Medical Research Council Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032016. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
The RSC chromatin remodeling complex has been implicated in contributing to DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in a number of studies. Both survival and levels of H2A phosphorylation in response to damage are reduced in the absence of RSC. Importantly, there is evidence for two isoforms of this complex, defined by the presence of either Rsc1 or Rsc2. Here, we investigated whether the two isoforms of RSC provide distinct contributions to DNA damage responses. First, we established that the two isoforms of RSC differ in the presence of Rsc1 or Rsc2 but otherwise have the same subunit composition. We found that both rsc1 and rsc2 mutant strains have intact DNA damage-induced checkpoint activity and transcriptional induction. In addition, both strains show reduced non-homologous end joining activity and have a similar spectrum of DSB repair junctions, suggesting perhaps that the two complexes provide the same functions. However, the hypersensitivity of a rsc1 strain cannot be complemented with an extra copy of RSC2, and likewise, the hypersensitivity of the rsc2 strain remains unchanged when an additional copy of RSC1 is present, indicating that the two proteins are unable to functionally compensate for one another in DNA damage responses. Rsc1, but not Rsc2, is required for nucleosome sliding flanking a DNA DSB. Interestingly, while swapping the domains from Rsc1 into the Rsc2 protein does not compromise hypersensitivity to DNA damage suggesting they are functionally interchangeable, the BAH domain from Rsc1 confers upon Rsc2 the ability to remodel chromatin at a DNA break. These data demonstrate that, despite the similarity between Rsc1 and Rsc2, the two different isoforms of RSC provide distinct functions in DNA damage responses, and that at least part of the functional specificity is dictated by the BAH domains.
RSC 染色质重塑复合物在许多研究中被认为有助于 DNA 双链断裂 (DSB) 的修复。在没有 RSC 的情况下,存活和 H2A 磷酸化水平对损伤的反应都降低了。重要的是,有证据表明该复合物有两种同工型,由存在 Rsc1 或 Rsc2 来定义。在这里,我们研究了这两种 RSC 同工型是否对 DNA 损伤反应有不同的贡献。首先,我们确定了两种 RSC 同工型在存在 Rsc1 或 Rsc2 方面存在差异,但在其他方面具有相同的亚基组成。我们发现,rsc1 和 rsc2 突变株都具有完整的 DNA 损伤诱导的检查点活性和转录诱导。此外,两种菌株的非同源末端连接活性都降低,并且具有相似的 DSB 修复接头谱,这表明这两种复合物可能提供相同的功能。然而,rsc1 菌株的超敏性不能用额外的 RSC2 拷贝来弥补,同样,当存在额外的 RSC1 拷贝时,rsc2 菌株的超敏性仍然不变,表明这两种蛋白质在 DNA 损伤反应中不能相互功能补偿。Rsc1,但不是 Rsc2,是 DNA DSB 侧翼核小体滑动所必需的。有趣的是,虽然将 Rsc1 的结构域交换到 Rsc2 蛋白中不会损害对 DNA 损伤的超敏性,表明它们在功能上是可互换的,但 Rsc1 的 BAH 结构域赋予 Rsc2 在 DNA 断裂处重塑染色质的能力。这些数据表明,尽管 Rsc1 和 Rsc2 之间存在相似性,但两种不同的 RSC 同工型在 DNA 损伤反应中提供了不同的功能,至少部分功能特异性是由 BAH 结构域决定的。