Ford A H, Clark T, Reynolds E C, Ross C, Shelley K, Simmonds L, Benger J, Soar J, Nolan J P, Thomas M
Department of Anaesthetics, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, UK.
Peninsula Deanery, Peninsula Postgraduate Medical Education, Plymouth, UK.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 May;17(2):117-121. doi: 10.1177/1751143715615151. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
Cardiac arrest is a common presentation to intensive care units. There is evidence that management protocols between hospitals differ and that this variation is mirrored in patient outcomes between institutions, with standardised treatment protocols improving outcomes within individual units. It has been postulated that regionalisation of services may improve outcomes as has been shown in trauma, burns and stroke patients, however a national protocol has not been a focus for research. The objective of our study was to ascertain current management strategies for comatose post cardiac arrest survivors in intensive care in the United Kingdom.
A telephone survey was carried out to establish the management of comatose post cardiac arrest survivors in UK intensive care units. All 235 UK intensive care units were contacted and 208 responses (89%) were received.
A treatment protocol is used in 172 units (82.7%). Emergency cardiology services were available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in 54 (26%) hospitals; most units (123, 55.8%) transfer patients out for urgent coronary angiography. A ventilator care bundle is used in 197 units (94.7%) and 189 units (90.9%) have a policy for temperature management. Target temperature, duration and method of temperature control and rate of rewarming differ between units. Access to neurophysiology investigations was poor with 91 units (43.8%) reporting no availability.
Our results show that treatments available vary considerably between different UK institutions with only 28 units (13.5%) able to offer all aspects of care. This suggests the need for 'cardiac arrest care bundles' and regional centres to ensure cardiac arrests survivors have access to appropriate care.
心脏骤停是重症监护病房常见的病症。有证据表明,不同医院之间的管理方案存在差异,这种差异也反映在不同机构的患者治疗结果上,标准化治疗方案可改善各单位内的治疗结果。据推测,服务区域化可能会改善治疗结果,就像在创伤、烧伤和中风患者中所显示的那样,然而国家方案尚未成为研究重点。我们研究的目的是确定英国重症监护中昏迷的心脏骤停幸存者的当前管理策略。
进行了一项电话调查,以确定英国重症监护病房中昏迷的心脏骤停幸存者的管理情况。联系了英国所有235个重症监护病房,收到208份回复(89%)。
172个单位(82.7%)使用了治疗方案。54家(26%)医院提供每周7天、每天24小时的紧急心脏病学服务;大多数单位(123个,55.8%)将患者转出进行紧急冠状动脉造影。197个单位(94.7%)使用了呼吸机护理包,189个单位(90.9%)有温度管理政策。各单位之间目标温度、持续时间、温度控制方法和复温速率有所不同。神经生理学检查的可及性较差,91个单位(43.8%)报告无法进行该项检查。
我们的结果表明,英国不同机构之间可用的治疗方法差异很大,只有28个单位(13.5%)能够提供所有方面的护理。这表明需要“心脏骤停护理包”和区域中心,以确保心脏骤停幸存者能够获得适当的护理。