• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

七种用于熟鸡蛋的微生物采样程序的比较。

A comparison of seven microbiological sampling procedures for hard-cooked eggs.

作者信息

Fletcher D L, Smith D P, Cox N A

机构信息

Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 1990 Aug;69(8):1428-32. doi: 10.3382/ps.0691428.

DOI:10.3382/ps.0691428
PMID:2235855
Abstract

Seven microbiological sampling methods for hard-cooked eggs were evaluated and compared. Fresh eggs within 24 h of oviposition were cooked at 98 C for 22 min in water and then cooled in 31 C water. Eggs were dipped for 10 min in a physiological saline solution (.85% saline) 10 C cooler than the eggs and containing known numbers of bacteria. Eggs were then stored for 4 days at 6 C and sampled using one of seven rinse or blend procedures on whole eggs, shell, shelled egg contents, or shelled egg contents plus shell. Highest recoveries were made from the peeled egg plus shell rinse, shell rinse, whole egg blend, and shell blend. Lowest recoveries were found with the whole egg rinse, the peeled egg rinse, and the peeled egg blend. These results indicate that significant numbers of organisms are associated with the inner and outer shell surfaces as well as the egg contents surface (albumen). Satisfactory recoveries can be made with the peeled egg plus shell rinse or the whole egg blend. Whole egg rinsing of hard-cooked eggs does not appear to be satisfactory.

摘要

对七种用于熟鸡蛋的微生物采样方法进行了评估和比较。刚产下24小时内的新鲜鸡蛋在98℃的水中煮22分钟,然后在31℃的水中冷却。将鸡蛋浸入比鸡蛋温度低10℃且含有已知数量细菌的生理盐水溶液(0.85%盐水)中10分钟。然后将鸡蛋在6℃下储存4天,并使用七种冲洗或混合程序之一对全蛋、蛋壳、去壳蛋液或去壳蛋液加蛋壳进行采样。从带壳去皮鸡蛋冲洗液、蛋壳冲洗液、全蛋混合液和蛋壳混合液中回收率最高。全蛋冲洗液、带壳去皮鸡蛋冲洗液和带壳去皮鸡蛋混合液的回收率最低。这些结果表明,大量微生物存在于蛋壳内外表面以及蛋液表面(蛋白)。带壳去皮鸡蛋冲洗液或全蛋混合液可获得满意的回收率。对熟鸡蛋进行全蛋冲洗似乎并不令人满意。

相似文献

1
A comparison of seven microbiological sampling procedures for hard-cooked eggs.七种用于熟鸡蛋的微生物采样程序的比较。
Poult Sci. 1990 Aug;69(8):1428-32. doi: 10.3382/ps.0691428.
2
Recovery of Salmonella serovar Enteritidis from inoculated broiler hatching eggs using shell rinse and shell crush sampling methods.采用蛋壳冲洗和蛋壳破碎采样方法从接种鸡胚孵化蛋中回收肠炎沙门氏菌血清型。
Poult Sci. 2014 Aug;93(8):2117-22. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-03992. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
3
Comparison between rinse and crush-and-rub sampling for aerobic bacteria recovery from broiler hatching eggs after sanitization.消毒后从孵化鸡蛋中回收好氧细菌时,冲洗与压碎和摩擦取样的比较。
Poult Sci. 2011 Jul;90(7):1609-15. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01305.
4
Assessing the impact of egg sweating on Salmonella Enteritidis penetration into shell eggs.评估蛋汗对肠炎沙门氏菌穿透蛋壳蛋的影响。
Poult Sci. 2017 Jul 1;96(7):2393-2399. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex011.
5
Eggshell factors influencing eggshell penetration and whole egg contamination by different bacteria, including Salmonella enteritidis.影响蛋壳穿透及不同细菌(包括肠炎沙门氏菌)对全蛋污染的蛋壳因素。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Dec 1;112(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.04.011. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
6
Microbial barrier properties of hen egg shells.鸡蛋壳的微生物屏障特性。
Microbios. 1991;68(276-277):137-46.
7
Comparison of eggshell surface sanitization technologies and impacts on consumer acceptability.蛋壳表面消毒技术的比较及其对消费者接受度的影响。
Poult Sci. 2016 May;95(5):1191-7. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew014. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
8
Contamination of egg shell and contents with Salmonella enteritidis: a review.肠炎沙门氏菌对蛋壳及蛋内容物的污染:综述
Int J Food Microbiol. 1994 Jan;21(1-2):31-40. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90197-x.
9
Numbers of Salmonella enteritidis in the contents of naturally contaminated hens' eggs.自然污染鸡蛋内容物中的肠炎沙门氏菌数量。
Epidemiol Infect. 1991 Jun;106(3):489-96. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800067546.
10
Effects of egg shell quality and washing on Salmonella Infantis penetration.鸡蛋壳质量和清洗对婴儿沙门氏菌穿透的影响。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Jul 15;165(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 9.