• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创半肾切除术:可行性和结果。

Minimally invasive heminephrectomy: feasibility and outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York 10467, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2012 Jul;26(7):866-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0534. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1089/end.2011.0534
PMID:22360474
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has become a well-established treatment for patients with selected renal malignancies. As the skills of urologic laparoscopic surgeons have increased, more complex and larger tumors are now being approached in this manner. Laparoscopic heminephrectomy (LHN), defined as the resection of >30% of a kidney, is described in this article. Standardized nephrometry scoring is used to grade tumor complexity; complications, renal function, and perioperative outcomes are discussed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-five patients underwent minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Parameters studied included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), clamp time, change in renal function over time, and complication rate using the Clavien system.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients underwent LHN. Patients who had LHN performed had significantly larger tumors (4.7 vs 2.6 cm, P=0.05) with higher nephrometry scoring (6.6 vs 5.0, P=0.007). On univariate analysis, both operative (176.0 vs 151.6 min, P=0.036) and clamp time (29.3 vs 21.9 min, P=0.003) were significantly increased. There was no difference in LOS, EBL, change of renal function over time, or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

LHN is efficacious and feasible. Although both operative and clamp times were significantly increased, there was no significant impact on LOS, EBL, change in renal function over time, or complication rate.

摘要

背景与目的

腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)已成为治疗特定肾恶性肿瘤患者的一种成熟治疗方法。随着泌尿外科腹腔镜外科医生技能的提高,现在以这种方式处理更复杂和更大的肿瘤。本文描述了腹腔镜半肾切除术(LHN),定义为切除肾脏的> 30%。采用标准化肾切除术评分来分级肿瘤的复杂性;讨论并发症,肾功能和围手术期结果。

患者与方法

145 名患者接受了微创部分肾切除术。研究的参数包括患者的人口统计学,肿瘤特征,手术时间,估计失血量(EBL),住院时间(LOS),夹闭时间,随时间推移肾功能的变化以及使用Clavien 系统的并发症发生率。

结果

24 例患者接受了 LHN。接受 LHN 的患者的肿瘤明显更大(4.7 与 2.6 cm,P=0.05),肾切除术评分更高(6.6 与 5.0,P=0.007)。在单因素分析中,手术(176.0 与 151.6 min,P=0.036)和夹闭时间(29.3 与 21.9 min,P=0.003)均明显延长。LOS,EBL,随时间推移肾功能的变化或并发症无差异。

结论

LHN 是有效且可行的。尽管手术和夹闭时间均明显增加,但对 LOS,EBL,随时间推移肾功能的变化或并发症发生率没有明显影响。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive heminephrectomy: feasibility and outcomes.微创半肾切除术:可行性和结果。
J Endourol. 2012 Jul;26(7):866-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0534. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
2
Perioperative and renal function outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for T1b and T2a kidney tumors.微创部分肾切除术治疗 T1b 和 T2a 期肾肿瘤的围手术期和肾功能结果。
J Endourol. 2012 Mar;26(3):244-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0384. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
3
Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage.离断与完全阻断控制腹腔镜肾部分切除术:按临床分期比较。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10592.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
4
A prospective comparison of surgical and pathological outcomes obtained after robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in moderate to complex renal tumours: results from a French multicentre collaborative study.机器人辅助或单纯腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗中大型复杂肾肿瘤的前瞻性比较:来自法国多中心合作研究的结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):256-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11528.x. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
5
Comparison of perioperative outcomes of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy after adjusting for tumor complexity.在对肿瘤复杂性进行校正后,比较腹膜后与经腹微创部分肾切除术的围手术期结局。
Urology. 2014 Dec;84(6):1355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.045. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
6
Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score of 7 or higher).机器人辅助与腹腔镜下复杂性肾肿瘤(RENAL肾计量评分7分及以上)部分肾切除术围手术期结果的比较
Korean J Urol. 2014 Dec;55(12):808-13. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.12.808. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
7
Single surgeon's experience with laparoscopic versus robotic partial nephrectomy: perioperative outcomes/complications and influence of tumor characteristics on choice of therapy.单名外科医生腹腔镜与机器人辅助肾部分切除术的经验:围手术期结果/并发症以及肿瘤特征对治疗选择的影响
Can J Urol. 2012 Oct;19(5):6465-70.
8
Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases.446 例连续病例中机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗肾门与非肾门病变的多机构分析。
Eur Urol. 2011 Mar;59(3):325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.017. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
9
External validation of a model for tailoring the operative approach to minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.经皮肾镜取石术后尿石症复发的预测模型:单中心经验报告。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1806-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09633.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
10
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.腹腔镜下肾部分切除术
J Endourol. 2005 Jul-Aug;19(6):634-42. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.634.