Suppr超能文献

在 84 周的时间里,每周一次艾塞那肽与根据目标调整剂量的甘精胰岛素相比,用于 2 型糖尿病患者的安全性和疗效。

Safety and efficacy of once-weekly exenatide compared with insulin glargine titrated to target in patients with type 2 diabetes over 84 weeks.

机构信息

Diabetes Center,VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2012 Apr;35(4):683-9. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1233. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We recently reported that after 26 weeks, exenatide once weekly (EQW) resulted in superior A1C reduction, reduced hypoglycemia, and progressive weight loss compared with daily insulin glargine (IG) in patients with type 2 diabetes who were taking metformin alone or with sulfonylurea. This 84-week extension study assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of EQW versus IG.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-arm, parallel trial assessed change in A1C, proportions of patients achieving A1C <7.0 and ≤6.5%, body weight, incidence of hypoglycemia, and overall safety.

RESULTS

Of 415 patients who completed 26 weeks, 390 (194 EQW and 196 IG patients) entered the extension study. At 84 weeks, A1C decreased from baseline (8.3%) by -1.2% for EQW vs. -1.0% for IG (P = 0.029). The proportions of patients who achieved end point A1C targets <7.0 and ≤6.5% were 44.6% for EQW patients vs. 36.8% for IG patients (P = 0.084) and 31.3% for EQW patients vs. 20.2% for IG patients (P = 0.009), respectively. Patients taking EQW lost 2.1 kg of body weight, whereas those taking IG gained 2.4 kg (P < 0.001). Among patients taking metformin plus sulfonylurea, the incidence of minor hypoglycemia was 24% for EQW patients vs. 54% for IG patients (P < 0.001); among patients taking metformin alone, it was 8% for EQW patients vs. 32% for IG patients (P < 0.001). Among adverse events occurring in ≥5% of patients, diarrhea and nausea occurred more frequently (P < 0.05) in the EQW group than in the IG group (12 vs. 6% and 15 vs. 1%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

After 84 weeks, patients treated with EQW continued to experience better glycemic control with sustained overall weight loss and a lower risk of hypoglycemia than patients treated with IG.

摘要

目的

我们最近报道,与单独使用二甲双胍或与磺脲类药物合用的 2 型糖尿病患者相比,在接受 26 周治疗后,每周一次艾塞那肽(EQW)治疗可降低糖化血红蛋白(A1C),减少低血糖,并且体重持续减轻。本研究是一项 84 周的延长研究,评估了 EQW 与 IG 的长期安全性和疗效。

研究设计和方法

这项多中心、开放标签、随机、双臂、平行试验评估了 A1C 的变化、达到 A1C<7.0%和≤6.5%的患者比例、体重、低血糖发生率和整体安全性。

结果

在完成 26 周治疗的 415 例患者中,有 390 例(194 例 EQW 和 196 例 IG 患者)进入了扩展研究。84 周时,EQW 组的 A1C 从基线(8.3%)下降了-1.2%,而 IG 组为-1.0%(P=0.029)。达到终点 A1C 目标<7.0%和≤6.5%的患者比例分别为 44.6%和 36.8%(P=0.084),分别为 31.3%和 20.2%(P=0.009)。服用 EQW 的患者体重减轻了 2.1 公斤,而服用 IG 的患者体重增加了 2.4 公斤(P<0.001)。在服用二甲双胍加磺脲类药物的患者中,EQW 组的轻度低血糖发生率为 24%,IG 组为 54%(P<0.001);在服用二甲双胍的患者中,EQW 组为 8%,IG 组为 32%(P<0.001)。在≥5%的患者出现的不良反应中,腹泻和恶心在 EQW 组更为常见(P<0.05),分别为 12%和 15%,IG 组为 6%和 1%。

结论

84 周后,与接受 IG 治疗的患者相比,接受 EQW 治疗的患者继续获得更好的血糖控制,并且总体上持续减轻体重,低血糖风险更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/958e/3308312/fd514fc176aa/683fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验