• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中国广州,新入组接受美沙酮维持治疗的首次吸毒者中,错误认知可前瞻性地预测其脱落和治疗依从性差。

Misconceptions predict dropout and poor adherence prospectively among newly admitted first-time methadone maintenance treatment clients in Guangzhou, China.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Addiction. 2012 Sep;107(9):1641-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03859.x. Epub 2012 May 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03859.x
PMID:22360534
Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the incidence of dropout and the prevalence of poor adherence among newly admitted first-time clients of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) clinics, and the associations between MMT-related misconceptions and these two treatment outcomes.

DESIGN

A cohort study (maximum follow-up period = 17.6 months) was conducted.

SETTING

Three of the nine MMT clinics in Guangzhou, China participated in the study.

PARTICIPANTS

The sample included 158 newly admitted first-time MMT clients.

MEASUREMENTS

Information collected included background characteristics, history of drug use, MMT-related misconceptions, dropout during the entire study period and poor adherence within the first 6 months since admission to MMT.

FINDINGS

Of all newly admitted MMT clients, 98.2% possessed at least one and 50.6% possessed all four types of MMT-related misconception; 51.3% had dropped out before the completion of the study [95% confidence interval (CI): 43.5-59.1%] and 62% exhibited poor adherence within the first 6 months since admission (95% CI: 54.2-69.6%). Adjusting for significant background variables, the number of misconceived responses predicted significantly both dropout [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.80 for two to three misconceived items, HR = 7.13 for four misconceived items, with zero to one misconceived item being the reference] and poor adherence within the first 6 months [relative risk (RR) = 4.13 for two to three misconceived items; RR = 4.40 for four misconceived items, with zero to one misconceived item being the reference.

CONCLUSIONS

Among opiate addicts in China prescribed methadone maintenance therapy for the first time, misconceptions about this medication are prevalent and are associated with poor adherence to the medication regimen and a high a rate of dropout from the treatment programme.

摘要

目的

调查美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)门诊新入组首次接受治疗的患者脱落率和治疗不依从的发生率,并探讨与 MMT 相关的误解与这两种治疗结局之间的关系。

设计

一项队列研究(最长随访期=17.6 个月)。

地点

中国广州的 9 个 MMT 门诊中的 3 个参与了本研究。

参与者

研究纳入了 158 名新入组的首次接受 MMT 治疗的患者。

测量

收集的信息包括背景特征、药物使用史、与 MMT 相关的误解、整个研究期间的脱落情况以及入组 MMT 后前 6 个月的治疗不依从情况。

结果

所有新入组的 MMT 患者中,98.2%的患者存在至少一种误解,50.6%的患者存在全部四种误解;51.3%的患者在研究完成前已经脱落[95%可信区间(CI):43.5%-59.1%],62%的患者在入组 MMT 后前 6 个月内治疗不依从[95%CI:54.2%-69.6%]。在调整了显著的背景变量后,误解的回答数量显著预测了脱落[风险比(HR):2-3 个误解项目时为 3.80,4 个误解项目时为 7.13,以 1 个误解项目为参照]和入组 MMT 后前 6 个月内的不依从[相对风险(RR):2-3 个误解项目时为 4.13,4 个误解项目时为 4.40,以 1 个误解项目为参照]。

结论

在中国首次接受美沙酮维持治疗的阿片类药物成瘾者中,对这种药物的误解普遍存在,且与不依从药物治疗方案和治疗方案脱落率高有关。

相似文献

1
Misconceptions predict dropout and poor adherence prospectively among newly admitted first-time methadone maintenance treatment clients in Guangzhou, China.在中国广州,新入组接受美沙酮维持治疗的首次吸毒者中,错误认知可前瞻性地预测其脱落和治疗依从性差。
Addiction. 2012 Sep;107(9):1641-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03859.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
2
Misconceptions toward methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and associated factors among new MMT users in Guangzhou, China.广州市新美沙酮维持治疗使用者对美沙酮维持治疗的误解及相关因素。
Addict Behav. 2012 May;37(5):657-62. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
3
Club drugs and alcohol abuse predicted dropout and poor adherence among methadone maintenance treatment patients in Guangzhou, China.在中国广州,新型毒品和酒精滥用是美沙酮维持治疗患者辍学及依从性差的预测因素。
AIDS Care. 2017 Apr;29(4):458-463. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1259452. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
4
Trends and predictors in methadone maintenance treatment dropout in Shanghai, China: 2005-2011.中国上海美沙酮维持治疗脱失率的趋势和预测因素:2005-2011 年。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Jul;29(7):731-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.796284. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
5
Predictors of early dropout in methadone maintenance treatment program in Yunnan province, China.中国云南省美沙酮维持治疗项目早期脱落的预测因素。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010 May;29(3):263-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00157.x.
6
Retention in methadone maintenance treatment in mainland China, 2004-2012: a literature review.2004-2012 年中国大陆美沙酮维持治疗的维持率:文献复习。
Addict Behav. 2014 Jan;39(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
7
Problem drinking in relation to treatment outcome among opiate addicts in methadone maintenance treatment.美沙酮维持治疗中阿片类成瘾者的问题饮酒与治疗结果的关系
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 Jan;26(1):55-63. doi: 10.1080/09595230601036994.
8
Low risk for hepatitis C seroconversion in methadone maintenance treatment.美沙酮维持治疗中丙型肝炎血清转换的低风险。
J Addict Med. 2011 Sep;5(3):214-20. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31820e13dd.
9
Patterns of abstinence or continued drug use among methadone maintenance patients and their relation to treatment retention.美沙酮维持治疗患者的戒断或持续用药模式及其与治疗保留的关系。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014 Apr-Jun;46(2):114-22. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2014.901587.
10
Retention and its predictors among methadone maintenance treatment clients in China: a six-year cohort study.中国美沙酮维持治疗患者的留存率及其预测因素:一项为期六年的队列研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Dec 1;145:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.776. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment non-adherence among methadone maintenance patients and associated factors: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in Vietnam.美沙酮维持治疗患者的治疗不依从性及其相关因素:越南一项多中心、横断面研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jul 3;21(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01040-8.
2
A systematic review of patients' and providers' perspectives of medications for treatment of opioid use disorder.对患者和医疗服务提供者关于阿片类物质使用障碍治疗药物观点的系统评价。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Dec;119:108146. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108146. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
3
Retention of patients in opioid substitution treatment: A systematic review.
阿片类药物替代治疗中患者的保留情况:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232086. eCollection 2020.
4
The Decade-Long Chinese Methadone Maintenance Therapy Yields Large Population and Economic Benefits for Drug Users in Reducing Harm, HIV and HCV Disease Burden.长达十年的中国美沙酮维持治疗为吸毒者带来了巨大的人口和经济效益,减少了危害、艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎疾病负担。
Front Public Health. 2019 Nov 12;7:327. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00327. eCollection 2019.
5
Effectiveness of a Psycho-Social Intervention Aimed at Reducing Attrition at Methadone Maintenance Treatment Clinics: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.心理社会干预对减少美沙酮维持治疗诊所脱落率的效果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 7;16(22):4337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224337.
6
Brief video intervention to improve attitudes throughout medications for opioid use disorder in a correctional setting.简短的视频干预措施可改善监管场所阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗期间的态度。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Sep;104:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
7
Educational and Behavioral Counseling in a Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program in China: A Randomized Controlled Trial.中国美沙酮维持治疗项目中的教育与行为咨询:一项随机对照试验
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 4;9:113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00113. eCollection 2018.
8
Strategies to control HIV and HCV in methadone maintenance treatment in Guangdong Province, China: a system dynamic modeling study.中国广东省美沙酮维持治疗中控制 HIV 和 HCV 的策略:系统动力学建模研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0140-3.
9
Positive percentages of urine morphine tests among methadone maintenance treatment clients with HIV/AIDS: a 12-month follow-up study in Guangdong Province, China.美沙酮维持治疗的艾滋病病毒/艾滋病患者尿吗啡检测阳性率:中国广东省一项为期12个月的随访研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 27;7(4):e014237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014237.
10
Club drugs and alcohol abuse predicted dropout and poor adherence among methadone maintenance treatment patients in Guangzhou, China.在中国广州,新型毒品和酒精滥用是美沙酮维持治疗患者辍学及依从性差的预测因素。
AIDS Care. 2017 Apr;29(4):458-463. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1259452. Epub 2016 Nov 30.