Suppr超能文献

系统评价:用于胃肠道疾病的 5-HT(4)激动剂的心血管安全性概况。

Systematic review: cardiovascular safety profile of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Apr;35(7):745-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05011.x. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The nonselective 5-HT(4) receptor agonists, cisapride and tegaserod have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events (AEs).

AIM

To perform a systematic review of the safety profile, particularly cardiovascular, of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders, and a nonsystematic summary of their pharmacology and clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Articles reporting data on cisapride, clebopride, prucalopride, mosapride, renzapride, tegaserod, TD-5108 (velusetrag) and ATI-7505 (naronapride) were identified through a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Toxfile. Abstracts from UEGW 2006-2008 and DDW 2008-2010 were searched for these drug names, and pharmaceutical companies approached to provide unpublished data.

RESULTS

Retrieved articles on pharmacokinetics, human pharmacodynamics and clinical data with these 5-HT(4) agonists, are reviewed and summarised nonsystematically. Articles relating to cardiac safety and tolerability of these agents, including any relevant case reports, are reported systematically. Two nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists had reports of cardiovascular AEs: cisapride (QT prolongation) and tegaserod (ischaemia). Interactions with, respectively, the hERG cardiac potassium channel and 5-HT(1) receptor subtypes have been suggested to account for these effects. No cardiovascular safety concerns were reported for the newer, selective 5-HT(4) agonists prucalopride, velusetrag, naronapride, or for nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists with no hERG or 5-HT(1) affinity (renzapride, clebopride, mosapride).

CONCLUSIONS

5-HT(4) agonists for GI disorders differ in chemical structure and selectivity for 5-HT(4) receptors. Selectivity for 5-HT(4) over non-5-HT(4) receptors may influence the agent's safety and overall risk-benefit profile. Based on available evidence, highly selective 5-HT(4) agonists may offer improved safety to treat patients with impaired GI motility.

摘要

背景

非选择性 5-HT(4) 受体激动剂西沙必利和替加色罗与心血管不良事件(AE)有关。

目的

对开发用于胃肠道疾病的 5-HT(4) 激动剂的安全性概况进行系统评价,特别是心血管安全性,并对其药理学和临床疗效进行非系统总结。

方法

通过系统搜索 Cochrane 图书馆、Medline、Embase 和 Toxfile,确定了报道西沙必利、clebopride、普卡必利、莫沙必利、renzapride、替加色罗、TD-5108(velusetrag)和 ATI-7505(naronapride)数据的文章。搜索 2006-2008 年 UEGW 和 2008-2010 年 DDW 的摘要,以获取这些药物的名称,并联系制药公司提供未发表的数据。

结果

对这些 5-HT(4) 激动剂的药代动力学、人体药效学和临床数据的检索文章进行了非系统回顾和总结。系统报告了与这些药物的心脏安全性和耐受性相关的文章,包括任何相关的病例报告。两种非选择性 5-HT(4) 激动剂有心血管 AE 报告:西沙必利(QT 延长)和替加色罗(缺血)。分别与 hERG 心脏钾通道和 5-HT(1) 受体亚型的相互作用被认为是这些作用的原因。对于较新的、选择性 5-HT(4) 激动剂普卡必利、velusetrag、naronapride,或对于没有 hERG 或 5-HT(1) 亲和力的非选择性 5-HT(4) 激动剂(renzapride、clebopride、mosapride),没有报告心血管安全性问题。

结论

用于胃肠道疾病的 5-HT(4) 激动剂在化学结构和对 5-HT(4) 受体的选择性上有所不同。对 5-HT(4) 受体的选择性超过非 5-HT(4) 受体可能会影响药物的安全性和整体风险效益状况。根据现有证据,高度选择性 5-HT(4) 激动剂可能为治疗胃肠动力障碍患者提供更好的安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f61/3491670/6fbfe0c60c87/apt0035-0745-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验