• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国的家庭护理:在资金不足的情况下的市场。

Home care in England: markets in the context of under-funding.

机构信息

Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):292-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01059.x. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01059.x
PMID:22360615
Abstract

This paper traces developments in English home care services over two decades from the early 1990s. This longer-term perspective is used to show how factors shaping the broader restructuring of the English welfare state have impacted on home care services in particular. The two most salient features of these policies have been public sector funding constraints and extensive marketisation. Despite demographic trends, home care services have been deeply affected by the structural underfunding of long-term care services in general. The sector has been further shaped by the creation first of a 'mixed economy' of supply, with local authorities purchasing services from external providers instead of their own in-house services; and by the more recent introduction of a 'mixed economy' of purchasing, as greater emphasis is placed on individual choice and personalisation. The outcomes of these dual pressures are an increasingly residual publicly funded home care service and a growing role for private funding and supply. These outcomes have potentially damaging consequences for the quality of both public and private home care.

摘要

本文追溯了 20 多年来英国家庭护理服务的发展情况,时间跨度从 20 世纪 90 年代初开始。这一长期视角用于展示塑造英国福利制度更广泛重构的因素是如何特别影响家庭护理服务的。这些政策的两个最显著特点是公共部门资金限制和广泛的市场化。尽管存在人口趋势,但家庭护理服务还是受到了长期护理服务整体结构性资金不足的严重影响。该行业还受到以下因素的进一步塑造:首先是供应的“混合经济”的建立,地方当局从外部供应商那里购买服务,而不是从自己的内部服务中购买;其次是最近引入了“混合经济”的采购模式,因为更加注重个人选择和个性化。这双重压力的结果是公共资助的家庭护理服务日益减少,而私人资金和供应的作用越来越大。这些结果可能对公共和私人家庭护理的质量都产生潜在的破坏性影响。

相似文献

1
Home care in England: markets in the context of under-funding.英国的家庭护理:在资金不足的情况下的市场。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):292-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01059.x. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
2
Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition.瑞典老年人的家庭护理:转型中的普遍模式。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):300-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01046.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
3
Offloading social care responsibilities: recent experiences of local voluntary organisations in a remote urban centre in British Columbia, Canada.减轻社会护理责任:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省一个偏远城市中心当地志愿组织的近期经历。
Health Soc Care Community. 2007 Jul;15(4):343-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00693.x.
4
United Kingdom (England): Health system review.英国(英格兰):卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(1):1-483, xix-xx.
5
Transformation by stealth: the retargeting of home care services in Finland.悄然转型:芬兰家庭护理服务的重新定位。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):319-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01047.x. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
6
Long-term care: funding and insurance. End-of-year issue brief.长期护理:资金与保险。年终问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2009 Jan 5:1-24.
7
Long-term care: funding and insurance. End-of-year issue brief.长期护理:资金与保险。年终问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2008 Jan 7:1-22.
8
Home is not where the heart is: looming problems of the home care industry.家并非心之所在:家庭护理行业迫在眉睫的问题。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1994 Fall;17(2):227-42.
9
Privatization of social services: quality differences in Swedish elderly care.社会服务的私有化:瑞典老年护理中的质量差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Feb;72(4):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
10
Home care in Italy: a system on the move, in the opposite direction to what we expect.意大利的家庭护理:一个朝着与我们预期相反方向发展的系统。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 May;20(3):255-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01052.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Shifting from Fragmentation to Integration: A Systematic Analysis of Long-Term Care Insurance Policies in China.从碎片化到整合:中国长期护理保险政策的系统分析
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Sep 17;21(3):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5676. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
2
'I'm not just a number on a sheet, I'm a person': Domiciliary care, self and getting older.“我不仅仅是表格上的一个数字,我还是一个人”:家庭护理、自我和衰老。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):903-912. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12921. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
3
What does Brexit mean for the UK social care workforce? Perspectives from the recruitment and retention frontline.
英国脱欧对英国社会护理人员意味着什么?来自招聘和留用前线的观点。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):676-682. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12684. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
Bringing the Family in through the Back Door: the Stealthy Expansion of Family Care in Asian and European Long-Term Care Policy.让家庭从后门进入:亚洲和欧洲长期护理政策中家庭护理的悄然扩张
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2017 Sep;32(3):291-301. doi: 10.1007/s10823-017-9325-5.
5
Addressing the Social Determinants of Subjective Wellbeing: The Latest Challenge for Social Policy.应对主观幸福感的社会决定因素:社会政策的最新挑战。
J Soc Policy. 2013 Jul;42(3):541-565. doi: 10.1017/S0047279413000202.