Suppr超能文献

自付额变化是否降低了儿童健康保险计划参保者的医疗服务利用率?来自阿拉巴马州的证据。

Did copayment changes reduce health service utilization among CHIP enrollees? Evidence from Alabama.

机构信息

Lister Hill Center for Health Policy, and Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug;47(4):1603-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether health care utilization changed among enrollees in Alabama's CHIP program, ALL Kids, following copayment increases at the beginning of fiscal year 2004.

DATA SOURCES

Data on all ALL Kids enrollees over 1999-2009 are obtained from claims files and the state's administrative database.

STUDY DESIGN

We use pooled month-level data for all enrollees and conduct covariate-adjusted segmented regression models. Health services considered are inpatient care, emergency department (ED) visits, brand-name prescription drugs, generic prescription drugs, physician office visits and outpatient-services, ambulance services, allergy treatments, and non-preventive dental services. Physician well-visits, preventive dental services, and service use by Native-Americans--which saw no copayment increases--serve as counterfactuals.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

There are significant declines in utilization for inpatient care, physician visits, brand-name medications, and ED visits following the copayment increases. By and large, utilization did not decline, or declined only temporarily, for those services and for those enrollees that who not subject to increased copayments.

CONCLUSIONS

Copayment increases reduced utilization of many health services among ALL Kids enrollees. Concerns remain regarding the long-term health consequences to low-income children of copayment-induced reductions in health care utilization.

摘要

目的

探讨阿拉巴马州儿童健康保险计划(ALL Kids)中的参保人在 2004 财年初增加共付额后,其医疗保健利用是否发生变化。

资料来源

通过索赔档案和州行政数据库获得了 ALL Kids 所有参保人在 1999 年至 2009 年期间的数据。

研究设计

我们使用所有参保人每月的汇总数据,并进行协变量调整的分段回归模型分析。所考虑的卫生服务包括住院治疗、急诊部(ED)就诊、名牌处方药、仿制药、医生门诊和门诊服务、救护车服务、过敏治疗和非预防性牙科服务。医生常规就诊、预防性牙科服务以及未增加共付额的美国原住民的服务使用情况作为反事实依据。

主要发现

在共付额增加后,住院治疗、医生就诊、名牌药物和 ED 就诊的利用率显著下降。在很大程度上,对于那些不受增加共付额影响的服务和参保人来说,利用率并没有下降,或者只是暂时下降。

结论

共付额的增加减少了 ALL Kids 参保人的许多卫生服务的利用。对于低收入儿童因共付额减少而导致的医疗保健利用减少对其长期健康后果仍存在担忧。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Factors That Drive Nonurgent Emergency Department Use.探索促使非紧急情况患者前往急诊科就诊的因素。
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jul 23;12:23743735251362529. doi: 10.1177/23743735251362529. eCollection 2025.
4
COVID-19: Recovery Models for Radiology Departments.COVID-19:放射科的恢复模式。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov;17(11):1460-1468. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
7
The impact of prescription drug co-payments for publicly insured families.参保家庭处方药共付额的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):261-274. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01125-3. Epub 2019 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验