International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, and Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;93(5):905-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.024. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
To assess how frequently subjects with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) classified as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A have substantial preserved motor function below the neurologic level of injury, despite having no preserved sensory or motor function at the S4-5 spinal cord segment.
Analysis of the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury database to determine how frequently subjects assessed as AIS A would have been AIS D based on motor scores alone (ie, had scores of ≥3 in at least half of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury [ISNCSCI] key muscles below the neurologic level of injury, despite having no sacral sparing).
Eighteen European centers.
Individuals with traumatic SCI at any level (total of 2557 assessments).
Not applicable.
ISNCSCI assessments.
Over the first year after SCI (with assessments at approximately 1, 4, 12, 24, and 48wk) and for all rostrocaudal levels of injury, only 3.2% of AIS A assessments were found to meet the AIS D motor score criteria. The percentage was highest for lumbar (16.3%) and lower thoracic (4.4%) SCI. No trends were observed across time points.
These results suggest that the low frequency of individuals with an AIS A classification and high levels of motor function are not a significant concern in subject recruitment for clinical trials, unless the level of SCI is within the lumbar cord.
评估美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(AIS)分级为 A 的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者,尽管在 S4-5 脊髓节段无保留感觉或运动功能,但在损伤神经水平以下仍存在大量保留运动功能的频率。
对欧洲多中心脊髓损伤数据库进行分析,以确定根据运动评分单独评估为 AIS A 的患者中有多少会被评估为 AIS D(即,在损伤神经水平以下的至少一半国际标准神经分类脊髓损伤 [ISNCSCI] 关键肌肉中得分≥3,尽管无骶骨保留)。
十八个欧洲中心。
任何水平的创伤性 SCI 个体(共 2557 次评估)。
不适用。
ISNCSCI 评估。
在 SCI 后第一年(约在 1、4、12、24 和 48 周进行评估),以及所有前后方向的损伤水平,只有 3.2%的 AIS A 评估符合 AIS D 运动评分标准。在腰椎(16.3%)和下胸段(4.4%)SCI 中,这一比例最高。未观察到时间点之间的趋势。
这些结果表明,AIS A 分类和高水平运动功能的个体频率较低,在临床试验受试者招募中不是一个重要问题,除非 SCI 的水平在腰椎脊髓内。