• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于正颌外科诊断及术后评估的三维面部不对称量化分析

Quantification of three-dimensional facial asymmetry for diagnosis and postoperative evaluation of orthognathic surgery.

作者信息

Cao Hua-Lian, Kang Moon-Ho, Lee Jin-Yong, Park Won-Jong, Choung Han-Wool, Choung Pill-Hoon

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 03080 South Korea.

Onsam Dental Clinic, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May 25;42(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00260-9. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1186/s40902-020-00260-9
PMID:32509708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7248163/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the facial asymmetry, three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) has been used widely. This study proposed a method to quantify facial asymmetry based on 3D-CT.

METHODS

The normal standard group consisted of twenty-five male subjects who had a balanced face and normal occlusion. Five anatomical landmarks were selected as reference points and ten anatomical landmarks were selected as measurement points to evaluate facial asymmetry. The formula of facial asymmetry index was designed by using the distances between the landmarks. The index value on a specific landmark indicated zero when the landmarks were located on the three-dimensional symmetric position. As the asymmetry of landmarks increased, the value of facial asymmetry index increased. For ten anatomical landmarks, the mean value of facial asymmetry index on each landmark was obtained in the normal standard group. Facial asymmetry index was applied to the patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery. Preoperative facial asymmetry and postoperative improvement were evaluated.

RESULTS

The reference facial asymmetry index on each landmark in the normal standard group was from 1.77 to 3.38. A polygonal chart was drawn to visualize the degree of asymmetry. In three patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery, it was checked that the method of facial asymmetry index showed the preoperative facial asymmetry and the postoperative improvement well.

CONCLUSIONS

The current new facial asymmetry index could efficiently quantify the degree of facial asymmetry from 3D-CT. This method could be used as an evaluation standard for facial asymmetry analysis.

摘要

背景

为了评估面部不对称性,三维计算机断层扫描(3D - CT)已被广泛应用。本研究提出了一种基于3D - CT量化面部不对称性的方法。

方法

正常标准组由25名面部匀称且咬合正常的男性受试者组成。选择5个解剖标志点作为参考点,10个解剖标志点作为测量点来评估面部不对称性。利用标志点之间的距离设计面部不对称指数公式。当标志点位于三维对称位置时,特定标志点的指数值为零。随着标志点不对称性增加,面部不对称指数值增大。对于10个解剖标志点,在正常标准组中获得每个标志点的面部不对称指数平均值。将面部不对称指数应用于接受正颌手术的患者。评估术前面部不对称性及术后改善情况。

结果

正常标准组中每个标志点的参考面部不对称指数为1.77至3.38。绘制了多边形图表以直观显示不对称程度。在3例接受正颌手术的患者中,经检查面部不对称指数方法能很好地显示术前面部不对称性及术后改善情况。

结论

当前新的面部不对称指数能够有效地从3D - CT量化面部不对称程度。该方法可作为面部不对称分析的评估标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/f845b8f22ade/40902_2020_260_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/9fd55cd31088/40902_2020_260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/0ea39198fab6/40902_2020_260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/a04646892350/40902_2020_260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/e9e558fecb91/40902_2020_260_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/86e175ccaa7d/40902_2020_260_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/e2f297023de3/40902_2020_260_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/fcbe2653448b/40902_2020_260_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/f845b8f22ade/40902_2020_260_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/9fd55cd31088/40902_2020_260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/0ea39198fab6/40902_2020_260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/a04646892350/40902_2020_260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/e9e558fecb91/40902_2020_260_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/86e175ccaa7d/40902_2020_260_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/e2f297023de3/40902_2020_260_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/fcbe2653448b/40902_2020_260_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bb/7248163/f845b8f22ade/40902_2020_260_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantification of three-dimensional facial asymmetry for diagnosis and postoperative evaluation of orthognathic surgery.用于正颌外科诊断及术后评估的三维面部不对称量化分析
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May 25;42(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00260-9. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Treatment outcome of bimaxillary surgery for asymmetric skeletal class II deformity.双颌手术治疗不对称性骨骼 II 类畸形的治疗效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):623-632. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2462-6. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults.正常年轻成年人的面不对称指数。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013 May;16(2):97-104. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12010. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
4
Comparative validity and reproducibility study of various landmark-oriented reference planes in 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis for patients receiving orthognathic surgery.正颌手术患者三维计算机断层扫描分析中各种基于标志点的参考平面的比较有效性和可重复性研究
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 10;10(2):e0117604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117604. eCollection 2015.
5
Asymmetry index for the photogrammetric assessment of facial asymmetry.用于面部不对称性的摄影测量评估的不对称指数。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Sep;162(3):394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.030. Epub 2022 May 11.
6
3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry.面部不对称的三维计算机断层扫描评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Feb;99(2):212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.072.
7
Cleft Skeletal Asymmetry: Asymmetry Index, Classification and Application.腭裂骨骼不对称:不对称指数、分类及应用
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Mar;55(3):348-355. doi: 10.1177/1055665617732775. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
8
Facial asymmetry quantitative evaluation in oculoauriculovertebral spectrum.眼耳脊椎综合征面部不对称的定量评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Mar;20(2):219-25. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1660-8. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
9
Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.基于CBCT分析断层扫描的面部对称和不对称患者的基于地标点的正中矢状面分析。
J Orofac Orthop. 2018 Nov;79(6):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0151-3. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
10
Three-dimensional soft tissue analysis for the evaluation of facial asymmetry in normal occlusion individuals.用于评估正常咬合个体面部不对称的三维软组织分析
Korean J Orthod. 2012 Apr;42(2):56-63. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.2.56. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Digitally Guided Precision Fat Grafting for Progressive Hemifacial Atrophy.数字化引导的精准脂肪移植治疗进行性半侧颜面萎缩
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04923-8.
2
Automatic segmentation and landmark detection of 3D CBCT images using semi supervised learning for assisting orthognathic surgery planning.使用半监督学习对三维锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像进行自动分割和地标检测以辅助正颌外科手术规划。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 14;15(1):8814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93317-6.
3
Correlation Between Facial Asymmetry and Maxillary Sinus Size or Volume Using Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images.

本文引用的文献

1
Similarity index for intuitive assessment of three-dimensional facial asymmetry.直观评估三维面部不对称的相似指数。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47477-x.
2
Facial asymmetry quantitative evaluation in oculoauriculovertebral spectrum.眼耳脊椎综合征面部不对称的定量评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Mar;20(2):219-25. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1660-8. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
3
Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis.
使用牙科锥形束计算机断层扫描图像评估面部不对称与上颌窦大小或容积之间的相关性
Cureus. 2025 Mar 5;17(3):e80118. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80118. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Artificial intelligence as a prediction tool for orthognathic surgery assessment.人工智能作为正颌手术评估的预测工具。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Oct;27(5):785-794. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12805. Epub 2024 May 7.
5
Soft tissue compensation evaluation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography combined with 3D facial photographs.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描结合三维面部照片对面部不对称患者进行软组织补偿评估。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 7;10(6):e27720. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27720. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
6
Skeletal facial asymmetry: reliability of manual and artificial intelligence-driven analysis.骨骼面部不对称:手动和人工智能驱动分析的可靠性。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Jan 11;53(1):52-59. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twad006.
7
Correlations Between Mandibular Asymmetries and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review.下颌不对称与颞下颌关节紊乱病之间的相关性:一项系统评价
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021 Jul 3;11(5):481-489. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_130_21. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
8
Transverse Asymmetries of the Maxilla Even in Healthy and Apparently Symmetrical Subjects.上颌骨的横向不对称性:即使在健康且表面对称的受试者中也是如此。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;18(2):446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020446.
利用软组织作为参考对面部不对称性进行诊断的三维锥形束 CT 图像重定向。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):38-47. doi: 10.2319/112112-890.1. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
4
Three-dimensional soft tissue analysis for the evaluation of facial asymmetry in normal occlusion individuals.用于评估正常咬合个体面部不对称的三维软组织分析
Korean J Orthod. 2012 Apr;42(2):56-63. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.2.56. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
5
Three-dimensional mandibular change after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a semirigid sliding plate system for fixation of a mandibular setback surgery.下颌支矢状劈开截骨术后采用半刚性滑动钢板系统固定下颌后退术后的三维下颌变化。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Feb;115(2):157-66. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.02.022. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
6
Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.基于三维锥形束 CT 评估正常牙合人群与不对称患者的牙颌不对称:一个关于横断参考平面的研究。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):860-7. doi: 10.2319/102911-668.1. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7
Combined 3-dimensional and mirror-image analysis for the diagnosis of asymmetry.联合三维和镜像分析诊断不对称。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Dec;140(6):886-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.03.032.
8
Evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography.利用三维锥形束计算机断层扫描评估面部不对称性。
J Clin Orthod. 2011 Feb;45(2):112-5; quiz 92.
9
Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry.面部不对称的三维感知。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):647-53. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq146. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
10
New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery.用于正颌外科手术的新型三维头影测量分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;69(3):606-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.010. Epub 2011 Jan 22.