Suppr超能文献

基于三维锥形束 CT 评估正常牙合人群与不对称患者的牙颌不对称:一个关于横断参考平面的研究。

Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.

机构信息

Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Medical College, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):860-7. doi: 10.2319/102911-668.1. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize symmetrical features of patients with facial asymmetry and thus to find the most reliable horizontal reference lines easily used in three-dimensional images. The hypothesis was that there is a difference in the location of bilateral landmarks of the upper skull between the normal occlusion sample and skeletal Class III patients with asymmetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Group 1 (normal occlusion sample) was composed of 20 Korean adults with normal occlusion and no noticeable asymmetry. Groups 2 through 4 were selected from patients who were diagnosed as skeletal Class III malocclusion and grouped according to the extent of asymmetry (group 2: symmetric mandible, no maxillary cant; group 3: asymmetric mandible, no maxillary cant; group 4: asymmetric mandible, more than 4 mm maxillary cant measured at maxillary first molars). Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography images were taken before treatment, and bilateral landmarks of the skull were located and their vertical and horizontal differences compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was noted in the position of bilateral landmarks between groups, except for AG (P < .05). AG showed significant differences in vertical dimension (P < .001) and in horizontal dimension (P < .0001) between groups. The mean of the difference was clearly greatest at FM.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesis is rejected. All groups had a similar pattern of asymmetry in the upper third of the face. Therefore, the transverse reference line of the bilateral Z or orbitale may be used even in patients with severe asymmetry of the maxilla with reference to the clinical photos.

摘要

目的

描述面部不对称患者的对称特征,从而找到最可靠的水平参考线,以便在三维图像中轻松使用。假设正常咬合样本和存在不对称的骨性 III 类错颌患者的上颅骨双侧标志点的位置存在差异。

材料与方法

第 1 组(正常咬合样本)由 20 名韩国正常咬合且无明显不对称的成年人组成。第 2 组至第 4 组从被诊断为骨性 III 类错颌的患者中选择,并根据不对称程度分组(第 2 组:对称下颌,上颌无倾斜;第 3 组:不对称下颌,上颌无倾斜;第 4 组:不对称下颌,上颌第一磨牙处测量的上颌倾斜超过 4mm)。在治疗前拍摄了三维锥形束 CT 图像,并定位了颅骨双侧标志点,并比较了它们的垂直和水平差异。

结果

除了 AG(P<0.05),各组双侧标志点的位置没有统计学差异。AG 在垂直方向(P<0.001)和水平方向(P<0.0001)上均存在显著差异。FM 处的差异平均值最大。

结论

该假设被拒绝。所有组的面部上三分之一都存在相似的不对称模式。因此,即使对上颌严重不对称的患者,也可以参考临床照片,使用双侧 Z 或眶点的横向参考线。

相似文献

3
Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul;144(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.026.
4
Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.027.
5
Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.135. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
8
Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.038.
9
Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
Int Orthod. 2014 Mar;12(1):32-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Does maxillary yaw exist in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Oct;160(4):573-587. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.05.025. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Facial asymmetry of the hard and soft tissues in skeletal Class I, II, and III patients.
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 29;14(1):4966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55107-4.
3
Three-dimensional facial hard tissue symmetry in a healthy Caucasian population group: a systematic review.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6081-6092. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04126-w. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
5
Quantification of three-dimensional facial asymmetry for diagnosis and postoperative evaluation of orthognathic surgery.
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May 25;42(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00260-9. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Comparison of three midsagittal planes for three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography head reorientation.
Korean J Orthod. 2020 Jan;50(1):3-12. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.3. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Sep 5;24(4):54-62. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.054-062.oar.
10
Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry: A systematic review.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S433-7. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163491.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined 3-dimensional and mirror-image analysis for the diagnosis of asymmetry.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):886-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.03.032.
3
6
Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):402-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
7
Pitch, roll, and yaw: describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.032.
8
3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Sep;102(3):382-90. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.057. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
9
3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Feb;99(2):212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.072.
10
Assessment of facial asymmetries from posteroanterior cephalograms: validity of reference lines.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 May;123(5):512-20. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.S0889540602570347.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验