Al-Ajeeli Morouj N, Taylor T Matthew, Alvarado Christine Z, Coufal Craig D
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2253.
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX 77843-2471.
Poult Sci. 2016 May;95(5):1191-7. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew014. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
Shell eggs can be contaminated with many types of microorganisms, including bacterial pathogens, and thus present a risk for the transmission of foodborne disease to consumers. Currently, most United States egg processors utilize egg washing and sanitization systems to decontaminate surfaces of shell eggs prior to packaging. However, previous research has indicated that current shell egg sanitization technologies employed in the commercial egg industry may not completely eliminate bacteria from the surface of eggshells, and thus alternative egg sanitization technologies with the potential for increased microbial reductions on eggshells should be investigated. The objectives of this study were to compare the antimicrobial efficacy and consumer sensory attributes of industry-available eggshell sanitization methods (chlorine and quaternary ammonium compounds (QAC) applied via spray) to various alternative egg sanitization technologies. Eggs (White Leghorn hens; n=195) were obtained for evaluation of sanitizer-induced reduction in mesophilic aerobic bacteria (n=90) or inoculated Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) reduction (n=105). Sanitizing treatments evaluated in this experiment were: chlorine spray (100 ppm available chlorine), QAC spray (200 ppm), peracetic acid spray (PAA; 135 ppm) alone or in combination with ultraviolet light (UV; 254 nm), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; 3.5% solution) spray in combination with UV (H2O2+UV). For enumeration of aerobic bacteria, eggs were sampled at 0, 7, and 14 days of storage at 4°C; surviving SE cells from inoculated eggs were enumerated by differential plating. Sensory trials were conducted to determine consumer liking of scrambled eggs made from eggs sanitized with chlorine, QAC, H2O2+UV, or no treatment (control). The H2O2 and UV treatment resulted in the greatest reductions in eggshell aerobic plate counts compared to other treatments throughout egg storage (P<0.05). All treatments utilized reduced SE below the limit of detection by eggshell rinse. There were no differences in consumers' liking of overall flavor between the 4 treatments evaluated. The application of H2O2+UV treatment to shell eggs represents a novel technology that could have important implications for egg quality and safety preservation.
带壳蛋可能被多种微生物污染,包括细菌病原体,因此存在将食源性疾病传播给消费者的风险。目前,美国大多数鸡蛋加工商在包装前利用洗蛋和消毒系统对带壳蛋的表面进行去污处理。然而,先前的研究表明,商业蛋品行业目前采用的带壳蛋消毒技术可能无法完全消除蛋壳表面的细菌,因此应研究具有增加蛋壳微生物减少潜力的替代蛋品消毒技术。本研究的目的是比较工业上可用的蛋壳消毒方法(通过喷雾应用氯和季铵化合物(QAC))与各种替代蛋品消毒技术的抗菌效果和消费者感官属性。获取鸡蛋(白来航鸡;n = 195)用于评估消毒剂引起的嗜温需氧菌减少情况(n = 90)或接种肠炎沙门氏菌(SE)的减少情况(n = 105)。本实验评估的消毒处理为:氯喷雾(有效氯100 ppm)、QAC喷雾(200 ppm)、过氧乙酸喷雾(PAA;135 ppm)单独使用或与紫外线(UV;254 nm)联合使用,以及过氧化氢(H2O2;3.5%溶液)喷雾与UV联合使用(H2O2 + UV)。为了对需氧菌进行计数,在4°C储存0、7和14天时对鸡蛋进行采样;通过鉴别平板培养对接种鸡蛋中存活的SE细胞进行计数。进行感官试验以确定消费者对用氯、QAC、H2O2 + UV消毒或未处理(对照)的鸡蛋制成的炒鸡蛋的喜好程度。与整个鸡蛋储存期间的其他处理相比,H2O2和UV处理导致蛋壳需氧平板计数的减少最大(P < 0.05)。所有处理均将蛋壳冲洗液中的SE减少到检测限以下。在所评估的4种处理之间,消费者对整体风味的喜好没有差异。将H2O2 + UV处理应用于带壳蛋代表了一种新技术,这可能对蛋品质量和安全保存具有重要意义。