Yousuf Rabeya, Abdul Aziz Suria, Yusof Nurasyikin, Leong Chooi-Fun
Blood Bank Unit, Department of Pathology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaakob Latif, Cheras, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Med Case Rep. 2012 Feb 20;6:71. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-6-71.
Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn is most commonly caused by anti-D alloantibody. It is usually seen in Rhesus D (RhD)-negative mothers that have been previously sensitized. We report here a case of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in a newborn baby caused by anti-D and anti-S alloantibodies, born to a mother who was RhD negative, but with no previous serological evidence of RhD alloimmunization.
A one-day-old Chinese baby boy was born to a mother who was group A RhD negative. The baby was jaundiced with hyperbilirubinemia, but with no evidence of infection. His blood group was group A RhD positive, his direct Coombs' test result was positive and red cell elution studies demonstrated the presence of anti-D and anti-S alloantibodies. Investigations performed on the maternal blood during the 22 weeks of gestation showed the presence of anti-S antibodies only. Repeat investigations performed post-natally showed the presence of similar antibodies as in the newborn and an anti-D titer of 1:32 (0.25 IU/mL), which was significant. A diagnosis of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn secondary to anti-D and anti-S was made. The baby was treated with phototherapy and close monitoring. He was discharged well after five days of phototherapy.
This case illustrates the possibility of an anamnestic response of allo-anti-D from previous sensitization in a RhD-negative mother, or the development of anti-D in mid-trimester. Thus, it highlights the importance of thorough antenatal ABO, RhD blood grouping and antibody screening, and if necessary, antibody identification and regular monitoring of antibody screening and antibody levels for prevention or early detection of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn, especially in cases of mothers with clinically significant red cell alloantibody.
胎儿及新生儿溶血病最常见的病因是抗-D同种抗体。通常见于既往已致敏的恒河猴D(RhD)阴性母亲。我们在此报告一例由抗-D和抗-S同种抗体引起的胎儿及新生儿溶血病病例,患儿母亲为RhD阴性,但既往无RhD同种免疫的血清学证据。
一名1日龄中国男婴,其母亲为A血型RhD阴性。婴儿出现黄疸伴高胆红素血症,但无感染迹象。其血型为A血型RhD阳性,直接抗人球蛋白试验结果为阳性,红细胞洗脱研究显示存在抗-D和抗-S同种抗体。妊娠22周时对母亲血液进行的检查仅显示存在抗-S抗体。产后复查显示存在与新生儿相似的抗体,抗-D效价为1:32(0.25 IU/mL),具有显著意义。诊断为抗-D和抗-S所致的胎儿及新生儿溶血病。婴儿接受了光疗并密切监测。光疗5天后顺利出院。
该病例说明了RhD阴性母亲既往致敏后同种抗-D发生回忆反应的可能性,或孕中期抗-D的产生。因此,它突出了产前进行全面的ABO、RhD血型鉴定和抗体筛查的重要性,必要时进行抗体鉴定以及定期监测抗体筛查和抗体水平,以预防或早期发现胎儿及新生儿溶血病,尤其是对于具有临床意义的红细胞同种抗体的母亲。