Laszlo Roman, Graze Hanna, Haas Christian, Kettering Klaus, Aebert Hermann, Ziemer Gerhard, Gawaz Meinrad, Schreieck Jürgen
Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.
Heart Surg Forum. 2012 Feb;15(1):E28-33. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20111105.
Box isolation of the posterior left atrium is one surgical or catheter ablative approach for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). In such cases, incomplete transmurality or recovery of pulmonary vein conduction after the application of various ablative techniques is considered the main reason for the recurrence of postprocedural arrhythmia. The use of solely cut-and-sew box isolation does not have these disadvantages and therefore demonstrates maximum efficacy for this therapeutic approach.
We treated 15 patients with both an indication for open heart surgery and AF (2 paroxysmal, 6 short persistent [<12 months], and 7 long persistent [>12 months] cases) with a solely cut-and-sew box lesion. These patients were then retrospectively followed up over the long term with respect to the end point of freedom of atrial tachyarrhythmias >30 seconds.
The median follow-up duration was 42 months (range, 32-84 months). Five (63%) of 8 patients with preoperative paroxysmal or short persistent AF had no arrhythmia recurrence, whereas arrhythmia recurrence was documented in all 7 patients with preoperative long persistent AF.
Despite reliable transmural isolation with cut-and-sew lesions, we observed long-term arrhythmia recurrence in patients who had preoperative paroxysmal or short persistent AF, suggesting that therapy approaches that are more complex than box isolation might be needed for selected patients to achieve long-term stable sinus rhythm, despite the initially paroxysmal or short persistent character of the arrhythmia. A high rate of recurrence in patients with severe structural heart disease and preoperative long persistent AF might indicate that, in general, isolation of the left posterior atrium alone is not an adequate therapeutic approach for these patients.
左心房后壁盒状隔离术是治疗心房颤动(AF)的一种外科手术或导管消融方法。在这类病例中,应用各种消融技术后肺静脉传导不完全透壁或恢复被认为是术后心律失常复发的主要原因。单纯采用切割缝合盒状隔离术不存在这些缺点,因此在这种治疗方法中显示出最大疗效。
我们对15例有心脏直视手术指征且合并AF的患者(2例阵发性、6例短程持续性[<12个月]和7例长程持续性[>12个月])采用单纯切割缝合盒状损伤进行治疗。然后对这些患者进行长期回顾性随访,以无持续>30秒的房性快速心律失常为终点。
中位随访时间为42个月(范围32 - 84个月)。8例术前阵发性或短程持续性AF患者中有5例(63%)无心律失常复发,而7例术前长程持续性AF患者均有记录到心律失常复发。
尽管采用切割缝合损伤可实现可靠的透壁隔离,但我们观察到术前阵发性或短程持续性AF患者存在长期心律失常复发,这表明对于部分患者,可能需要比盒状隔离更复杂的治疗方法才能实现长期稳定的窦性心律,尽管心律失常最初表现为阵发性或短程持续性。严重结构性心脏病且术前长程持续性AF患者的高复发率可能表明,总体而言,仅隔离左心房后壁对这些患者并非充分的治疗方法。