Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Resuscitation. 2012 Jul;83(7):862-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
Resuscitation centers may improve patient outcomes by achieving sufficient experience in post-resuscitation care. We analyzed the relationship between survival and hospital volume among patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
This prospective cohort investigation collected data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival database from 10/1/05 to 12/31/09. Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Hospital characteristics were obtained via 2005 American Hospital Association Survey. A hospital's use of hypothermia was obtained via direct survey. To adjust for hospital- and patient-level variation, multilevel, hierarchical logistic regression was performed. Hospital volume was modeled as a categorical (OHCA/year≤10, 11-39, ≥40) variable. A stratified analysis evaluating those with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) was also performed.
The cohort included 4125 patients transported by EMS to 155 hospitals in 16 states. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 35% among those admitted to the hospital. Individual hospital rates of survival varied widely (0-100%). Unadjusted survival did not differ between the 3 hospital groups (36% for ≤10 OHCA/year, 35% for 11-39, and 36% for ≥40; p=0.75). After multilevel adjustment, differences in survival across the groups were not statistically significant. Compared to patients at hospitals with ≤10 OHCA/year, adjusted OR for survival was 1.04 (CI(95) 0.83-1.28) among 11-39 annual volume and 0.97 (CI(95) 0.73-1.30) among the ≥40 volume hospitals. Among patients presenting with VF/VT, no difference in survival was identified between the hospital groups.
Survival varied substantially across hospitals. However, hospital OHCA volume was not associated with likelihood of survival. Additional efforts are required to determine what hospital characteristics might account for the variability observed in OHCA hospital outcomes.
复苏中心通过在复苏后护理方面积累足够的经验,可能改善患者的预后。我们分析了院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的生存与医院容量之间的关系。
本前瞻性队列研究于 2005 年 10 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日从心脏骤停注册研究数据库中收集数据。主要结果是出院时的生存。通过 2005 年美国医院协会调查获取医院特征。通过直接调查获取医院使用低温疗法的情况。为了调整医院和患者水平的变化,进行了多层次、分层逻辑回归。将医院容量建模为分类变量(OHCA/年≤10、11-39、≥40)。还进行了分层分析,评估那些有心室颤动或无脉性室性心动过速(VF/VT)的患者。
该队列包括 4125 名由急救医疗服务机构转运至 16 个州的 155 家医院的患者。住院患者的总体出院生存率为 35%。个别医院的生存率差异很大(0-100%)。未经调整的生存率在 3 个医院组之间没有差异(OHCA/年≤10 组为 36%,11-39 组为 35%,≥40 组为 36%;p=0.75)。经过多层次调整后,各组之间的生存率差异无统计学意义。与 OHCA/年≤10 的医院相比,11-39 年和≥40 年容量医院的生存率调整后 OR 分别为 1.04(95%CI(95)0.83-1.28)和 0.97(95%CI(95)0.73-1.30)。在 VF/VT 患者中,不同医院组之间的生存率无差异。
医院之间的生存率差异很大。然而,医院 OHCA 容量与生存率无关。需要进一步努力确定哪些医院特征可能解释 OHCA 医院结局的可变性。