Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Mar 7;57(5):1399-412. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/5/1399. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
The aim of this study was to develop a model exploiting artificial neural networks (ANNs) to correlate dosimetric and clinical variables with late rectal bleeding in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy and to compare the ANN results with those of a standard logistic regression (LR) analysis. 718 men included in the AIROPROS 0102 trial were analyzed. This multicenter protocol was characterized by the prospective evaluation of rectal toxicity, with a minimum follow-up of 36 months. Radiotherapy doses were between 70 and 80 Gy. Information was recorded for comorbidity, previous abdominal surgery, use of drugs and hormonal therapy. For each patient, a rectal dose-volume histogram (DVH) of the whole treatment was recorded and the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) evaluated as an effective descriptor of the whole DVH. Late rectal bleeding of grade ≥ 2 was considered to define positive events in this study (52 of 718 patients). The overall population was split into training and verification sets, both of which were involved in model instruction, and a test set, used to evaluate the predictive power of the model with independent data. Fourfold cross-validation was also used to provide realistic results for the full dataset. The LR was performed on the same data. Five variables were selected to predict late rectal bleeding: EUD, abdominal surgery, presence of hemorrhoids, use of anticoagulants and androgen deprivation. Following a receiver operating characteristic analysis of the independent test set, the areas under the curves (AUCs) were 0.704 and 0.655 for ANN and LR, respectively. When evaluated with cross-validation, the AUC was 0.714 for ANN and 0.636 for LR, which differed at a significance level of p = 0.03. When a practical discrimination threshold was selected, ANN could classify data with sensitivity and specificity both equal to 68.0%, whereas these values were 61.5% for LR. These data provide reasonable evidence that results obtained with ANNs are superior to those achieved with LR when predicting late radiotherapy-related rectal bleeding. The future introduction of patient-related personal characteristics, such as gene expression profiles, might improve the predictive power of statistical classifiers. More refined morphological aspects of the dose distribution, such as dose surface mapping, might also enhance the overall performance of ANN-based predictive models.
本研究旨在开发一种利用人工神经网络(ANNs)的模型,将剂量学和临床变量与接受根治性放疗的前列腺癌患者的晚期直肠出血相关联,并将 ANN 结果与标准逻辑回归(LR)分析进行比较。分析了 AIROPROS 0102 试验中纳入的 718 名男性患者。该多中心方案的特点是前瞻性评估直肠毒性,随访时间至少为 36 个月。放疗剂量为 70-80Gy。记录了合并症、既往腹部手术、药物和激素治疗的信息。为每位患者记录了整个治疗过程的直肠剂量-体积直方图(DVH),并评估等效均匀剂量(EUD)作为整个 DVH 的有效描述符。本研究将 2 级以上的晚期直肠出血定义为阳性事件(718 例患者中有 52 例)。整个人群被分为训练集和验证集,这两个集合都用于模型指导,还有一个测试集,用于使用独立数据评估模型的预测能力。四折交叉验证也用于为整个数据集提供现实的结果。在相同的数据上进行了 LR。选择了五个变量来预测晚期直肠出血:EUD、腹部手术、痔疮的存在、使用抗凝剂和雄激素剥夺。对独立测试集进行受试者工作特征分析后,ANN 和 LR 的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.704 和 0.655。当使用交叉验证进行评估时,ANN 的 AUC 为 0.714,LR 的 AUC 为 0.636,差异具有统计学意义(p=0.03)。当选择实用的区分阈值时,ANN 可以将数据分类为敏感性和特异性均为 68.0%,而 LR 则为 61.5%。这些数据提供了合理的证据,表明在预测晚期放疗相关直肠出血时,ANN 获得的结果优于 LR。未来引入与患者相关的个人特征,如基因表达谱,可能会提高统计分类器的预测能力。更精细的剂量分布形态方面,如剂量表面映射,也可能增强基于 ANN 的预测模型的整体性能。