• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于颅咽管瘤,保守性切除术加辅助放疗更具优势。

The superiority of conservative resection and adjuvant radiation for craniopharyngiomas.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA 94143-1708, USA.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2012 May;108(1):133-9. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-0806-7. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11060-012-0806-7
PMID:22350375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3879154/
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the roles of resection extent and adjuvant radiation in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. We reviewed the records of 122 patients ages 11-52 years who received primary treatment for craniopharyngioma between 1980 and 2009 at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were development of panhypopituitarism, diabetes insipidus (DI), and visual field defects. Of 122 patients, 30 (24%) were treated with gross total resection (GTR) without radiation therapy (RT), 3 (3%) with GTR + RT, 41 (33.6%) with subtotal resection (STR) without RT, and 48 (39.3%) with STR + RT. Median age at diagnosis was 30 years, with 46 patients 18 years or younger. Median follow-up for all patients was 56.4 months (interquartile range 18.9-144.2 months) and 47 months (interquartile range 12.3-121.8 months) for the 60 patients without progression. Fifty six patients progressed, 10 have died, 6 without progression. Median PFS was 61.1 months for all patients. PFS rate at 2 years was 61.5% (95% CI: 52.1-70.9). OS rate at 10 years was 91.1% (95% CI 84.3-97.9). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between patients treated with GTR vs. STR + XRT (PFS; p = 0.544, OS; p = 0.735), but STR alone resulted in significantly shortened PFS compared to STR + RT or GTR (p < 0.001 for both). STR was associated with significantly shortened OS compared to STR + RT (p = 0.050) and trended to shorter OS compared to GTR (p = 0.066). GTR was associated with significantly greater risk of developing DI (56.3 vs. 13.3% with STR + XRT, p < 0.001) and panhypopituitarism (54.8 vs. 26.7% with STR + XRT, p = 0.014). In conclusion, for patients with craniopharyngioma, STR + RT may provide superior clinical outcome, achieving better disease control than STR and limiting side effects associated with aggressive surgical resection.

摘要

本研究旨在评估颅咽管瘤切除术范围和辅助放疗的作用。我们回顾了 1980 年至 2009 年期间在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(UCSF)接受颅咽管瘤初次治疗的 122 名年龄在 11-52 岁的患者的记录。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。次要终点是全垂体功能减退、尿崩症(DI)和视野缺损的发展。122 名患者中,30 名(24%)接受了无放疗的大体全切除(GTR)治疗,3 名(3%)接受了 GTR+RT 治疗,41 名(33.6%)接受了无放疗的次全切除(STR)治疗,48 名(39.3%)接受了 STR+RT 治疗。诊断时的中位年龄为 30 岁,46 名患者年龄在 18 岁以下。所有患者的中位随访时间为 56.4 个月(四分位距 18.9-144.2 个月),60 名无进展患者的中位随访时间为 47 个月(四分位距 12.3-121.8 个月)。56 名患者进展,10 名死亡,6 名无进展。所有患者的中位 PFS 为 61.1 个月。2 年时 PFS 率为 61.5%(95%CI:52.1-70.9)。10 年 OS 率为 91.1%(95%CI 84.3-97.9)。GTR 与 STR+XRT 治疗的患者 PFS(p=0.544)和 OS(p=0.735)无显著差异,但与 STR+RT 或 GTR 相比,STR 单独治疗的 PFS 明显缩短(均 p<0.001)。STR 与 STR+RT 相比,OS 明显缩短(p=0.050),与 GTR 相比,OS 有缩短趋势(p=0.066)。GTR 与更严重的 DI(56.3%比 STR+XRT 组 13.3%,p<0.001)和全垂体功能减退(54.8%比 STR+XRT 组 26.7%,p=0.014)风险增加相关。总之,对于颅咽管瘤患者,STR+RT 可能提供更好的临床结果,比 STR 更好地控制疾病,同时限制与积极手术切除相关的副作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852b/3879154/5023c589e407/nihms507171f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852b/3879154/b865391e6aa9/nihms507171f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852b/3879154/5023c589e407/nihms507171f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852b/3879154/b865391e6aa9/nihms507171f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/852b/3879154/5023c589e407/nihms507171f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The superiority of conservative resection and adjuvant radiation for craniopharyngiomas.对于颅咽管瘤,保守性切除术加辅助放疗更具优势。
J Neurooncol. 2012 May;108(1):133-9. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-0806-7. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
2
A systematic review of the results of surgery and radiotherapy on tumor control for pediatric craniopharyngioma.关于手术和放疗对儿童颅咽管瘤肿瘤控制效果的系统评价。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2013 Feb;29(2):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-1926-2. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
3
Long-term outcomes and complications in patients with craniopharyngioma: the British Columbia Cancer Agency experience.颅咽管瘤患者的长期疗效和并发症:不列颠哥伦比亚癌症署的经验。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Apr 1;88(5):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.019.
4
Long-Term Outcomes of Surgery and Radiation Treatment for Adult Patients with Craniopharyngioma.成人颅咽管瘤手术和放疗的长期疗效。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;187:e852-e859. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.177. Epub 2024 May 7.
5
Patterns of Care in Pediatric Craniopharyngioma: Outcomes Following Definitive Radiotherapy.儿童颅咽管瘤的治疗模式:根治性放疗后的结果
Anticancer Res. 2019 Feb;39(2):803-807. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13178.
6
Craniopharyngioma: a comparison of tumor control with various treatment strategies.颅咽管瘤:不同治疗策略的肿瘤控制比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Apr;28(4):E5. doi: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09307.
7
Impact of maximal safe resection on the clinical outcome of adults with craniopharyngiomas.最大限度安全切除对成人颅咽管瘤临床结局的影响。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jul;19(7):1005-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.09.033. Epub 2012 May 16.
8
Endonasal endoscopic reoperation for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas.经鼻内镜再次手术治疗颅咽管瘤残留或复发。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;126(2):418-430. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152238. Epub 2016 May 6.
9
Is Postoperative Radiotherapy Needed in the Management of Adult Craniopharyngiomas?成人颅咽管瘤的治疗中是否需要术后放疗?
Can J Neurol Sci. 2023 May;50(3):428-434. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2022.28. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
The implication of giant tumor size on surgical resection, oncological, and functional outcomes in craniopharyngioma.巨大肿瘤大小对颅咽管瘤手术切除、肿瘤学和功能结局的影响。
Pituitary. 2020 Oct;23(5):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s11102-020-01053-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Limitations of MRI in differentiating solid and cystic components of craniopharyngiomas.磁共振成像在区分颅咽管瘤实性和囊性成分方面的局限性。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2025 Sep 16;41(1):281. doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06941-y.
2
A case-based review of adult-onset craniopharyngioma.成人起病颅咽管瘤的病例回顾
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 15;16:1527161. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1527161. eCollection 2025.
3
Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Residual and Recurrent Craniopharyngioma after Transcranial Approach: A Multi-institutional Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Craniopharyngioma: a comparison of tumor control with various treatment strategies.颅咽管瘤:不同治疗策略的肿瘤控制比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Apr;28(4):E5. doi: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09307.
2
Radiation therapy for pediatric craniopharyngioma.儿童颅咽管瘤的放射治疗。
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Apr;28(4):E10. doi: 10.3171/2010.1.FOCUS09297.
3
The role of fractionated radiotherapy and radiosurgery in the management of patients with craniopharyngioma.分次放射治疗和立体定向放射外科在颅咽管瘤患者管理中的作用。
经鼻内镜入路治疗经颅手术后残留及复发性颅咽管瘤:多机构经验
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024 May 3;86(3):295-302. doi: 10.1055/a-2301-3867. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Tumor features in adult papillary and adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma: neuroradiological evaluation of pituitary-hypothalamic-axis dysfunction and outcome prediction.成人乳头型和造釉细胞瘤型颅咽管瘤的肿瘤特征:垂体-下丘脑轴功能障碍的神经放射学评估及预后预测
Neuroradiology. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03615-z.
5
Craniopharyngiomas in children: the pendulum moves again for an aggressive surgery-late complications and considerations with a recent series of 26 patients treated in Lyon.儿童颅咽管瘤:激进手术的趋势再次转变——近期里昂治疗的26例患者的晚期并发症及考量
Childs Nerv Syst. 2025 Apr 26;41(1):169. doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06815-3.
6
The spectrum of radiation therapy options for craniopharyngioma: a systematic review.颅咽管瘤放射治疗选择的范围:一项系统评价
J Neurooncol. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05001-4.
7
Current clinical trials for craniopharyngiomas: what's on the horizon?颅咽管瘤的当前临床试验:未来前景如何?
J Neurooncol. 2025 Apr;172(2):281-288. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04899-6. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
8
Papillary craniopharyngioma management in the era of BRAF and MEK inhibition.BRAF和MEK抑制时代的乳头状颅咽管瘤治疗
J Neurooncol. 2025 May;173(1):225-232. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-04969-3. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
9
Targeted treatment for craniopharyngioma.颅咽管瘤的靶向治疗
J Neurooncol. 2025 May;172(3):503-513. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-04942-0. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
10
Radiation therapy for childhood-onset craniopharyngioma: systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童期颅咽管瘤的放射治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Neurooncol. 2025 Mar;172(1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04914-w. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Neurosurg Rev. 2009 Apr;32(2):125-32; discussion 132. doi: 10.1007/s10143-009-0186-4. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
4
Vascular abnormalities in pediatric craniopharyngioma patients treated with radiation therapy.接受放射治疗的儿童颅咽管瘤患者的血管异常情况。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Feb;52(2):227-30. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21787.
5
Long-term outcome in children treated for craniopharyngioma with and without radiotherapy.接受和未接受放射治疗的颅咽管瘤患儿的长期预后。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008 Feb;1(2):126-30. doi: 10.3171/PED/2008/1/2/126.
6
Craniopharyngiomas.颅咽管瘤
Endocr Rev. 2006 Jun;27(4):371-97. doi: 10.1210/er.2006-0002. Epub 2006 Mar 16.
7
Phase II trial of conformal radiation therapy for pediatric patients with craniopharyngioma and correlation of surgical factors and radiation dosimetry with change in cognitive function.颅咽管瘤患儿适形放射治疗的II期试验以及手术因素和放射剂量测定与认知功能变化的相关性
J Neurosurg. 2006 Feb;104(2 Suppl):94-102. doi: 10.3171/ped.2006.104.2.5.
8
Craniopharyngiomas in children and adults: systematic analysis of 121 cases with long-term follow-up.儿童和成人颅咽管瘤:121例长期随访的系统分析
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005 Apr;62(4):397-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02231.x.
9
Surgery with or without radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngiomas in children and young adults.手术联合或不联合放射治疗用于儿童和青年颅咽管瘤的治疗。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 1;58(3):714-20. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01570-0.
10
Craniopharyngioma: the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital experience 1984-2001.颅咽管瘤:圣裘德儿童研究医院1984 - 2001年的经验
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jul 1;53(3):533-42. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02799-2.