Department of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Feb;57(2):983-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01961-12. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
Few antiviral agents are available for treating paramyxovirus infections, such as those involving respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza virus (PIV), and human metapneumovirus (hMPV). We evaluated the effect of oral ribavirin on clinical outcomes of paramyxovirus infections in patients with hematological diseases. All adult patients with paramyxovirus were retrospectively reviewed over a 2-year period. Patients who received oral ribavirin were compared to those who received supportive care without ribavirin therapy. A propensity-matched case-control study and a logistic regression model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to reduce the effect of selection bias in assignment for oral ribavirin therapy. A total of 145 patients, including 64 (44%) with PIV, 60 (41%) with RSV, and 21 (15%) with hMPV, were analyzed. Of these 145 patients, 114 (78%) received oral ribavirin and the remaining 31 (21%) constituted the nonribavirin group. Thirty-day mortality and underlying respiratory death rates were 31% (35/114) and 12% (14/114), respectively, for the oral ribavirin group versus 19% (6/31) and 16% (5/31), respectively, for the nonribavirin group (P = 0.21 and P = 0.56). In the case-control study, the 30-day mortality rate in the ribavirin group was 24% (5/21) versus 19% (4/21) in the nonribavirin group (P = 0.71). In addition, the logistic regression model with IPTW revealed no significant difference in 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio of 1.3; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] of 0.3 to 5.8) between the two groups. Steroid use (adjusted odds ratio, 5.67; P = 0.01) and upper respiratory tract infection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.07; P = 0.001) was independently associated with mortality. Our data suggest that oral ribavirin therapy may not improve clinical outcomes in hematologic disease patients infected with paramyxovirus.
目前用于治疗副黏病毒感染(如呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)、副流感病毒(PIV)和人偏肺病毒(hMPV))的抗病毒药物有限。我们评估了口服利巴韦林对血液病患者副黏病毒感染临床结局的影响。回顾性分析了 2 年内所有副黏病毒感染的成年患者。将接受口服利巴韦林治疗的患者与未接受利巴韦林治疗的支持治疗患者进行比较。采用倾向评分匹配病例对照研究和逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)的逻辑回归模型,以减少口服利巴韦林治疗分配中的选择偏倚效应。共分析了 145 例患者,其中 64 例(44%)为 PIV、60 例(41%)为 RSV 和 21 例(15%)为 hMPV。在这 145 例患者中,114 例(78%)接受了口服利巴韦林治疗,其余 31 例(21%)为非利巴韦林组。口服利巴韦林组 30 天死亡率和基础呼吸道死亡率分别为 31%(35/114)和 12%(14/114),而非利巴韦林组分别为 19%(6/31)和 16%(5/31)(P=0.21 和 P=0.56)。在病例对照研究中,利巴韦林组 30 天死亡率为 24%(5/21),而非利巴韦林组为 19%(4/21)(P=0.71)。此外,采用 IPTW 的逻辑回归模型显示,两组 30 天死亡率无显著差异(调整后的危险比为 1.3;95%置信区间 [95%CI]为 0.3 至 5.8)。使用类固醇(调整后的优势比,5.67;P=0.01)和上呼吸道感染(调整后的优势比,0.07;P=0.001)与死亡率独立相关。我们的数据表明,口服利巴韦林治疗可能不会改善血液病患者感染副黏病毒的临床结局。