Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Medical College, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):860-7. doi: 10.2319/102911-668.1. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
To characterize symmetrical features of patients with facial asymmetry and thus to find the most reliable horizontal reference lines easily used in three-dimensional images. The hypothesis was that there is a difference in the location of bilateral landmarks of the upper skull between the normal occlusion sample and skeletal Class III patients with asymmetry.
Group 1 (normal occlusion sample) was composed of 20 Korean adults with normal occlusion and no noticeable asymmetry. Groups 2 through 4 were selected from patients who were diagnosed as skeletal Class III malocclusion and grouped according to the extent of asymmetry (group 2: symmetric mandible, no maxillary cant; group 3: asymmetric mandible, no maxillary cant; group 4: asymmetric mandible, more than 4 mm maxillary cant measured at maxillary first molars). Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography images were taken before treatment, and bilateral landmarks of the skull were located and their vertical and horizontal differences compared.
No statistically significant difference was noted in the position of bilateral landmarks between groups, except for AG (P < .05). AG showed significant differences in vertical dimension (P < .001) and in horizontal dimension (P < .0001) between groups. The mean of the difference was clearly greatest at FM.
The hypothesis is rejected. All groups had a similar pattern of asymmetry in the upper third of the face. Therefore, the transverse reference line of the bilateral Z or orbitale may be used even in patients with severe asymmetry of the maxilla with reference to the clinical photos.
描述面部不对称患者的对称特征,从而找到最可靠的水平参考线,以便在三维图像中轻松使用。假设正常咬合样本和存在不对称的骨性 III 类错颌患者的上颅骨双侧标志点的位置存在差异。
第 1 组(正常咬合样本)由 20 名韩国正常咬合且无明显不对称的成年人组成。第 2 组至第 4 组从被诊断为骨性 III 类错颌的患者中选择,并根据不对称程度分组(第 2 组:对称下颌,上颌无倾斜;第 3 组:不对称下颌,上颌无倾斜;第 4 组:不对称下颌,上颌第一磨牙处测量的上颌倾斜超过 4mm)。在治疗前拍摄了三维锥形束 CT 图像,并定位了颅骨双侧标志点,并比较了它们的垂直和水平差异。
除了 AG(P<0.05),各组双侧标志点的位置没有统计学差异。AG 在垂直方向(P<0.001)和水平方向(P<0.0001)上均存在显著差异。FM 处的差异平均值最大。
该假设被拒绝。所有组的面部上三分之一都存在相似的不对称模式。因此,即使对上颌严重不对称的患者,也可以参考临床照片,使用双侧 Z 或眶点的横向参考线。