关生活质量。

结果

在 247 例随机患者中,126 例患者接受 CZP 治疗,121 例患者接受安慰剂治疗,同时接受 MTX 治疗。ACR20 缓解率分别为 45.9%和 22.9%[Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel(CMH)分析,P<0.001],从第 1 周开始就有明显改善。与安慰剂相比,CZP 可显著改善 ACR50、ACR 核心指标、DAS28-3 和躯体功能。两组治疗相关不良事件发生率相似(25.0%和 27.7%),无死亡或严重机会性感染。

结论

培塞利珠单抗 400mg 每 4 周一次联合 MTX 治疗,对 MTX 治疗反应不足的 RA 患者具有良好的风险效益比,起效迅速。

相似文献

1
Certolizumab pegol plus MTX administered every 4 weeks is effective in patients with RA who are partial responders to MTX.培塞丽珠联合甲氨蝶呤每四周给药对 MTX 部分应答的 RA 患者有效。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jul;51(7):1226-34. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker519. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
2
Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate: the J-RAPID randomized, placebo-controlled trial.聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤治疗对甲氨蝶呤反应不足的日本类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性:J-RAPID随机、安慰剂对照试验
Mod Rheumatol. 2014 Sep;24(5):715-24. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.864224. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
3
Certolizumab pegol (CIMZIA®) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.培塞利珠单抗(喜达诺)治疗类风湿关节炎。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(Suppl. 2):1-10. doi: 10.3310/hta14suppl2/01.
4
Long-term efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients who could not receive methotrexate: 52-week results from an open-label extension of the HIKARI study.聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗在无法接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的日本类风湿关节炎患者中的长期疗效和安全性:HIKARI研究开放标签扩展的52周结果
Mod Rheumatol. 2014 Sep;24(5):725-33. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.865822. Epub 2013 Dec 29.
5
Sustained efficacy of certolizumab pegol added to methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from the RAPID 1 trial.依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎的 2 年疗效:RAPID 1 试验的 2 年结果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Sep;51(9):1628-38. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes082. Epub 2012 May 16.
6
Dose escalation of certolizumab pegol from 200 mg to 400 mg every other week provides no additional efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis of individual patient-level data.每两周将赛妥珠单抗聚乙二醇化制剂剂量从200毫克增至400毫克对类风湿性关节炎并无额外疗效:个体患者水平数据的分析
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Aug;63(8):2203-8. doi: 10.1002/art.30387.
7
Two dosing regimens of certolizumab pegol in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.两种剂量的培塞丽珠单抗治疗活动期类风湿关节炎患者。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Feb;67(2):151-60. doi: 10.1002/acr.22496.
8
Certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate is significantly more effective than placebo plus methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis: findings of a fifty-two-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤在活动性类风湿关节炎的治疗中比安慰剂联合甲氨蝶呤显著更有效:一项为期52周的III期多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照平行组研究的结果。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov;58(11):3319-29. doi: 10.1002/art.23964.
9
Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol without methotrexate co-administration in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the HIKARI randomized, placebo-controlled trial.聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗单药治疗日本活动性类风湿关节炎患者的疗效和安全性:HIKARI随机、安慰剂对照试验
Mod Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;24(4):552-60. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.843764. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
10
Rapid and sustained improvements in health-related quality of life, fatigue, and other patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate over 1 year: results from the RAPID 1 randomized controlled trial.在接受培塞丽珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤治疗的类风湿关节炎患者中,健康相关生活质量、疲劳和其他患者报告结局在 1 年内迅速且持续改善:来自 RAPID 1 随机对照试验的结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(6):R170. doi: 10.1186/ar2859. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of rheumatoid factor levels and TNF inhibitor structure on secondary nonresponse in rheumatoid arthritis patients.类风湿因子水平和肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂结构对类风湿关节炎患者继发无应答的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 4;11:1461396. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1461396. eCollection 2024.
2
Estimating Patient-Specific Relative Benefit of Adding Biologics to Conventional Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.估算生物制剂加入常规类风湿关节炎治疗对患者个体获益的影响:一项个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2321398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21398.
3
Assessing Immunogenicity of Biologic Drugs in Inflammatory Joint Diseases: Progress Towards Personalized Medicine.
评估炎症性关节疾病中生物药物的免疫原性:迈向个体化医学的进展。
BioDrugs. 2022 Nov;36(6):731-748. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00559-1. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
4
Bayesian network meta-analysis methods for combining individual participant data and aggregate data from single arm trials and randomised controlled trials.贝叶斯网络荟萃分析方法,用于合并来自单臂试验和随机对照试验的个体参与者数据和汇总数据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01657-y.
5
Lessons From the Success and Failure of Targeted Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Perspectives for Effective Basic and Translational Research.类风湿关节炎靶向药物成功与失败的经验教训:有效基础研究与转化研究的展望
Immune Netw. 2022 Feb 22;22(1):e8. doi: 10.4110/in.2022.22.e8. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
The Risk of Adverse Effects of TNF-α Inhibitors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.类风湿关节炎患者使用 TNF-α 抑制剂的不良反应风险:一项网络荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 16;13:814429. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.814429. eCollection 2022.
7
Pegylation Reduces the Uptake of Certolizumab Pegol by Dendritic Cells and Epitope Presentation to T-Cells.聚乙二醇化降低了树突状细胞对培戈珠单抗的摄取和抗原呈递给 T 细胞。
Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 4;13:808606. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.808606. eCollection 2022.
8
Risk of Adverse Events After Anti-TNF Treatment for Inflammatory Rheumatological Disease. A Meta-Analysis.抗TNF治疗炎症性风湿性疾病后不良事件的风险。一项荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 1;12:746396. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.746396. eCollection 2021.
9
The Therapeutic Landscape of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current State and Future Directions.类风湿关节炎的治疗前景:现状与未来方向
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 28;12:680043. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.680043. eCollection 2021.
10
Comparative Efficacy (DAS28 Remission) of Targeted Immune Modulators for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.类风湿关节炎靶向免疫调节剂的比较疗效(DAS28缓解):一项网状Meta分析
Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Jun;8(2):693-710. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00322-y. Epub 2021 May 26.