Department of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Jun;67(6):1486-92. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks043. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
We performed a prospective observational study comparing the efficacy and safety of low-dose ganciclovir (5 mg/kg/day) as initial preemptive therapy in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients with conventional-dose ganciclovir (10 mg/kg/day).
All adult patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT were enrolled at a transplant centre over a 24 month period. The decision to use low-dose or conventional-dose ganciclovir was at the discretion of each attending haematologist. A logistic regression model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity scores was performed to reduce the effect of the selection bias in assignment for ganciclovir preemptive therapy.
Of the 252 HSCT recipients, 97 (38%) received preemptive ganciclovir therapy. Of these, 53 (55%) and 44 (45%) received low-dose and conventional-dose ganciclovir, respectively. The viral clearance rate was higher in the low-dose ganciclovir group [98% (52/53)] than in the conventional-dose ganciclovir group [86% (38/44), P = 0.04], while the low-dose ganciclovir group exhibited a longer viral clearance time (median 21.0 days) than the conventional-dose ganciclovir group (median 14.0 days, P = 0.05). The rate of discontinuation of therapy due to neutropenia or nephrotoxicity was similar in the two groups, although conventional-dose ganciclovir was changed to another regimen more frequently than low-dose ganciclovir. There were three cases of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in each group after the initial preemptive therapy. The logistic regression models using propensity scores also revealed that there were no significant differences in viral clearance, secondary episodes of CMV infection, CMV disease and overall mortality between the two groups.
Low-dose ganciclovir appears to be safe, and to be at least as effective as conventional-dose ganciclovir for CMV viraemia in allogeneic HSCT recipients.
我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,比较了低剂量更昔洛韦(5mg/kg/天)与常规剂量更昔洛韦(10mg/kg/天)作为异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)受者初始预防性治疗的疗效和安全性。
在 24 个月的时间内,在一个移植中心纳入所有接受异基因 HSCT 的成年患者。使用低剂量或常规剂量更昔洛韦的决定由每位主治血液病学家决定。使用倾向评分进行逆概率处理加权(IPTW)的逻辑回归模型,以减少分配更昔洛韦预防性治疗时选择偏差的影响。
在 252 例 HSCT 受者中,97 例(38%)接受了预防性更昔洛韦治疗。其中,53 例(55%)和 44 例(45%)分别接受了低剂量和常规剂量更昔洛韦。低剂量更昔洛韦组的病毒清除率更高[98%(52/53)],高于常规剂量更昔洛韦组[86%(38/44),P=0.04],而低剂量更昔洛韦组的病毒清除时间更长(中位数 21.0 天),高于常规剂量更昔洛韦组(中位数 14.0 天,P=0.05)。由于中性粒细胞减少或肾毒性而停止治疗的发生率在两组之间相似,尽管常规剂量更昔洛韦比低剂量更昔洛韦更频繁地更改为另一种方案。初始预防性治疗后,两组各有 3 例巨细胞病毒(CMV)病。使用倾向评分的逻辑回归模型也表明,两组之间病毒清除、CMV 感染的二次发作、CMV 病和总死亡率均无显著差异。
低剂量更昔洛韦似乎是安全的,并且与异基因 HSCT 受者的 CMV 血症相比,至少与常规剂量更昔洛韦一样有效。