• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性助理教授写作小组。

A writing group for female assistant professors.

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Department of Surgery, 4 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;103(9-10):811-5. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30434-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30434-x
PMID:22364047
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The number of female medical school faculty being promoted and the speed at which they are promoted have not kept pace with their male counterparts at many institutions. One of the reasons is that these women are not publishing peer reviewed manuscripts at an equivalent rate. This study evaluates the impact of a women's writing group on faculty publication rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The writing group was conducted by 2 senior faculty members at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and targeted female junior faculty. The writing group consisted of a didactic skills curriculum, question sessions, and both faculty and peer support to improve publishing rates. Curriculum vitae were collected, and PubMed and Ovid searches were used to establish the publishing productivity of the writing group participants both before and after participation in the writing group.

RESULTS

On average, women who completed the writing group showed a nearly 3-fold increase in average publishing rate from 1.5 papers per year preceding the course to 4.5 per year following completion of the writing group (p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from our program suggest that a women's writing group is an effective intervention for increasing publishing rates of female junior faculty. In addition to the documented improvement in publication rates, we watched participants develop clearer writing styles, lose many of their inhibitions about writing, respond to group affiliation and collaboration, and gain tremendous self-confidence.

摘要

简介

在许多机构,女性医学院校教职员工的晋升数量及其晋升速度都不及男性同行。其中一个原因是,这些女性的同行评审论文发表率并不相当。本研究评估了女性写作小组对教职员工出版率的影响。

材料与方法

该写作小组由宾夕法尼亚大学医学院的 2 位资深教员领导,面向初级女性教员。写作小组由一个教学技能课程、问题会议以及教员和同行支持组成,旨在提高出版率。收集了简历,并使用 PubMed 和 Ovid 搜索来确定写作小组成员在参加写作小组前后的出版生产力。

结果

平均而言,完成写作小组的女性的平均出版率从课程前每年 1.5 篇增加到每年 4.5 篇(p<.001)。

结论

我们项目的结果表明,女性写作小组是提高女性初级教职员工出版率的有效干预措施。除了记录出版率的提高外,我们还观察到参与者发展出更清晰的写作风格,消除了许多写作障碍,对团体隶属关系和合作做出回应,并获得了巨大的自信。

相似文献

1
A writing group for female assistant professors.女性助理教授写作小组。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;103(9-10):811-5. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30434-x.
2
Peer support of a faculty "writers' circle" increases confidence and productivity in generating scholarship.教师“写作圈”的同伴支持可增强开展学术研究的信心并提高其效率。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
3
Writing Support Group for Medical School Faculty-A Simple Way to Do It.医学教师写作支持小组——一种简单的方法
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Oct-Dec;35(5):601-608. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2092114. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
4
Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group.撰写医学教育领域的出版文章:教师发展研讨会和同行写作小组的益处
Med Teach. 2008;30(8):e280-5. doi: 10.1080/01421590802337120.
5
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve the Success of Women Assistant Professors.一项提高女性助理教授成功率的随机对照试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 May;26(5):571-579. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6025. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
6
Science & gender: vision and mission.科学与性别:愿景与使命。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010 Mar;122(5-6):123-5. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1320-6.
7
Gender aspects in medical publication - the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.医学文献中的性别问题——《维也纳临床周报》。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2010 Mar;122(5-6):141-5. doi: 10.1007/s00508-010-1302-8.
8
Gender disparities in scholarly productivity of US academic surgeons.美国学术外科医生学术产出中的性别差异。
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 1;203(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.060. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
9
The gender gap in academic medicine: comparing results from a multifaceted intervention for stanford faculty to peer and national cohorts.医学学术领域的性别差距:斯坦福大学教师多方面干预措施的结果与同行和全国队列的比较。
Acad Med. 2014 Jun;89(6):904-11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000245.
10
Determinants of journal choice among Nigerian medics.尼日利亚医务人员选择期刊的决定因素。
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Jun 24;21:148. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.148.6534. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials.一项旨在减少随机试验中发表偏倚的活动的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;13(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02728-5.
2
"Getting Started": A Pilot Introductory Narrative Writing Session for Interprofessional Faculty in Academic Health Sciences.“入门指南”:面向学术健康科学领域跨专业教师的试点入门叙事写作课程
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Mar 15;13:265-274. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S350246. eCollection 2022.
3
A Scoping Review of Peer Support Writing Groups in Academic Medicine as a Valuable Tool for Physician-Scientists in the Publish or Perish Era.
学术医学领域同行支持写作小组作为“要么发表,要么灭亡”时代医生科学家的宝贵工具的范围综述。
Med Sci Educ. 2020 May 19;30(3):1313-1319. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00983-4. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Content and outcomes of narrative medicine programmes: a systematic review of the literature through 2019.叙事医学项目的内容和结果:通过 2019 年文献的系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 26;10(1):e031568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031568.
5
Design and Evaluation of a Longitudinal Faculty Development Program to Advance Scholarly Writing Among Pharmacy Practice Faculty.设计和评估一项纵向教师发展计划,以提高药学实践教师的学术写作水平。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6556. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6556.
6
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve the Success of Women Assistant Professors.一项提高女性助理教授成功率的随机对照试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 May;26(5):571-579. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6025. Epub 2017 Feb 28.