Department of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2012 May;23(5):792-805. doi: 10.1007/s13361-012-0339-5. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
When utilized in conjunction with modeling, the collision cross section (Ω) from ion mobility spectrometry can be used to deduce the gas phase structures of analyte ions. Gas phase conformations are determined computationally, and their Ω calculated using an approximate method, the results of which are compared with experimental data. Though prior work has focused upon rigid small molecules or large biomolecules, correlation of computational and experimental Ω has not been thoroughly examined for analytes with intermediate conformational flexibility, which constitute a large fraction of the molecules studied in the field. Here, the computational paradigm for calculating Ω has been tested for the tripeptides WGY, YGW, and YWG (Y = tyrosine, W = tryptophan, G = glycine). Experimental data indicate that Ω(exp) (YWG) > Ω(exp) (WGY) ≈ Ω(exp) (YGW). The energy distributions of conformations obtained from tiers of simulated annealing molecular dynamics (SAMD) were analyzed using a wide array of density functionals. These quantum mechanical energy distributions do not agree with the MD data, which leads to structural differences between the SAMD and DFT conformations. The latter structures are obtained by reoptimization of the SAMD geometries, and are the only suite of structures that reproduce the experimental trend in analyte separability. In the absence of fitting Lennard Jones potentials that reproduce experimental results for the Trajectory Method, the Exact Hard Sphere Scattering method produced numerical values that are in best agreement with the experimental cross sections obtained in He drift gas.
当与建模结合使用时,离子淌度谱的碰撞截面 (Ω) 可用于推断分析物离子的气相结构。气相构象通过计算确定,其 Ω 使用近似方法计算,将结果与实验数据进行比较。虽然之前的工作集中在刚性小分子或大型生物分子上,但对于具有中间构象灵活性的分析物,计算和实验 Ω 的相关性尚未得到彻底检查,而这些分析物构成了该领域研究的大部分分子。在这里,已经针对三肽 WGY、YGW 和 YWG(Y = 酪氨酸,W = 色氨酸,G = 甘氨酸)测试了计算 Ω 的计算范例。实验数据表明,Ω(exp)(YWG)>Ω(exp)(WGY)≈Ω(exp)(YGW)。使用各种密度泛函对从模拟退火分子动力学(SAMD)各层获得的构象的能量分布进行了分析。这些量子力学能量分布与 MD 数据不一致,这导致了 SAMD 和 DFT 构象之间的结构差异。后者的结构是通过对 SAMD 几何形状进行重新优化得到的,是唯一一套能够重现分析物可分离性实验趋势的结构。在没有拟合 Lennard-Jones 势以重现轨迹法实验结果的情况下,精确硬球散射法产生的数值与在 He 漂移气体中获得的实验截面最吻合。