Suppr超能文献

印度南部一家三级护理医院医生对安乐死的态度:一项横断面研究。

Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Doctors in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India: A Cross Sectional study.

作者信息

Kamath Sneha, Bhate Priya, Mathew Ginu, Sashidharan Srijith, Daniel Anjali B

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, India.

出版信息

Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Sep;17(3):197-201. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.92336.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Advances in expertise and equipment have enabled the medical profession to exercise more control over the processes of life and death, creating a number of moral and ethical dilemmas. People may live for extended periods with chronic painful or debilitating conditions that may be incurable.

AIM

This study attempts to study the attitudes of doctors toward euthanasia and the possible factors responsible for these attitudes.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey of 213 doctors working at a tertiary care hospital was conducted to determine their attitudes toward euthanasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire was used to assess attitudes and personal perceptions about euthanasia.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The Chi square test was used to assess factors influencing attitudes toward euthanasia.

RESULTS

A majority of the respondents (69.3%) supported the concept of euthanasia. Relief from unbearable pain and suffering was the most commonly (80.3%) cited reason for being willing to consider the option of euthanasia. Majority of those who were against euthanasia (66.2%) felt that the freedom to perform euthanasia could easily be misused. Disapproval of euthanasia was associated with religious affiliation (P<0.001) and speciality (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of the doctors in this study supported euthanasia for the relief of unbearable pain and suffering. Religion and speciality appear to be significant in determining attitudes toward euthanasia.

摘要

背景

专业知识和设备的进步使医学专业能够对生死过程施加更多控制,从而产生了一些道德和伦理困境。人们可能会长期患有慢性疼痛或使人衰弱的疾病,而这些疾病可能无法治愈。

目的

本研究旨在探讨医生对安乐死的态度以及导致这些态度的可能因素。

设置与设计

对一家三级护理医院的213名医生进行了横断面调查,以确定他们对安乐死的态度。

材料与方法

使用一份自填式问卷来评估对安乐死的态度和个人看法。

所用统计分析方法

采用卡方检验来评估影响对安乐死态度的因素。

结果

大多数受访者(69.3%)支持安乐死的概念。摆脱无法忍受的疼痛和痛苦是最常被提及(80.3%)的愿意考虑安乐死的原因。大多数反对安乐死的人(66.2%)认为实施安乐死的自由很容易被滥用。对安乐死的不认可与宗教信仰(P<0.001)和专业(P<0.001)有关。

结论

本研究中的大多数医生支持安乐死以缓解无法忍受的疼痛和痛苦。宗教信仰和专业在决定对安乐死的态度方面似乎具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Doctors in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India: A Cross Sectional study.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Sep;17(3):197-201. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.92336.
4
Attitudes and behaviors on physician-assisted death: a study of Michigan oncologists.
J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1055-61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1055.
5
The attitudes, role & knowledge of mental health nurses towards euthanasia because of unbearable mental suffering in Belgium: A pilot study.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Sep;25(7):400-410. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12475. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
[DOCTORS' ATTITUDES TOWARDS EUTHANASIA].
Harefuah. 2020 Jul;159(7):477-482.
7
Professed religious affiliation and the practice of euthanasia.
J Med Ethics. 1995 Feb;21(1):49-54. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.1.49.
9
Euthanasia: the perceptions of nurses in India.
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2013 Apr;19(4):187-93. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2013.19.4.187.

引用本文的文献

2
Attitude of the Lithuanian Public toward Medical Assistance in Dying: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 10;12(6):626. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060626.
3
Euthanasia - Review and update through the lens of a psychiatrist.
Ind Psychiatry J. 2023 Jan-Jun;32(1):15-18. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_259_21. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
Medical Faculty Students' Views on Euthanasia: Does It Change With Medical Education?
Alpha Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 18;22(2):113-117. doi: 10.5455/apd.126615. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Attitudes on euthanasia among medical students and doctors in Sri Lanka: a cross sectional study.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 7;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00731-2.
7
Right to Life or Right to Die in Advanced Dementia: Physician-Assisted Dying.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 21;11:622446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.622446. eCollection 2020.
8
Attitudes of Physicians towards Different Types of Euthanasia in Kuwait.
Med Princ Pract. 2019;28(3):199-207. doi: 10.1159/000497377. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
9
A systematic review of religious beliefs about major end-of-life issues in the five major world religions.
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Oct;15(5):609-622. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516001061.

本文引用的文献

4
Treatment decisions in advanced disease: a conceptual framework.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2009 Jan;15(1):30-6. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.53509.
5
Knowledge of the definition of euthanasia: study with doctors and caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009 May-Jun;55(3):263-7. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302009000300016.
6
Legalisation of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: survey of doctors' attitudes.
Palliat Med. 2009 Apr;23(3):205-12. doi: 10.1177/0269216308102041.
7
Survey of doctors' opinions of the legalization of physician assisted suicide.
BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Mar 5;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-2.
8
Impact of specialty on attitudes of Australian medical practitioners to end-of-life decisions.
Med J Aust. 2008 Apr 21;188(8):450-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01714.x.
9
End-of-life decisions in medical practice: a survey of doctors in Victoria (Australia).
J Med Ethics. 2007 Dec;33(12):721-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.017137.
10
Attitudes of oncologists toward euthanasia in Turkey.
Palliat Support Care. 2005 Sep;3(3):221-5. doi: 10.1017/s1478951505050340.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验