• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于三维锥形束 CT 评估正常牙合人群与不对称患者的牙颌不对称:一个关于横断参考平面的研究。

Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.

机构信息

Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Medical College, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):860-7. doi: 10.2319/102911-668.1. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

DOI:10.2319/102911-668.1
PMID:22356706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8823123/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize symmetrical features of patients with facial asymmetry and thus to find the most reliable horizontal reference lines easily used in three-dimensional images. The hypothesis was that there is a difference in the location of bilateral landmarks of the upper skull between the normal occlusion sample and skeletal Class III patients with asymmetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Group 1 (normal occlusion sample) was composed of 20 Korean adults with normal occlusion and no noticeable asymmetry. Groups 2 through 4 were selected from patients who were diagnosed as skeletal Class III malocclusion and grouped according to the extent of asymmetry (group 2: symmetric mandible, no maxillary cant; group 3: asymmetric mandible, no maxillary cant; group 4: asymmetric mandible, more than 4 mm maxillary cant measured at maxillary first molars). Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography images were taken before treatment, and bilateral landmarks of the skull were located and their vertical and horizontal differences compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was noted in the position of bilateral landmarks between groups, except for AG (P < .05). AG showed significant differences in vertical dimension (P < .001) and in horizontal dimension (P < .0001) between groups. The mean of the difference was clearly greatest at FM.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesis is rejected. All groups had a similar pattern of asymmetry in the upper third of the face. Therefore, the transverse reference line of the bilateral Z or orbitale may be used even in patients with severe asymmetry of the maxilla with reference to the clinical photos.

摘要

目的

描述面部不对称患者的对称特征,从而找到最可靠的水平参考线,以便在三维图像中轻松使用。假设正常咬合样本和存在不对称的骨性 III 类错颌患者的上颅骨双侧标志点的位置存在差异。

材料与方法

第 1 组(正常咬合样本)由 20 名韩国正常咬合且无明显不对称的成年人组成。第 2 组至第 4 组从被诊断为骨性 III 类错颌的患者中选择,并根据不对称程度分组(第 2 组:对称下颌,上颌无倾斜;第 3 组:不对称下颌,上颌无倾斜;第 4 组:不对称下颌,上颌第一磨牙处测量的上颌倾斜超过 4mm)。在治疗前拍摄了三维锥形束 CT 图像,并定位了颅骨双侧标志点,并比较了它们的垂直和水平差异。

结果

除了 AG(P<0.05),各组双侧标志点的位置没有统计学差异。AG 在垂直方向(P<0.001)和水平方向(P<0.0001)上均存在显著差异。FM 处的差异平均值最大。

结论

该假设被拒绝。所有组的面部上三分之一都存在相似的不对称模式。因此,即使对上颌严重不对称的患者,也可以参考临床照片,使用双侧 Z 或眶点的横向参考线。

相似文献

1
Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.基于三维锥形束 CT 评估正常牙合人群与不对称患者的牙颌不对称:一个关于横断参考平面的研究。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):860-7. doi: 10.2319/102911-668.1. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
2
Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.与锥形束 CT 相比,具有不对称骨骼 III 类错颌畸形和正常咬合的受试者的下颌尺寸。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Aug;142(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.024.
3
Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography.应用锥形束 CT 评估安氏Ⅱ类亚类错(牙合)骨骼和牙齿的不对称性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul;144(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.026.
4
Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.应用锥形束 CT 研究 II 类分牙合畸形的颌骨和牙齿不对称性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.027.
5
Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.使用三维计算机断层扫描对面部不对称进行形态学评估和分类。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.135. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
6
A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.一项关于不同类型下颌骨不对称骨性 III 类错颌患者上颌牙三维补偿特征的横断面研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):4973-4985. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05116-w. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
7
'Study of the maxillary yaw on cone beam computed tomography: A preliminary report and comparison between two different dento-skeletal malocclusions'.锥形束计算机断层扫描对上颌偏斜的研究:初步报告及两种不同牙颌面错畸形的比较
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Nov;26(4):576-584. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12652. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
8
Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估面部软硬组织不对称性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.038.
9
Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估不同类型错牙合畸形中的咬肌形态。
Int Orthod. 2014 Mar;12(1):32-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Does maxillary yaw exist in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry?上颌骨旋转是否存在于骨骼 III 类面不对称的患者中?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Oct;160(4):573-587. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.05.025. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Facial asymmetry of the hard and soft tissues in skeletal Class I, II, and III patients.骨骼 I 类、II 类和 III 类患者的硬组织和软组织的面部不对称。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 29;14(1):4966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55107-4.
2
Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetries in Caucasian adult patients with different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. A cone beam study using 3D segmentation and mirroring procedures.不同矢状面和垂直骨面型的白种成人患者下颌不对称的三维定量研究。使用 3D 分割和镜像程序的锥形束研究。
Head Face Med. 2023 Dec 14;19(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13005-023-00400-2.
3
Three-dimensional facial hard tissue symmetry in a healthy Caucasian population group: a systematic review.健康白种人群的三维面部硬组织对称性:系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6081-6092. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04126-w. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis.基于 CBCT 图像和统计形状分析的不同垂直型类Ⅰ和类Ⅱ患者下颌横断面积形态的比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 5;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3.
5
Quantification of three-dimensional facial asymmetry for diagnosis and postoperative evaluation of orthognathic surgery.用于正颌外科诊断及术后评估的三维面部不对称量化分析
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May 25;42(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00260-9. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Comparison of three midsagittal planes for three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography head reorientation.用于三维锥形束计算机断层扫描头部重新定位的三个正中矢状面的比较
Korean J Orthod. 2020 Jan;50(1):3-12. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.3. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Comparison of maxillomandibular asymmetries in adult patients presenting different sagittal jaw relationships.不同矢状颌关系成年患者的上颌下颌不对称性比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Sep 5;24(4):54-62. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.054-062.oar.
8
Comprehending the three-dimensional mandibular morphology of facial asymmetry patients with mandibular prognathism.理解下颌前突的面部不对称患者的下颌三维形态。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 15;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0197-6.
9
Lip line changes in Class III facial asymmetry patients after orthodontic camouflage treatment, one-jaw surgery, and two-jaw surgery: A preliminary study.正畸掩饰治疗、单颌手术和双颌手术后Ⅲ类面部不对称患者的唇线变化:一项初步研究。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Mar;87(2):239-245. doi: 10.2319/033016-254.1. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
10
Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry: A systematic review.面部不对称的三维评估:一项系统综述。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S433-7. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163491.

本文引用的文献

1
Combined 3-dimensional and mirror-image analysis for the diagnosis of asymmetry.联合三维和镜像分析诊断不对称。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):886-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.03.032.
2
Evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.利用三维锥形束计算机断层扫描评估面部不对称性。
J Clin Orthod. 2011 Feb;45(2):112-5; quiz 92.
3
Reproducibility of landmark identification in the jaw and teeth on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.颌骨和牙齿的三维锥形束 CT 图像中标志点识别的可重复性。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):843-9. doi: 10.2319/010711-5.1. Epub 2011 May 13.
4
Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans.颅测量的准确性和可靠性的侧位头颅测量和 3D 测量的 CBCT 扫描。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Jan;81(1):26-35. doi: 10.2319/032210-166.1.
5
Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.使用正畸容积再现程序构建的锥形束CT衍生三维图像的线性准确性和可靠性。
Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):387-95. doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1.
6
Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review.计算机断层扫描(CT)技术在颌面部区域测量的准确性及标志点识别的可靠性:一项系统评价
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):402-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
7
Pitch, roll, and yaw: describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits.俯仰、横滚和偏航:描述牙颌面特征的空间取向。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.032.
8
3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities.三维CT评估颌面部畸形患者的面部不对称性。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Sep;102(3):382-90. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.057. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
9
3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry.面部不对称的三维计算机断层扫描评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Feb;99(2):212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.072.
10
Assessment of facial asymmetries from posteroanterior cephalograms: validity of reference lines.从后前位头影测量片评估面部不对称:参考线的有效性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 May;123(5):512-20. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.S0889540602570347.