Mahajan A, Lin X, Nayar R
Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Cytopathology. 2013 Apr;24(2):85-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2012.00966.x. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
The Bethesda System of Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology classifies the indeterminate categories based on their differing risks of malignancy, as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FLUS) and suspicious for malignancy. The vast majority of cases of the last category are suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The aim of the present study was to identify the pitfalls and clues to improve the usage of the suspicious category as well as improve its outcome of malignancy.
We reviewed the cytological features on air dried Diff-Quik® and alcohol-fixed Papanicolaou smears from 54 thyroid fine needle aspirates (FNAs) with surgical follow-up that were originally diagnosed as suspicious. Procedure data/specimen adequacy was correlated and follow-up histology reports were reviewed after our cytological review was completed. Incidental PTC that was not the target of the FNA was excluded from the calculations for correlation.
In our cytological review, we retained a diagnosis of suspicious in 18 of the 54 cases and the remaining 36 were re-categorized as follows: 6 malignant, 10 neoplasm (which is used in our centre instead of FLUS) and 20 AUS. The reasons for overcall of suspicious cases included pseudopapillae, syncytial sheets, nuclear grooves and pinpoint nucleoli in chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and Hürthle cell neoplasms, and intranuclear inclusions in parathyroid adenoma, hyalinizing trabecular adenoma and mesenchymal repair. The primary reasons for undercall of PTC as suspicious included cystic aspirates with minor features of PTC such as histiocytoid cells, bubblegum colloid, syncytial sheets and cellular swirls. Cases with cytoplasm similar to Hürthle cells were also noted to cause difficulty in accurate classification.
Recognition of these pitfalls and clues can help improve diagnosis, patient treatment and consequently reduce the number of unnecessary thyroidectomies.
甲状腺细胞病理学报告的贝塞斯达系统根据其不同的恶性风险对不确定类别进行分类,即意义不明确的非典型性病变(AUS)、滤泡性肿瘤/可疑滤泡性肿瘤(FLUS)以及可疑恶性肿瘤。最后一类中的绝大多数病例为可疑甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)。本研究的目的是识别提高可疑类别的使用及改善其恶性结果的陷阱和线索。
我们回顾了54例甲状腺细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNA)的空气干燥Diff-Quik®涂片和酒精固定巴氏涂片的细胞学特征,这些病例均有手术随访结果,最初诊断为可疑。在完成细胞学检查后,将操作数据/标本充分性进行关联,并复查随访组织学报告。非FNA目标的偶然PTC被排除在相关性计算之外。
在我们的细胞学检查中,54例病例中有18例维持可疑诊断,其余36例重新分类如下:6例为恶性,10例为肿瘤(在我们中心使用该术语而非FLUS),20例为AUS。可疑病例过度诊断的原因包括慢性淋巴细胞性甲状腺炎和许特莱细胞肿瘤中的假乳头、合体细胞片、核沟和针尖样核仁,以及甲状旁腺腺瘤、透明变性小梁腺瘤和间叶修复中的核内包涵体。PTC被漏诊为可疑的主要原因包括具有PTC轻微特征的囊性抽吸物,如组织细胞样细胞、泡沫状胶质、合体细胞片和细胞漩涡。细胞质类似于许特莱细胞的病例也被指出在准确分类方面存在困难。
认识到这些陷阱和线索有助于改善诊断、患者治疗,从而减少不必要的甲状腺切除术数量。