Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Aug;14(8):717-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01591.x. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
To analyse clinical characteristics and treatment results in unselected type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, with non-pharmacological treatment as well as the most commonly used pharmacological glucose-lowering treatment regimens, in everyday clinical practice.
In this population-based cross-sectional study, information was linked from the Swedish National Diabetes Register, Prescribed Drug Register and Patient Register. T2DM patients with non-pharmacological treatment and T2DM patients continuously using the 12 most common pharmacological treatment regimens were included in the study (n = 163121).
There were statistically significant differences in clinical characteristics between the groups. Patients with insulin-based treatment regimens had the longest duration of diabetes and more cardiovascular risk factors than the T2DM-population in general. The proportion of patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% varied between 70.1% (metformin) and 25.0% [premixed insulin (PMI) + SU) in patients with pharmacological treatment. 84.8% of the patients with non-pharmacological treatment reached target. Compared to patients on metformin, patients on other pharmacological treatments had a lower likelihood, with hazard ratios ranging from 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-0.63 to 0.97;0.94-0.99, of having HbA1c ≤ 7% (adjusted for covariates). Patients on insulin-based treatments had the lowest likelihood, while non-pharmacological treatment was associated with an increased likelihood of having HbA1c ≤ 7%.
This nation-wide study shows insufficiently reached treatment goals for haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in all treatment groups. Patients on insulin-based treatment regimens had the longest duration of diabetes, more cardiovascular risk factors and the highest proportions of patients not reaching HbA1c target.
分析在非药物治疗以及最常用的药物降糖治疗方案的情况下,未经选择的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的临床特征和治疗结果,这些治疗均在日常临床实践中进行。
在这项基于人群的横断面研究中,从瑞典国家糖尿病登记处、处方药物登记处和患者登记处获取信息。将接受非药物治疗的 T2DM 患者和连续使用 12 种最常见药物治疗方案的 T2DM 患者纳入研究(n=163121)。
各组患者的临床特征存在统计学差异。与一般 T2DM 患者相比,接受胰岛素治疗方案的患者糖尿病病程最长,且心血管危险因素更多。接受药物治疗的患者中,HbA1c≤7%的患者比例在 70.1%(二甲双胍)至 25.0%[预混胰岛素(PMI)+SU]之间变化。84.8%接受非药物治疗的患者达到了目标。与接受二甲双胍治疗的患者相比,接受其他药物治疗的患者HbA1c≤7%的可能性较低,风险比范围为 0.58(95%置信区间,0.54-0.63)至 0.97(0.94-0.99)。接受胰岛素治疗的患者可能性最低,而接受非药物治疗与 HbA1c≤7%的可能性增加相关。
这项全国性研究表明,所有治疗组的血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)治疗目标均未得到充分实现。接受胰岛素治疗方案的患者糖尿病病程最长,心血管危险因素更多,且未达到 HbA1c 目标的患者比例最高。