Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Center for Integrative & Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2012 May;107(10):2794-807. doi: 10.1152/jn.00803.2011. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
Although previous research with human and nonhuman primates has examined the neural correlates of performance monitoring, discrepancies in methodology have limited our ability to make cross-species generalizations. One major obstacle arises from the use of different behavioral responses and tasks across different primate species. Specifically, it is unknown whether performance-monitoring mechanisms rely on different neural circuitry in tasks requiring oculomotor vs. skeletomotor responses. Here, we show that the human error-related negativity (ERN) elicited by a saccadic eye-movement response relative to a manual response differs in several critical ways. The human saccadic ERN exhibits a prolonged duration, a broader frontomedial voltage distribution, and different neural source estimates than the manual ERN in exactly the same stop-signal task. The human saccadic error positivity (Pe) exhibited a frontomedial voltage distribution with estimated electrical sources in supplementary motor area and rostral anterior cingulate cortex for saccadic responses, whereas the manual Pe showed a posterior scalp distribution and potential origins in the superior parietal lobule. These findings constrain models of the cognitive mechanisms indexed by the ERN/Pe complex. Moreover, by paralleling work with nonhuman primates performing the same saccadic stop-signal task (Godlove et al. 2011), we demonstrate a cross-species homology of error event-related potentials (ERPs) and lay the groundwork for definitively localizing the neural sources of performance-monitoring ERPs.
虽然之前的人类和非人类灵长类动物研究已经考察了表现监测的神经相关性,但由于不同物种的方法学差异,我们无法进行跨物种的概括。一个主要的障碍来自于不同灵长类物种使用不同的行为反应和任务。具体来说,尚不清楚在需要眼球运动反应与骨骼运动反应的任务中,表现监测机制是否依赖于不同的神经回路。在这里,我们表明,相对于手动反应,由扫视眼动反应引起的人类错误相关负波(ERN)在几个关键方面存在差异。在完全相同的停止信号任务中,人类扫视 ERN 表现出较长的持续时间、更广泛的额-内侧电压分布,以及与手动 ERN 不同的神经源估计。人类扫视错误正波(Pe)表现出额-内侧电压分布,其在补充运动区和额前扣带皮质的估计电源用于扫视反应,而手动 Pe 则显示出后头皮分布和上顶叶的潜在起源。这些发现限制了由 ERN/Pe 复合体标记的认知机制模型。此外,通过与执行相同扫视停止信号任务的非人类灵长类动物的平行工作(Godlove 等人,2011 年),我们证明了错误事件相关电位(ERPs)的跨物种同源性,并为明确定位表现监测 ERPs 的神经源奠定了基础。