• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学教师写作支持小组——一种简单的方法

Writing Support Group for Medical School Faculty-A Simple Way to Do It.

机构信息

Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2023 Oct-Dec;35(5):601-608. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2092114. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1080/10401334.2022.2092114
PMID:35775615
Abstract

: Writing for publication is a core activity for many medical school faculty, but faculty report numerous challenges to publication. To help address these challenges, some medical schools establish writing support programs, but those programs are often resource-intensive, involving didactic courses, accountability groups, formal mentorships, and even assistance from professional writers. Not all medical schools, however, provide resources for such programs, and many faculty members, especially clinicians, lack time needed to participate. Furthermore, success of these programs is typically judged by the total number of papers published. However, many clinicians would judge success as publication of the occasional papers they decide to write, not the total number of papers they or the group publish. With these issues in mind, we established a low-resource writing program focused on individual acceptance rates rather than total publications. : Our writing program is an informal group that meets monthly. Members bring their ideas for papers and drafts of papers, and other members provide critique and suggestions for improvement. Members then revise their papers to address that critique prior to journal submission. There are no formal or assigned mentors, courses, lectures, or writing assistants. : The program takes place in our family medicine department, in which faculty have various roles. Some group members are clinician-educators seeking to publish occasional clinical reviews or research articles; others are PhDs seeking to publish on aspects of their work. : During the six years of the program, 86% of papers reviewed by the group were accepted for publication and 94% of those were accepted by the journal to which they were first submitted. Publication success rate of individual members averaged 79%. This exceeds the 30-40% acceptance rate for scholarly journals worldwide. Group members published an average of 5.2 papers per member, with some publishing as few as 2-3 papers and others as many as 10-11. : An informal, low-resource writing program in medical school departments can help faculty reach their publication goals. We found that members were satisfied by having the group help them publish whatever number of papers they decided to write. The program's simple, informal approach fostered a culture of respectful and collegial interactions, in which members learned to depend on and accept critiques from colleagues. Finally, an unexpected benefit of our program resulted from membership of both clinicians and non-clinicians. This provided feedback from individuals with different perspectives, which enhanced development of manuscripts.

摘要

: 对于许多医学院校的教师来说,发表文章是其核心活动之一,但他们在发表文章方面也面临诸多挑战。为了帮助解决这些挑战,一些医学院校设立了写作支持项目,但这些项目通常需要大量资源,包括授课课程、问责制小组、正式指导和甚至专业作家的帮助。然而,并非所有医学院校都为这些项目提供资源,许多教师,尤其是临床医生,缺乏参与所需的时间。此外,这些项目的成功通常以发表的论文总数来判断。然而,许多临床医生会将成功定义为偶尔发表他们决定撰写的论文,而不是他们或小组发表的论文总数。考虑到这些问题,我们设立了一个资源需求较低的写作项目,重点关注个人的接受率,而不是总发表量。 : 我们的写作项目是一个每月举行一次的非正式小组。成员们带来他们的论文想法和草稿,其他成员则提供批评和改进建议。成员们在提交期刊之前,根据批评意见对论文进行修改。该项目没有正式或指定的导师、课程、讲座或写作助理。 : 该项目在我们的家庭医学系进行,该系的教职员工有不同的角色。一些小组成员是临床教育工作者,他们希望偶尔发表临床评论或研究文章;另一些则是博士生,他们希望发表与工作相关的论文。 : 在项目的六年中,小组审查的论文中有 86%被接受发表,其中 94%被最初提交的期刊接受。个人成员的出版成功率平均为 79%。这超过了全球学术期刊 30-40%的接受率。小组成员平均每人发表 5.2 篇论文,有些人发表了 2-3 篇论文,而有些人则发表了 10-11 篇论文。 : 医学院系的一个非正式、资源需求较低的写作项目可以帮助教师实现他们的出版目标。我们发现,小组成员通过帮助他们发表他们决定撰写的论文数量而感到满意。该项目简单、非正式的方法培养了一种尊重和友好的互动文化,成员们学会了依赖和接受同事的批评。最后,我们项目的一个意外好处来自临床医生和非临床医生的成员。这从不同角度提供了反馈,从而增强了手稿的发展。

相似文献

1
Writing Support Group for Medical School Faculty-A Simple Way to Do It.医学教师写作支持小组——一种简单的方法
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Oct-Dec;35(5):601-608. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2092114. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
2
Peer support of a faculty "writers' circle" increases confidence and productivity in generating scholarship.教师“写作圈”的同伴支持可增强开展学术研究的信心并提高其效率。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
3
Journal publications from Zagreb University Medical School in 1995-1999.萨格勒布大学医学院1995年至1999年的期刊出版物。
Croat Med J. 2003 Dec;44(6):681-9.
4
A physician peer support writing group.一个医生同伴支持写作小组。
Fam Med. 2003 Mar;35(3):195-201.
5
Writing Together to Get AHEAD: an interprofessional boot camp to support scholarly writing in the health professions.携手写作以取得进步:一个支持卫生专业学术写作的跨专业培训营。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Apr;105(2):167-172. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.222.
6
From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica.克罗地亚皮肤性病学会史——克罗地亚医学协会及《克罗地亚皮肤性病学学报》重要信息概述
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Dec;26(4):344-348.
7
Design and Evaluation of a Longitudinal Faculty Development Program to Advance Scholarly Writing Among Pharmacy Practice Faculty.设计和评估一项纵向教师发展计划,以提高药学实践教师的学术写作水平。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6556. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6556.
8
A writing group for female assistant professors.女性助理教授写作小组。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;103(9-10):811-5. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30434-x.
9
Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group.撰写医学教育领域的出版文章:教师发展研讨会和同行写作小组的益处
Med Teach. 2008;30(8):e280-5. doi: 10.1080/01421590802337120.
10
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials.一项旨在减少随机试验中发表偏倚的活动的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;13(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02728-5.