Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):467-72. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.12. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
Existing attempts to explain why secondary researchers might have any obligation to return findings to the contributors of genetic samples falter because of the lack of any direct interaction between the secondary researchers and the contributors. The partial-entrustment account of these obligations defended here circumvents this problem by explaining how a chain of special responsibilities can be forged even in the absence of any direct interaction.Genet Med 2012:14(4):467-472.
现有的解释为什么次要研究人员可能有义务向遗传样本的贡献者返还研究结果的尝试失败了，因为次要研究人员和贡献者之间缺乏任何直接的互动。这里辩护的这些义务的部分委托解释了如何在没有任何直接互动的情况下形成特殊责任链，从而规避了这个问题。《基因医学》2012 年；14（4）：467-472。
