Institut de Recherche pour le Développement/University Montpellier 1, UMI 233, Montpellier, France.
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031726. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Bone status in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral treatment (ART) is poorly documented in resource-limited settings. We compared bone mineral density between HIV-infected patients and control subjects from Dakar, Senegal.
A total of 207 (134 women and 73 men) HIV-infected patients from an observational cohort in Dakar (ANRS 1215) and 207 age- and sex-matched controls from the general population were enrolled. Bone mineral density was assessed by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the calcaneus, an alternative to the reference method (i.e. dual X-absorptiometry), often not available in resource-limited countries.
Mean age was 47.0 (±8.5) years. Patients had received ART for a median duration of 8.8 years; 45% received a protease inhibitor and 27% tenofovir; 84% had undetectable viral load. Patients had lower body mass index (BMI) than controls (23 versus 26 kg/m(2), P<0.001). In unadjusted analysis, QUS bone mineral density was lower in HIV-infected patients than in controls (difference: -0.36 standard deviation, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.59;-0.12, P = 0.003). Adjusting for BMI, physical activity, smoking and calcium intake attenuated the difference (-0.27, CI: -0.53;-0.002, P = 0.05). Differences in BMI between patients and controls explained a third of the difference in QUS bone mineral density. Among patients, BMI was independently associated with QUS bone mineral density (P<0.001). An association between undetectable viral load and QUS bone density was also suggested (β = 0.48, CI: 0.02;0.93; P = 0.04). No association between protease inhibitor or tenofovir use and QUS bone mineral density was found.
Senegalese HIV-infected patients had reduced QUS bone mineral density in comparison with control subjects, in part related to their lower BMI. Further investigation is needed to clarify the clinical significance of these observations.
在资源有限的环境中,关于接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的 HIV 感染者的骨骼状况,相关文献记载很少。我们对比了塞内加尔达喀尔的 HIV 感染者和对照者的骨密度。
我们共招募了 207 名(134 名女性和 73 名男性)来自达喀尔观察队列的 HIV 感染者(ANRS 1215)和 207 名年龄和性别匹配的一般人群对照者。采用跟参考方法(即双能 X 线吸收法)相比,常应用于资源有限国家的替代性方法——定量超声(QUS)评估跟骨的骨矿物质密度。
平均年龄为 47.0(±8.5)岁。患者接受 ART 的中位时间为 8.8 年;45%的患者接受蛋白酶抑制剂治疗,27%的患者接受替诺福韦治疗;84%的患者病毒载量不可检测。与对照组相比,患者的体重指数(BMI)较低(23 比 26kg/m2,P<0.001)。在未调整分析中,HIV 感染者的 QUS 骨矿物质密度低于对照组(差值:-0.36 标准差,95%置信区间(CI):-0.59;-0.12,P=0.003)。调整 BMI、体力活动、吸烟和钙摄入量后,差值减弱(-0.27,CI:-0.53;-0.002,P=0.05)。患者和对照组 BMI 的差异解释了 QUS 骨矿物质密度差异的三分之一。在患者中,BMI 与 QUS 骨矿物质密度独立相关(P<0.001)。病毒载量不可检测与 QUS 骨密度之间也存在关联(β=0.48,CI:0.02;0.93;P=0.04)。未发现蛋白酶抑制剂或替诺福韦的使用与 QUS 骨矿物质密度之间存在关联。
与对照组相比,塞内加尔的 HIV 感染者的 QUS 骨矿物质密度降低,部分原因与 BMI 较低有关。需要进一步研究以阐明这些观察结果的临床意义。