Suppr超能文献

骨提取方案的实证评估。

Empirical evaluation of bone extraction protocols.

机构信息

Department of Marine, Earth, Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031443. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

Abstract

The application of high-resolution analytical techniques to characterize ancient bone proteins requires clean, efficient extraction to obtain high quality data. Here, we evaluated many different protocols from the literature on ostrich cortical bone and moa cortical bone to evaluate their yield and relative purity using the identification of antibody-antigen complexes on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gel electrophoresis. Moa bone provided an ancient comparison for the effectiveness of bone extraction protocols tested on ostrich bone. For the immunological part of this study, we focused on collagen I, osteocalcin, and hemoglobin because collagen and osteocalcin are the most abundant proteins in the mineralized extracellular matrix and hemoglobin is common in the vasculature. Most of these procedures demineralize the bone first, and then the remaining organics are chemically extracted. We found that the use of hydrochloric acid, rather than ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, for demineralization resulted in the cleanest extractions because the acid was easily removed. In contrast, the use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid resulted in smearing upon electrophoretic separation, possibly indicating these samples were not as pure. The denaturing agents sodium dodecyl sulfate, urea, and guanidine HCl have been used extensively for the solubilization of proteins in non-biomineralized tissue, but only the latter has been used on bone. We show that all three denaturing agents are effective for extracting bone proteins. One additional method tested uses ammonium bicarbonate as a solubilizing buffer that is more appropriate for post-extraction analyses (e.g., proteomics) by removing the need for desalting. We found that both guanidine HCl and ammonium bicarbonate were effective for extracting many bone proteins, resulting in similar electrophoretic patterns. With the increasing use of proteomics, a new generation of scientists are now interested in the study of proteins from not only extant bone but also from ancient bone.

摘要

为了对古代骨骼蛋白进行高分辨率分析,需要进行高效、清洁的提取,以获取高质量的数据。为此,我们评估了文献中针对鸵鸟皮质骨和恐鸟皮质骨的多种不同提取方案,通过酶联免疫吸附测定和凝胶电泳鉴定抗体-抗原复合物,评估了这些方案的产率和相对纯度。恐鸟骨为我们提供了一个与鸵鸟骨相比的古代样本,用于评估测试的骨骼提取方案的有效性。在这项研究的免疫学部分,我们主要关注胶原蛋白 I、骨钙素和血红蛋白,因为胶原蛋白和骨钙素是矿化细胞外基质中最丰富的蛋白质,而血红蛋白则常见于血管中。这些方法大多首先对骨骼进行脱矿处理,然后用化学方法提取剩余的有机物。我们发现,使用盐酸而非乙二胺四乙酸进行脱矿处理可得到最清洁的提取液,因为盐酸易于去除。相比之下,使用乙二胺四乙酸进行脱矿处理会在电泳分离时出现弥散现象,这可能表明这些样本不够纯净。十二烷基硫酸钠、尿素和盐酸胍等变性剂广泛用于溶解非生物矿化组织中的蛋白质,但仅在骨骼中使用过后者。我们证明,所有三种变性剂都可有效提取骨骼蛋白。我们还测试了一种额外的方法,该方法使用碳酸氢铵作为溶解缓冲液,由于无需脱盐,因此更适合提取后的分析(例如蛋白质组学分析)。我们发现盐酸胍和碳酸氢铵均能有效提取多种骨骼蛋白,产生相似的电泳图谱。随着蛋白质组学的广泛应用,新一代科学家现在对不仅是现存骨骼,还有古代骨骼中的蛋白质的研究产生了兴趣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498f/3279360/d45e90556bce/pone.0031443.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验