• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

策略性分配注意力可减少时间上可预测的刺激冲突。

Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict.

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, B203 LSRC, Box 90999, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Sep;24(9):1834-48. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00209. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00209
PMID:22360623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3632454/
Abstract

Humans are able to continuously monitor environmental situations and adjust their behavioral strategies to optimize performance. Here we investigate the behavioral and brain adjustments that occur when conflicting stimulus elements are, or are not, temporally predictable. ERPs were collected while manual response variants of the Stroop task were performed in which the SOAs between the relevant color and irrelevant word stimulus components were either randomly intermixed or held constant within each experimental run. Results indicated that the size of both the neural and behavioral effects of stimulus incongruency varied with the temporal arrangement of the stimulus components, such that the random-SOA arrangements produced the greatest incongruency effects at the earliest irrelevant first SOA (-200 msec) and the constant-SOA arrangements produced the greatest effects with simultaneous presentation. These differences in conflict processing were accompanied by rapid (∼150 msec) modulations of the sensory ERPs to the irrelevant distractor components when they occurred consistently first. These effects suggest that individuals are able to strategically allocate attention in time to mitigate the influence of a temporally predictable distractor. As these adjustments are instantiated by the participants without instruction, they reveal a form of rapid strategic learning for dealing with temporally predictable stimulus incongruency.

摘要

人类能够持续监测环境情况,并调整行为策略以优化表现。在这里,我们研究了当冲突刺激元素在时间上可预测或不可预测时发生的行为和大脑调整。在执行 Stroop 任务的手动反应变体时收集了 ERP,其中相关颜色和不相关单词刺激成分之间的 SOA 要么随机混合,要么在每个实验运行中保持恒定。结果表明,刺激不一致的神经和行为效应的大小随刺激成分的时间排列而变化,使得随机 SOA 排列在最早的无关第一个 SOA(-200 毫秒)产生最大的不一致效应,而恒定 SOA 排列在同时呈现时产生最大的效应。这些冲突处理上的差异伴随着当它们一致地首先出现时对不相关干扰成分的快速(约 150 毫秒)感觉 ERP 调制。这些效应表明,个体能够有策略地在时间上分配注意力,以减轻时间上可预测的干扰的影响。由于这些调整是由参与者在没有指令的情况下实现的,因此它们揭示了一种快速的策略性学习形式,用于处理时间上可预测的刺激不一致性。

相似文献

1
Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict.策略性分配注意力可减少时间上可预测的刺激冲突。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Sep;24(9):1834-48. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00209. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
2
Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect.人类大脑中的启动和回溯影响:斯特鲁普干扰效应中的加工相互作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2508-21. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp036. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
3
The rapid distraction of attentional resources toward the source of incongruent stimulus input during multisensory conflict.在多感觉冲突期间,注意力资源迅速分散到不一致刺激输入的来源。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Apr;25(4):623-35. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00336. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
4
Cross-modal stimulus conflict: the behavioral effects of stimulus input timing in a visual-auditory Stroop task.跨模态刺激冲突:视觉-听觉斯特鲁普任务中刺激输入时间对行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 29;8(4):e62802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062802. Print 2013.
5
Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict.奖励预期的运用可增强准备性注意力并减少刺激冲突。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun;14(2):561-77. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0281-z.
6
Trait anxiety and the dynamics of attentional control.特质焦虑与注意控制的动态变化。
Biol Psychol. 2012 Jan;89(1):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.016. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
7
Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.冲突控制中选择性注意的临时和情境依赖调整:一项使用视觉探针的ERP研究
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 15;107:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.052. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
8
Rapid modulation of sensory processing induced by stimulus conflict.刺激冲突诱导的感觉处理快速调制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2620-8. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21575. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
9
Electrophysiological measures of conflict detection and resolution in the Stroop task.Stroop 任务中冲突检测和解决的电生理学测量。
Brain Res. 2011 Sep 21;1413:51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
10
Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.时间可预测性对纹状皮层前馈处理的外源性注意调制的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Jul;105:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Startle Response and Prepulse Inhibition in Psychosis and Violence: A Combined Electromyography and Electroencephalography Study.精神病与暴力中的惊吓反应和前脉冲抑制:一项肌电图和脑电图联合研究
Schizophr Bull Open. 2024 Dec 28;6(1):sgae031. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae031. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Conflicting Sensory Information Sharpens the Neural Representations of Early Selective Visuospatial Attention.冲突的感觉信息能使早期选择性视空间注意力的神经表征更加清晰。
J Neurosci. 2024 Aug 14;44(33):e2012232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2012-23.2024.
3
Neurobehavioral measures of coincidence anticipation timing.

本文引用的文献

1
PET Studies of Auditory and Phonological Processing: Effects of Stimulus Characteristics and Task Demands.PET 研究听觉和语音处理:刺激特征和任务需求的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Summer;7(3):357-75. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.357.
2
To group or not to group: an ecological consideration of the stroop effect.分组还是不分组:对斯特鲁普效应的生态学考量
Exp Psychol. 2010;57(4):275-91. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000033.
3
The temporal dynamics of implicit processing of non-letter, letter, and word-forms in the human visual cortex.
神经行为测量巧合预期时间。
J Vis. 2023 Aug 1;23(8):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.8.16.
4
Neural Dynamics of Conflict Control in Working Memory.工作记忆中冲突控制的神经动力学。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Sep 1;33(10):2079-2092. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01744.
5
The Relationship Between Attentional Capture by Speech and Nonfluent Speech Under Delayed Auditory Feedback: A Pilot Examination of a Dual-Task Using Auditory or Tactile Stimulation.延迟听觉反馈下言语引起的注意捕获与不流畅言语之间的关系:一项使用听觉或触觉刺激的双任务初步研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Feb 26;14:51. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00051. eCollection 2020.
6
When Conflict Cannot be Avoided: Relative Contributions of Early Selection and Frontal Executive Control in Mitigating Stroop Conflict.当冲突无法避免时:早期选择和额叶执行控制在减轻 Stroop 冲突中的相对贡献。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Dec 17;29(12):5037-5048. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz042.
7
Novel behavioral indicator of explicit awareness reveals temporal course of frontoparietal neural network facilitation during motor learning.明确意识的新型行为指标揭示了运动学习过程中额顶神经网络促进的时间进程。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 14;12(4):e0175176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175176. eCollection 2017.
8
The role of temporal predictability for early attentional adjustments after conflict.冲突后早期注意力调整中时间可预测性的作用。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 14;12(4):e0175694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175694. eCollection 2017.
9
The neural dynamics of stimulus and response conflict processing as a function of response complexity and task demands.作为反应复杂性和任务需求函数的刺激与反应冲突处理的神经动力学。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:14-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
10
(No) time for control: Frontal theta dynamics reveal the cost of temporally guided conflict anticipation.无暇控制:额叶θ波动力学揭示了时间引导的冲突预期成本。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Dec;15(4):787-807. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0367-2.
人类视觉皮层中对非字母、字母和单词形式的隐式处理的时间动态。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Nov 30;3:56. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.056.2009. eCollection 2009.
4
Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance.注意力、时间可预测性以及命名表现中情境效应的时间进程。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Feb;133(2):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
5
Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring.行为和神经证据表明存在项目特异性的表现监测。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2758-67. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21365.
6
A negative association between video game experience and proactive cognitive control.视频游戏体验与主动认知控制之间呈负相关。
Psychophysiology. 2010 Jan 1;47(1):34-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00925.x. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
7
Individualized EEG source reconstruction of Stroop interference with masked color words.采用掩蔽色词的 Stroop 干扰的个体化 EEG 源重建。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1800-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.032. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
8
Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect.人类大脑中的启动和回溯影响:斯特鲁普干扰效应中的加工相互作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2508-21. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp036. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
9
An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: the role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution.一项关于斯特鲁普任务的事件相关电位研究:扣带回在注意力分配和冲突解决中的作用。
Brain Res. 2009 Feb 9;1253:139-48. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.069. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
10
Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.冲突适应效应在Stroop任务上的神经时间进程。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):663-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.013. Epub 2008 Nov 21.